International Legal Memorandum Case Study

Decent Essays
Running Head: INTERNAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM

Internal Legal Memorandum
PA299: Associates Capstone in Paralegal Studies
Kynyatta Weaver
Professor: Monica Ross
Kaplan University
Saturday, August 06, 2011

CONFIDENTIAL
Legal Memorandum
TO: Attorney Monica Ross
FROM: Paralegal Kynyatta Weaver
DATE: August 6, 2011
SUBJECT: Personal Injury
FACTS
On April 30, 2008 around 9:30 a.m. an incident involving Shayla Smith occurred at the O&D Family Campground. The question is to whether the campground was negligent when securing the pool area where the incident occurred. Our client is Mary Smith the mother of Shayla Smith. Shayla Smith went to the O& D Family Campground owned by Owen and Dolly Jones, with her friend Tamara and her
…show more content…
Were the owners of O&D Family Campground, Owen and Dolly Jones guilty of negligence by not proving a new lock for the pool gate?
2. Were owners Owen and Dolly Jones negligent by only having signs on display when the pool area was open instead of having them on display at all times?
SHORT
…show more content…
Under the modified comparative negligence of 1986 (735 ILCS 5/2 -1116), the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by the plaintiff’s comparative negligence unless the plaintiff is more than 50% at fault for causing their own injuries. If the plaintiff is more than 50% liable a judgment is then entered on behalf of the defendant.
Swimming Pool and Bathing Beach Act (210 ILCS 125/et seq)
The Department of Public Health issues the construction permits, inspections, and license on an annual basis for all swimming pools except at private residences that are used for the owner of the residence and their guest. This department is responsible for providing safe swimming environments. All pools are required to have a protective barriers (wall, fence, or barrier) the can enclose the entire swimming pool deck area. The barrier is supposed to prevent easy access to the pool area.
RECOMMENDATIONS/

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Under the State's recreational use statute, the owner of a property that permits any person either directly or indirectly without charge the use of the property for recreation purposes does not assume responsibility for any injury incurred. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 411.190. A “charge” refers to the admission price or fee asked in return for invitation or permission to enter or go upon the land.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the conditions and place where the property was found one can infer whether the property was left there intentionally or unintentionally. Benjamin v Lindner, 534 N.W.2d at 407. In Benjamin, while inspecting a plane Benjamin Heath found two packets wrapped in aluminum foil containing $18,000 tied in string and wrapped in handkerchiefs. Id at 403.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, and can prove the plaintiff was trespassing by entering onto the defendant’s property without permission and subsequently injuring themselves by operating the defendant’s tractor. Rule: Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. 657 (1873) Analysis:…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As to Lee Ricks, IV, the Plaintiffs assert claims for negligence and gross negligence and allege that “Defendant Ricks was significantly impaired by hours of drinking alcohol . . . had no business driving a motor vehicle with passengers on a dark golf course” and further failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to turn and avoid a known hazard, failed to timely apply brakes to avoid dropping off the gorge, and drove while intoxicated. As to the Riverbend Defendants, Plaintiffs allege premises liability causes of action. The Plaintiffs allege that a “two-track road” runs from the subdivision through the golf course and dead ends into the San Antonio River gorge.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    GTE Regulation Case Study

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The regulation laws set by states are designed to protect and regulate citizens of the state to avoid damages. The North Carolina regulation that prohibits telephone booth placement at public intersections were designed to avoid any harm that could come to the public due to the placement and proximity of traffic. GTE, Inc, acting on their own accord illegally placed a booth at one of these intersections which led to a pedestrian, Ann, getting injured through a car accident. Ann has rights to compensation over this company for the actions they had done, and GTE showed negligence in this way. GTE, Inc. has a duty to act reasonably and not impart unreasonable risk to others (p.273)…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since bodies of water present a risk of harm that is readily apparent to all, along with the fact that the banks Joel fell into were made of natural conditions, the Thornton Quarry will not satisfy an artificial condition upon the land. Joel Cruz fell into Thornton Quarry, an area filled by rainwater and with earth banks made of limestone and shale. The was being used as a reservoir, “[B]odies of water . . .…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now that Stark vs. Ford Motor Co. has been resolved it is important to review both the ethical and business implications resulting from the decision. In particular, was Indiana’s law just in the judgement of this case or should it be different? I believe Indiana law was reasonable in distributing remedies for contributory negligence because there was material evidence unlike in Whitted vs. General Motor Corporation. In this case, a man whom was in a car crash was injured because his seatbelt broke and therefore did not restrain him. However, the court declared, “Motorist failed to present evidence that seat belt was flawed in its design and failed to illustrate that better design was cost-effective, as required to have maintained cause of action on basis of duty to design product free of flaws that cause injury” Whitted v. General Motors Corporation, (U.S. App.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Background Information In 1986, David H. Lucas paid $975,000 for two residential lots on the Isle of Palms in Charleston County, South Carolina barrier island, intending to build single family homes such as those on the immediately adjacent parcels. During that time, the lots weren’t subject to the State’s coastal zone building permit requirements. In 1988, the state legislature enacted the Beachfront Management Act. This act prohibited Lucas from building any permanent habitable structures in his parcels.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a socioeconomic system of free enterprise such as the system found in the United States, the legal issues surrounding product liability are very unique and need to be examined carefully. Businesses are highly susceptible to the claims of product liability because their products must be safe for consumer usage, creating the structure of a successful market system. This market works because businesses can compete for market share with the consumers through product quality, but it also fails because consumers go after them on false allegations because they see an infinite gold mine of compensatory damages. If a business creates a product with a defect, they should be held liable. However, some products simply cannot be made safer without losing their purpose, such as a knife or a hot cup of coffee.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Now if we looked at causation we see that the construction company breach in their duty of care caused Bob’s injures. If they would have closed off the area Bob would have not entered the area and gotten hurt. Now for the last element Damages, which is the injures bob got from when he fell and got hurt from some scrap metal. Which if the construction company had closed of the area probably he wouldn’t have gotten injured. So, as we see all four elements of negligence has been satisfied.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A: A Duty of Care Is Owed To the Plaintiff 1. Foreseeable Plaintiff Test(Reasonable Foreseeability Test) As an expert, the cardiologist owed a duty of care to the patient and must live up to the standard of competence as one would expect from a member of their profession. The cardiologist was not in the right state of mind as he was having a bad day and was sleepy, therefore, the injury of the plaintiff was reasonably foreseeable. There was a proximity between the parties due to the fact that the defendant should have been aware that his actions of doing the operation in that state posed a risk of danger to his patient.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the best steps that you can take if you have been injured in a slip and fall situation due to a property owner's negligence is to hire a personal injury attorney, typically because they can take numerous steps to strengthen your case and get you compensated for the injury. Listed below are just two of the many reasons to hire a personal injury attorney for a slip and fall injury. They Will Gather Evidence Of The Property Owner's Negligence The first and most important reason that you should hire a personal injury attorney for this type of case is that they will take steps to gather evidence of the property owner's negligence.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Possession Injustice

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court will probably find that Bill and Sandie’s possession of the Green was “open and notorious.” This is one of the five elements of adverse possession. Possession is “open and notorious” when the adverse claimant’s use of the property can be observed, by another, through the erection of a structure or participation in activities that can be seen. Appalachian Regional Healthcare. Inc. v. Royal Crown Bottling Co., 824 S.W.2d 878 (Ky. 1992); Kentucky WCTU v. Thomas, 412 S.W.2d 869 (Ky. 1967); Elsea v. Day, 448 S.W.3d 259 (Ky. App. 2014).…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Duty Of Reasonable Care

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Under Illinois law, the insureds, as the premises owner and premise occupier, owed a duty to the plaintiff to use reasonable care under the circumstances regarding the state of the premises. The duty of reasonable care under the circumstances which an owner or occupier of land owes to authorized entrants does not include any of the following: a duty to warn of or otherwise take reasonable steps to protect such entrants from conditions on the premises that are known to the entrant, are open and obvious, or can reasonably be expected to be discovered by the entrant. In this case, the insureds owed a duty of care to provide sufficient lighting for the exterior stairs. Based on the information we have at this time, it would appear the insureds…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The impact caused the neighbor to fly 20 feet into an embankment causing her injuries and hurled Elizabeth under the defendant’s vehicle resulting in her death. The husband, Benjamin sustained injuries and ‘mental and emotional’ disturbances. Defendant filed an appeal. Procedural History: Multiple plaintiffs filed 3 different cases against defendant Graham.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays