After participating in and reviewing the Q.B trial R v. Perry & Manitoba in regards to the role of the investigator, and the physical evidence that was implemented in the trial, four individual pieces of physical evidence were introduced to the court by the investigator (cite). These four pieces of evidence consist of, a black wallet that was found on Matlock Manitoba, a time X watch found on Mason Perry, and a knife and a replica firearm found in a dumpster, in the back ally where Mason Perry and Matlock Manitoba were arrested. In relation to the introduction of evidence, the wallet, and Time X watch that supposedly belonged to Monty Hall was first introduced into court by the Crown during the testimony of Monty Hall, stating that his black wallet and Time X watch was stolen from him during the robbery. Additionally, they were shown to Hall asking how both compared to the ones that were stolen, then entered them into court as exhibit one and two. The physical evidence was then brought up once again when Constable York started his testimony, adding that Manitoba was in possession of the wallet and Perry of the Time X watch when found hiding in a bush within the back ally.…
requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…
In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…
Facts of the Case: During a group game of basketball between Jason Shelley and Mario Gonzalez, Jason Shelley deliberately punched Mr. Gonazalez in the jaw. The two had been very aggressive towards one another throughout the entire game. Gonzalez’s jaw was broken and his injury required emergency surgery. Gonzalez’s jaw also had to be wired shut causing him tremendous pain, greatly impacting the quality and productivity of life.…
Hodgson Case Doctor Jane Hodgson performed an illegal abortion on a woman who was in danger of infection if her child was born since the child was infected. She turned herself into the police in order to change the law of abortion in Minnesota. She was convicted in the trial court. Hodgson appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court they also ruled that Hodgson was guilty and so Hodgson took the case to the US Supreme Court…
Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…
Thesis Statement~ Madalyn Murray O'hair's 1963 Supreme Court case victory removing religion from the public school system has had a directly observable effect on the breakdown of necessary teachings of ethics, morals and values at a very impressionable development period, which is leading to increased acts of juvenile delinquency, teen pregnancy, teen suicide, violence and disrespect for authority. The void created from the removal of religious teachings in public schools has exploded into school age tragedy and dysfunction. Introduction ~ Madalyn Murray O'hair's is known as the woman who removed religious teachings from the public school system.…
Norma McCorvey, a pregnant women that resided in Dallas, Texas, was the first to challenge one of the 19th Century Statutes that was still around during the 1970 's. This case become one of the most widely known court cases, Roe vs. Wade. With the use of the alias, “Jane Roe,” McCorvey sued Henry Wade, which was the Dallas County district attorney, so she could have the option of abortion (Roe vs. Wade, 2011). Texas had a ban on abortions with the exception that the pregnancy did not threaten the life of the women. Although the pregnancy had no threat to McCorvey 's life, she was considered to be a poor single women and was choosing not to bring a child into a world where she knew she could not support it. There was always the option to travel elsewhere to have the abortion with no issue, but as noted before, she was not one to have money.…
Shelley vs. Kraemer is a case about a black man who bought a house in 1945 in a racially restricted neighborhood in St. Louis, Missouri. In the early 1900's, this type of restriction was apparently allowed. The neighborhood immediately tried…
In the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, the Tinkers were suing because they believed that their school violated their first amendment right to freedom of speech. This case was decided in 1969 under the Warren Court with a 7-2 decision. Three of the Tinker children and one of their friends wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Just before the children did this, the school made a rule against protesting the Vietnam War. When the children went to school with the black armbands on, they were suspended.…
Background: In Lexington, KY, police were conducting an undercover operation to catch someone selling crack cocaine. The seller was being sold out by an undercover informant. When the suspect fled the scene after catching a glimpse of the cops he ran around a corner and into an apartment building causing the cops to lose sight of him. The cops knocked on the door of one apartment and heard people moving around and entered the apartment because the smell of marijuana came through the door.…
III. Shelley v. Kraemer A. Shelley v. Kraemer When Mr. and Mrs. Shelley bought the property on Labadie Street in St. Louis, they had no knowledge of the existence of a racially restrictive covenant imposed on the parcel. The neighbors sued for an injunction to restrain the Shelleys from taking possession of the property and to legally dispossess them of their title. This action was one of many throughout the United States, as lower courts upheld covenants denying black persons the opportunity to partake in the American Dream. It took a concerted effort by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and many other individuals and organizations to begin changing the legal panorama.…
Over time, the Roe v. Wade court case affected almost every American in one way another. Before the case, there were many years of debates, protesting, and movements. Also, during these years, Norma McCorvey grew into an adult and lived through many difficulties. A third cause that led to the case was the passion that two lawyers from Texas had. An increase of abortions was the most crucial impact the case had.…
The first big battleground for the 50s of civil rights was over education. The Civil Rights Movement was not only bordered by the South’s issues, but also bordered by only racial inequality. Segregation was much larger than southern states. One of the infamous key cases in higher education is George McLaurin v. Oklahoma. McLaurin wanted to pursue getting his doctorate in education at University of Oklahoma, but due to its segregated policies, it did not offer any facilities for black students.…
Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…