An execution, in the United States, can be authorized for a convicted criminal in five forms, including lethal injection, which is used in 33 states for an execution. A few states authorize an execution by electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, or firing squad. Shemtob and Lat offer a strong case about public executions, including, when a convict is executed the people have a constitutional right and responsibility to ensure that the convict on death row is administered a procedure that is humane.
Shemtob’s and Lat’s essay adamantly argues for public executions for all the people to observe, not just news media and selected observers. Shemtob and Lat support this view because the people have a responsibility to know how all executions unfold. The current method, they argue, goes against their constitutional rights because they have a democratic responsibility to ensure executions proceed humanely. Ultimately, they claim, they do not know what is …show more content…
This will also ensure the use of tax dollars of voters is for an execution that is humane. Equally important is the convict on death row who, in fact, the country has tried and charged as unfit to live another day. Truly, we need to ensure that we establish liability by videotaping executions. Also, a public execution must proceed in a humane manner; whatever, the form of an execution or how familiar it becomes to voters.
In particular, the authorization of an execution varies from state to state. For example, the state of Utah in March 2015 reauthorized a firing squad in the event that the drugs for lethal injection are unavailable. Consequently, views from the government change as to what is an acceptable form of execution, but the empathy we can show for the convict, during an execution, on their last day does not need to