While Burke argues that Eleanor left a strong precedent on the role of the first lady, she fails to show examples of her legacy in action. In order to complete Burke’s argument, readers should be supplied with adequate information as to how first ladies after Eleanor were influenced by her work and accomplishments. Burke misses an opportunity and does not state which first ladies succeeding Eleanor also held their own press conferences. Burke’s argument could have been sufficiently stronger and more convincing if succeeding first ladies’ causes, charities, and legislation were included. Without proper evidence, solely stating that Eleanor “left a legacy” causes the legitimacy of the argument to lose a large percentage of its
While Burke argues that Eleanor left a strong precedent on the role of the first lady, she fails to show examples of her legacy in action. In order to complete Burke’s argument, readers should be supplied with adequate information as to how first ladies after Eleanor were influenced by her work and accomplishments. Burke misses an opportunity and does not state which first ladies succeeding Eleanor also held their own press conferences. Burke’s argument could have been sufficiently stronger and more convincing if succeeding first ladies’ causes, charities, and legislation were included. Without proper evidence, solely stating that Eleanor “left a legacy” causes the legitimacy of the argument to lose a large percentage of its