May 05, 2009 Legal History: Howard D. Brunson the plaintiff filed a four count complaint in the Supreme Court of New Jersey against Affinity Federal Credit Union and Wilcox for being liable to him for malicious prosecution (Count 1); That Wilcox was liable to plaintiff to negligence (Count 2): That Affinity was liable to plaintiff in hiring of Wilcox (Count 3); and that the person who actually committed the crime was liable to the plaintiff in negligence. (Count 4). Affinity and Wilcox moved for entry of summary judgement in their favor and wanted the case dismissed because they plaintiff had failed to appear for a deposition or a response to a notice which was in lieu of subpoena. Even though the plaintiff objected the trial court granted both motions.…
On 2-3-2016 Amanda Zgrabik was arrest for Domestic violence and endangering children. It was determined while Christopher Lytle Amanda’s son was in her care he consumed her prescription medication. Amanda stated to Officer’s she believed Christopher ingested marijuana. Officer’s located Thomas at the Emergence room with Christopher. Staff at the Emergence room advise the Christopher’s blood work tested positive for Benzodiazaping, not THC.…
COMES NOW the Defendant, Ulriste Tulin, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and filed this supplement to the Defendant’s Motion and Reply for New Trial. This supplement includes the Affidavit from Dr. Athena Kolbe in regards to the Haitian court records, Mr. Tulin sought, and Mr. Tulin’s hairstyle when he was taken into custody in Haiti. The Commissaire du Gouvernement pres le Tribunal de Premiere Instance de Port-au-Prince advised Dr. Kolbe they would not release the records without the U.S. Embassy’s permission and to request them from the U. S. Embassy. However, Mr. Danton Léger, Commissaire du Gouvernement pres le Tribunal de Premiere Instance de Port-au-Prince (the Haitian equivalent of the District Attorney’s office) confirmed…
Bordenkecher (formerly Paula Bowie) (“Ms. Bordenkecher”) argues “I am not liable, because I said so.” Before even filing an answer to the complaint, Ms. Bordenkecher files a motion for summary judgment based only on her self-serving statement that she was not involved in the conduct alleged in the complaint and an affidavit from the individual that has otherwise ignored the jurisdiction of this court for over half a decade. In disposing of this motion for summary judgment, this Court must determine whether there is any genuine dispute that Ms. Bordenkecher was involved in the conduct alleged in the complaint. At this juncture, the aforementioned question must be answered in the positive, and therefore, Ms. Bordenkecher’s motion must be…
In 1997, the Texas legislature enacted a law requiring all public universities in Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school’s graduating class. The University of Texas at Austin, after finding disparities between the racial and ethnic makeup of the university's undergraduate population and the state's population, decided to modify its race-neutral admissions policy. The new policy continued to admit all in-state students who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes, however, for the remainder of the in-state freshman class the university would consider race as a factor for admissions into the university. The plaintiff, Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Texas in 2008.…
Imagine that you apply for a job. You have the requirements, even more than the necessary requirements, but you are turned away because you do not fit the looks that they have. Because of your religious wear, it causes a problem with “the look,” that the store is trying to achieve. This case ran through multiple courts and it eventually reached a decision. But since the procedure to come towards a conclusion took so long that there were multiple judgments throughout the full case.…
Katelyn Stetzel is a pleasure to work with and supervise. I have enjoyed this opportunity watch Katelyn grow from a new employee to great investigator with the agency in such a short period of time. Although Katelyn is new to the agency, she is very willing to learn. She seeks out opportunities in which to educate herself in child protective services. She lends herself and her knowledge to new employees and seasoned employee.…
Respectfully submitted, _________________________________________ John R. Bell, Jr. (SC Bar No. 72599) John Bell Law…
Historical Setting In a 1966 amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government began providing financial aid to states that provided education for children with disabilities. The program evolved into the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) of 1970. After a couple of lawsuits and an updated Act, the government determined that students with disabilities had the right to public education, and parents had the right to participate in the process (Wright, 2010). Amy Rowley, a first-grader with an auditory impairment, and her family filed suit against her school district in the Federal District Court after the New York Commissioner of Education affirmed the school district’s decision to refuse a sign-language interpreter.…
Background Section 24 of the British North America Act said that only “qualified” people could be appointed to Canadian Senate, interpreting this phrase meaning men only and should continue to refer to only men .This matter quickly became known as the “Persons Case”. Five Albertan Women lead by judge Emily Murphy, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise Crummy McKinney and Irene Parlby fought to have Canadian Women recognized constitutionally as “persons” who were eligible to be named Senate. However The Supreme Court of Canada rejected their case in 1928 but was favorited by the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council, which was one authority higher than the Supreme Court of Canada. These courageous women came to…
Courtroom Number and Name of Judge * Note: I attended the central branch court in downtown San Diego with my peer, Tina Nguyen, on Friday May 11, 2018. -The courtroom number was 1901 and the judge was Peter L. Gallagher. Names of Prosecutor and Defense Attorney -The prosecutor in this case was Amy Colby while the defense attorney was Ryan MacGuire Fong.…
WOW. This article was beyond sad. I have mixed feelings towards how everyone came out of this case, first of all lets talk about David Steward, I can’t believe he was found NOT guilty of all charges made out to him, he DID buy the phone cards after all, if it wasn’t him making the calls it was someone he knew. Then there is Donna Summers’, who I do believe was at fault for some of the humiliation that Louise Ogborn experienced, but honestly getting fired to me seemed excessive, she was also a victim of Steward, even after she was awarded that sum of money she deserved to keep her job. All Summers’ did was obey someone who she legitimately believed was a police officer (someone with authority),I feel like any of us could become victims in such…
I decided to do option #2 major case observation and analysis. The online case I decided to do my research on was the Jodi Arias case. I believe the reason I picked this case over the others was this case was very interesting to me. Sure the O.J. Simpson case was a big one, but we all know he got away with murder. The George Zimmerman’s case didn’t last that long, and I felt that I would just find the same information in my research.…
The Mattie T. Consent Decree (Mississippi) Citation MATTIE T., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HENRY JOHNSON, et al., Defendants DC75-31-S Plaintiffs and Defendants The plaintiffs listed in the original case were as follows: Mattie T., Aaron, O., Julius M., Aretha M., Anna M., Carol M., Christopher O., Christine O., James M., Michael E., Johnny W., Erma B., Louise R., James T., Charles P., Glendale P., Sammy Y., William Y., Tommy W., Myrtle R., Stevenson M., Bennett M., Steven J., Jacqueline W., Bennie F., John W. The defendants listed in the original case were as follows: Charles E. Holladay, et al and their successors in office Setting The basis of this case was twenty-six school aged children with disabilities represented by their parents,…
Krouse v. Graham 19 Cal.3d 59, 562 P.2d 1022, 137 Cal. Rptr. 863 Facts: The Krouse family was returning from a grocery shopping trip and their car was parked on the curb. When Elizabeth (the wife) and Vinka Mladinov (neighbor) were returning to shut the door of the car, Graham hits a curb and rear ends the parked car. This results in the hitting the neighbor (Mladinov) and Elizabeth (the mother).…