Shelley V. Kraemer

Improved Essays
Eventually these methods were made necessary by segregationist due to the ruling in 1948 of the Shelley v. Kraemer, which made the enforcement of covenants through municipal or state powers. Under the Shelley v. Kraemer ruling, these covenants were not made illegal, rather private parties would now have to enforce covenants amongst themselves if continued use was wanted (Taylor 197-198). After this ruling, restrictive covenants acted as more of a community agreement than anything legally substantial.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case was brought by Mrs. Lucinda Bixler after the death of her husband, Vaughn. Mr. Bixler was employed by a company called Drivers who supplied truck drivers to local firms and was also a member of Teamsters Local 776. This union established a fund to supply members with medical, disability, and life insurance which the Bixlers were paying into and receiving benefits from. This fund is designed to accept contributions from the members of the union in line with collective bargaining agreements establishing a number of different levels of coverage. Mr. Bixler just happened to become ill during a time when the bargaining was at a stalemate and coverage was in jeopardy of being cut to the members of the union fund.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hodgson Case Doctor Jane Hodgson performed an illegal abortion on a woman who was in danger of infection if her child was born since the child was infected. She turned herself into the police in order to change the law of abortion in Minnesota. She was convicted in the trial court. Hodgson appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court they also ruled that Hodgson was guilty and so Hodgson took the case to the US Supreme Court…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the court case Garrity Vs New Jersey the officer on trial was made to incriminate himself by being forced to testify. This officer was later convicted on his testimony. The supreme court hailed that the officers answers could not be used against him in his criminal trial because the fifth amendment forbid a coerced confession. Today the Garrity rule states if an officer is compelled to provide self incriminating statements information or statements such statements can not be used in a criminal proceeding, but officers can be disciplined or discharged.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the question of whether a group of students’ rights under the first amendment are violated is asked. These students had written articles for their school newspaper, which they had then submitted for review to their advisor, who passed the articles on to the principal, Robert Reynolds. Reynolds found two articles concerning, and with the approval of his superiors, eradicated the two pages that these articles were on from that publication of the newspaper. The principal’s deletion of these articles did violate the students’ rights under the 1st Amendment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Norma McCorvey, a pregnant women that resided in Dallas, Texas, was the first to challenge one of the 19th Century Statutes that was still around during the 1970 's. This case become one of the most widely known court cases, Roe vs. Wade. With the use of the alias, “Jane Roe,” McCorvey sued Henry Wade, which was the Dallas County district attorney, so she could have the option of abortion (Roe vs. Wade, 2011). Texas had a ban on abortions with the exception that the pregnancy did not threaten the life of the women. Although the pregnancy had no threat to McCorvey 's life, she was considered to be a poor single women and was choosing not to bring a child into a world where she knew she could not support it. There was always the option to travel elsewhere to have the abortion with no issue, but as noted before, she was not one to have money.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shelley vs. Kraemer is a case about a black man who bought a house in 1945 in a racially restricted neighborhood in St. Louis, Missouri. In the early 1900's, this type of restriction was apparently allowed. The neighborhood immediately tried…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, the Tinkers were suing because they believed that their school violated their first amendment right to freedom of speech. This case was decided in 1969 under the Warren Court with a 7-2 decision. Three of the Tinker children and one of their friends wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Just before the children did this, the school made a rule against protesting the Vietnam War. When the children went to school with the black armbands on, they were suspended.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kentucky Court Case

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Background: In Lexington, KY, police were conducting an undercover operation to catch someone selling crack cocaine. The seller was being sold out by an undercover informant. When the suspect fled the scene after catching a glimpse of the cops he ran around a corner and into an apartment building causing the cops to lose sight of him. The cops knocked on the door of one apartment and heard people moving around and entered the apartment because the smell of marijuana came through the door.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mccleskey Court Case

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issues started when McCleskey, an African American, was convicted of two charges of robbery and one charge of murder and was sentenced to the death penalty. These actions were taken on the account of McCleskey robbing a furniture store in Atlanta, Georgia and murdering a Caucasian police officer in the process, by shooting him with a gun. Later witnesses brought in the gun he used, and one of the bullets that were fired that night. The jury did find him guilty and charged him for the things he did. McCleskey tried to defend himself in court by stating that they were violating the eighth and fourteenth amendment, which both explain things about equal protection rights, and cruel and harsh punishments, given to those who are tired.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Court Case

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Over time, the Roe v. Wade court case affected almost every American in one way another. Before the case, there were many years of debates, protesting, and movements. Also, during these years, Norma McCorvey grew into an adult and lived through many difficulties. A third cause that led to the case was the passion that two lawyers from Texas had. An increase of abortions was the most crucial impact the case had.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Perry Case

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After participating in and reviewing the Q.B trial R v. Perry & Manitoba in regards to the role of the investigator, and the physical evidence that was implemented in the trial, four individual pieces of physical evidence were introduced to the court by the investigator (cite). These four pieces of evidence consist of, a black wallet that was found on Matlock Manitoba, a time X watch found on Mason Perry, and a knife and a replica firearm found in a dumpster, in the back ally where Mason Perry and Matlock Manitoba were arrested. In relation to the introduction of evidence, the wallet, and Time X watch that supposedly belonged to Monty Hall was first introduced into court by the Crown during the testimony of Monty Hall, stating that his black wallet and Time X watch was stolen from him during the robbery. Additionally, they were shown to Hall asking how both compared to the ones that were stolen, then entered them into court as exhibit one and two. The physical evidence was then brought up once again when Constable York started his testimony, adding that Manitoba was in possession of the wallet and Perry of the Time X watch when found hiding in a bush within the back ally.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays