Shelly Kagan's Article: Is Death Bad For You?

Improved Essays
One of the most taboo topics in American culture is death. People hate discussing it, thinking about it, and are not good at handling it. This is not a shared concept throughout the world though, as places like Mexico for example celebrate death. With these two different ways of viewing death it is fair to ask why there is such a strong difference in viewing death? Obviously, a simple answer would be to just state that the cultures are different, however, when thinking of death in terms of being good or bad the different cultures add insight to the discussion. How one group of people can celebrate something that others fear and believe to be the worst thing in the world highlights the difference in opinions and how focusing on different aspects …show more content…
The Deprivation Account simply states that death is bad for us because it deprives us of the goods in life. To defend this Kagan relies on logic of it as well as solving the puzzles of existence while avoiding simpler objections to her Deprivation Account. The first objection is changing her account to state that, death is good for us because it deprives us of the bad things in life. What seems like a nonsense objection must be addressed because as depressing as it is to think about it does make some sense. Life is full of struggles and challenges and although most people experience more good times than bad, there are still many who are overwhelmed with negativity and problems. Kagan would most likely respond to this objection of her Deprivation Account like many others would by saying that no matter how bad things get death is never the solution because there is always a chance that life will get better. This response is very strong and expected, as the clear majority of people would never view life so negatively to the point that they thought death was the best option. However, there is still the minority that, do to all the things they are going through feel that death is the better option than living, which as sad as it may be is a view that cannot be ignored. As negative as the objection stated above is it brings another view point into Kagan’s Deprivation account

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The issue with this topic is that everyone including Foot and Thomson have their own opinions as to which one is worse. We are also presented with positive and negative duties which can help influence what we think when it comes to killing versus letting die. We can have the positive duty of not letting someone die and we can have the negative duty of not killing. Negative duties are more stringent than positive duties. I personally feel that killing is worse…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life is extremely complex and difficult, but no one wants to die a horrible and painful death. Yet, is suffering a horrendous life better. What about people that enjoy their lives, but have to give them up because of some foolish made-up story. This proves that making life choices is is a lot more than just hard or difficult, it is a matter of life and death sometimes. Arthur Miller has great character developement of John Proctor to show the tortuous choices he has to make and the consequences of lies in The Crucible.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is destroying the sanctity of the United States Justice system as we know it. The most common form of carrying out the death penalty is ineffective, the whole process of the death penalty is expensive and lengthy, and people simply don’t want it anymore. It is a barbaric way of treating criminals and is more of a burden than a benefit. There are other ways to treat terrible criminals that would keep them isolated and with no chance of escaping. The death penalty, as in any case, is determined by the judge and jury.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Everyone agrees that killing a fully developed person is normally wrong. And there is similar agreement that death is bad for the one who dies, though philosophers have been puzzled about how to explain this. But how is the wrongness of killing related to the badness of dying? The answer is that killing is wrong precisely because it inflicts the badness of death upon the victim. Or, to put it another way, killing is wrong because it harms the victim by causing all that is bad about death.” The topic of killing versus allowing a person to die is a major ethical debate when it comes to decisions made during the process of end of life of an individual.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many philosophers argued that, logically death should not be feared, however mankind still resent the ideas of death. American philosopher, Thomas Nagel, discusses the notion that death is bad because it deprives an individual the possibility of life. “Death” by Thomas Nagel, discusses what makes death bad for the individual and what problems arise from his theories. Nagel opposing intelligent philosophers such…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Sniper And War Is Kind

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This verbal irony might be compassion towards those whose loved ones have been slaughtered and it can be simple mockery of the dystopian endless massacre. It may also be a way of propaganda. Also, inanimate objects can’t truly be kind, in other words what Crane also did with the verbal irony is to give it some personification in order to achieve the wanted result. Not only does that sentence not inform the reader of the horrors of war, but it says the exact opposite of what war is actually about. However, in this case “war is kind” because war represents death, so the speaker suggests that war is simply the way out of that ghastly society for those who have already fallen.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These individuals feel as though the morality with these processions are bias and unfair, as “death sentences are imposed in a criminal justice system that treats you better if you are rich and guilty than if you are poor and innocent” (ProCon 2009). In contrast to those who think offenders get what they deserve, those who are against the act label it as revenge instead of retribution. Though this act is known to provide closure for the families offended, these individuals feel as though the death penalty is just “expressing one’s violence simply reinforces the desire to express it” (ProCon 2009). Lastly anti-death penalty individuals believe that the majority of those getting sentenced the death penalty are the poor, as they believe that they cannot afford to get a good defense team (ProCon…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Euthanasia

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attempts to figure out what constitutes a good death has often lead to more questions. However, not all deaths are sad; people always prefer some deaths to other deaths. No one likes to suffer; therefore everyone would always go for the type of death where they would die without going through much pain. Death in the sleep is preferred to death by fire or by any form of drowning. Death from old age with the support of loved ones is always not so painful in as much as these loved ones are left behind feeling sad.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He did not believe that suicide was prima facie ethical. Aristotle also thought that suicide was prima facie unethical. He stated that it is wrong because it causes harm and violates our duties to members of our community. Most of the great minds that I have learned about in ethics or history courses did not believe that suicide was an acceptable act. Most of the rationale based on these assertions is based on the effects death has on the cherished ones of the…

    • 2447 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This plays a huge role because it just shows how bad the United States is with dealing with all of their problems. To help people understand how it feels. It brings the families of the victim closure, allowing them to live is an injustice to the victim itself. (Put the death penalty out of its misery) It gives closure to the families by killing; By not killing the criminal, that would be an injustice to the victim. This mean they have to kill another person to help one family get over a death that has to happen and this will result in the families feeling an injustice so it 's hard either way you put it.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays