Vengeance In Shakespeare's Henry V

Improved Essays
Shakespeare’s seminal classic Henry V is the culmination of the Henriad tetralogy, and is an allusion to the aphorism that “the pen is mightier than the sword,” for despite being renowned as a warrior king in the Bard’s tale, King Henry fought his battles with the mettle of his rhetoric rather than the metal of his blade. This can be seen in the way in which he utilises orotund oratory to intimidate the citizens of Harfleur into surrendering, but perhaps his most monumental use of magniloquence was when wooing the heart of Katherine. Love is a battlefield unto itself, and the way that Henry V wickedly twisted his words was analogous to the skill that the English soldiers displayed off-stage, on the battlefields of Agincourt. There are a number …show more content…
In verse, new lines are begun to permit the use of a specific metre, most commonly iambic pentameter in Shakespeare’s works. It is seen as a more elevated, more “noble” form of language when compared to prose, and Shakespeare commonly used prose for working-class and comic characters. However, despite the scene being set in the French court, the passage in Act V Scene II from lines 97 to 263 is written in prose, not verse. The engagement with a wider range of demographics built a rapport between the audience and Harry so that they could enjoy and empathise more with his suit of Katherine. Throughout the passage, Shakespeare also utilised many complex rhetorical devices. Exaggeration often carries the connotations of overestimation, but Henry hyperbolised an under-estimation of his skill with words, both in English, “I’ faith, Kate, my wooing is fit for thy understanding. I am glad thou canst speak no better English,” (V. ii. 120-123) and in French “I shall never move thee in French, unless it be to laugh at me. ”(V. ii. 178-179) This is a similar trick to the prologue at the beginning of the play, where Shakespeare intentionally subverts our expectations of the quality. When Henry does this, it makes him seem more humble, and his keen wordplay is seen as more effective. The hyperbole is just that, however, as Shakespeare portrayed Henry with a keen command of language by using pun “Fair Katherine, and most fair,” (V. ii. 102) and ploce. “If thou would have such a one, take me. And take me, take a soldier. Take a soldier, take a king.” (V. ii. 159-162) As well as a keen command of language, Henry utilised convoluted logic when confronted by Katherine. “Ô bon Dieu! Les langues des hommes sont pleines de tromperies.” (V. ii. 115) was an astute observation on her behalf, as Henry wickedly twisted his arguments to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Patrick Henry’s effective diction demonstrates a unification in the colonies to break away from Britain. This is seen through his use of restatement, logos, and pathos. His diction represents his passion for desiring to get the colony attached from Britain. Henry uses restatement to appeal to the colonists.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry states, “Sir we are not weak, if we make proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power.” The verbal techniques and appeals were used successfully in Henry’s speech at the Virginia House of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The logos contribution of Henry’s address makes use of solid facts to convince the people of Virginia that fighting or slavery are the only possible outcomes of their meeting. He uses this as a fear factor to persuade the people that fighting is the only way to maintain their freedom. These logical facts are seen when Henry states, “Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Henry’s speech, Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death, metaphoric and other rhetorical devices are used to motivate and to spark the emotions of his audience. Patrick Henry states in his speech, “...I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven which I revere above all the earthly kings” (Paragraph 1). Henry uses juxtaposition to state his belief that a king is no one compared to a God. He uses this example to explain how they should rather be following the wishes of God or religion instead of blindly following the wishes of purely a man.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The principal thing Henry did when giving his discourse has he complimented his adversaries, so as to pick up their appreciation and trust. Since the group of onlookers regards Henry, they will be all the more eager to listen to what it is he needs to say. Another technique that Patrick uses is that of allusions. By mentioning well-known sources which are common and known by the majority of the audience, Patrick establishes credibility. By insinuating the Bible, Henry tries to legitimize his declaration of protection of divine.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V told them that not matter what humility they were born in, today, would make them noble. It was presented that all men at home safe in their beds would, “curse themselves for not having been here, and think less of their own manhood when they listen to the stories of those who fought with us here on St. Crispin’s Day.” He presented himself honestly but still, at the same time manipulated the crowd. Not in a deceitful way, but stating his opinion or idea with power. Henry used his speech to not only persuade, but to present himself as an unstoppable force to other kingdoms so they dare not attack him.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the drama, Goldman uses idiolect to vary the personalities of the characters. He especially utilizes the idiolect and thought processes of England’s nobility in order to show the varying levels of knowledge in treaties, land, and power. Henry II, being the King of England, displays a great sense of knowledge in the status of his empire as well as how to negotiate with neighboring countries. For example, when meeting with King Philip of France, Henry began the negotiations, stating, “Your grievances, as we have understood them, have to do with Princess Alais and her dowry” (13). Henry’s professional tone and use of political terms, such as “dowry”, project a sense of confidence that gives England the status of being flexible in negotiations,…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like when he told his men to slay their French prisoners, he did this believing it was justice for the French war crime of slaying the English boys. This may not have been Henry’s best choice, however he is still a man, he made a mistake and he repented for it. This choice of King Henry had led the English to winning Agincourt, on that Saint…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Shakespeare personifies King Henry’s need to maintain control of the situation through rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?/ Shall we by treason an indent with fears/” This reveals to the audience that because of King Henry 's paranoia he needs to ask constant questions to assure himself that his followers are still loyal to him furthermore the rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?” serves the purpose of manipulating blunt into thinking that Mortimer is a traitorous coward. Shakespeare 's use of intimidating tone, religious allusion and rhetorical questions shows how paranoia leads individuals to manipulate politician situations in order to maintain control over power and leadership…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What ended up mattering most was Catherine. The goal of this paper is to elucidate these changes within Henry and those with whom he had relationships with. Concerning the war, Henry’s casual, careless attitude deteriorated throughout. In Book I, it’s apparent that he doesn’t care much about the war.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With words such as “thee,” “thy,” and “thine,” it is clear that language plays a significant role in society during the Shakespearean era. While prose is usually spoken by those of the lower class, poetry is the language that only the well-educated posses. Those who are better educated, and thus speak in poetry, have more benefits than those who speak in prose. The afterward effects of Sly’s interchange between prose and poetry, Grumio’s usage of prose, and Tranio’s poetic language depict the power one has depending on the speech they employ in The Taming of the Shrew, by William Shakespeare.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love’s Labour’s Lost is, perhaps, Shakespeare’s most adventurous play, in terms of the language used. For years, scholars have been fascinated by the way Shakespeare plays with language in this script, pushing past its conventions and rules to transform words into art. In his 1965 essay, Love’s Labour’s Lost: A Wantoning with Words, James Calderwood explains that the language found in this play is unlike that of any other piece written by Shakespeare. Calderwood writes that the language used becomes “an autonomous symbolic system whose value, somewhat like that of pure mathematics, lies less in its relevance to reality than in its intrinsic fascination” (pg. 317). This fascination with language in Love’s Labour’s…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, the literary devices used within Henry's speech are diction, pathos, and parallelism. The diction that Henry uses in his speech impacts how the audience interprets his message. The entirety of the speech has an overall formality to it because of Henry's usage of the words sir and gentlemen. This tone may have impacted the audience's judgement of Henry's speech in the fact that people will listen more intently when shown with more respect. Henry uses the word "slavery" emphasize the unfairness of British colonization (Lines 3, 9).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 1; pg. 2 "From this little distance the many fires, with the black forms of men passing to and fro before the crimson rays, made weird and satanic effects" Chapter 2; pg. 16 " From across the river the red eyes were still peering" Chapter 2; pg. 13" Reactions, opinions, or connections to this passage: I think that Henry is very brave and full of courage. I also feel that even though Henry might be in danger he will be doing his country a great honor.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays