Machiavelli And The Prince Character Analysis

Decent Essays
This essay is based on my understanding on Shakespeare’s King Lear and Machiavelli’s The Prince. In this essay I will be focusing on the nature of themes and blindness, love and kinship. William Shakespeare was a great English writer who has written various famous plays such as – King Lear, Romeo & Juliet and Macbeth. He got married at the age of 18 in 1582 and died in 1609 when his last sonnets were published. Shakespearean tragedy was originated from Greek drama.
On the other side, The Prince was written by Niccolo Machiavelli. He was born on May 3, 1469 at Florence. He was an Italian historian and one of the most well-known political writers (Rennert 2008, p.1). In 1500, he was sent to Louis XII of France on a mission and then after that to Caesar Borgia, the lord of Romagna, at Urbino. The Prince was written in 1513 by Machiavelli in which he has written about his own views of the government of the state (Rennert 2008, p.1). Machiavelli’s main objective was to get power and develop using that. “He turned politics into a technique of power and
…show more content…
His eldest daughter Goneril flatters him and gets the powers and half of the kingdom. Regan follows her sister and gets her share as well, however Cordelia is shown as her honest daughter in the play and remains silent which makes the king furious. This represents the moral blindness in the play. Gloucester is also shown blind in love of his children, Edmund and Edgar, where he is unable to see Edmund’s betrayal towards his brother Edgar. Physical blindness is shown in the play where Gloucester’s eyes were poked by Regan’s husband, the Duke of Cornwall. The theme of love and flatter in King Lear is related to Cordelia vs. Goneril and Reagan. The King and Gloucester in the play are portrayed blind as they see only what they want to and are easily persuaded by other

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Vincent Barnett's article that interprets Machiavelli's "The Prince" was intriguing. Many readers were shocked about Machiavelli's guide to be a leader, but he was only telling the truth. To be a successful leader, Machiavelli proposes that "the end justifies the means. " Machiavelli's critical manual was meant to appeal to leaders to reach their goal for the greater good.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It appears that Machiavelli’s purpose in writing The Prince was to eventually gift it to Lorenzo the Magnificent as a means of securing good favor from him. As to why he chose to write a novel as opposed to the more commonplace tribute of either gold or some other finery, the most feasible conclusion is that Machiavelli wished to indirectly guide Lorenzo in how he thinks his job should be done. Machiavelli wanted Lorenzo to implement the strategies detailed in The Prince so that Lorenzo may eventually garner even more power and prestige; in the hopes that one day Lorenzo would repay Machiavelli’s kindness by relieving him of his suffering and misfortune. In terms of more noble goals, Machiavelli hoped that the Medicis would use his knowledge…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, Machiavelli gives an instructional guide on how to gain and keep political power. This instruction manual gives essential strategies on how to achieve political dominance; if one uses these strategies to their full capability, then one achieves complete political dominance over their citizens and any opposition that may rise. Using Machiavelli’s writing is essential for political domination. President Trump’s political and professional career can be framed with The Prince, specifically on his inherited principality, the strategies on keeping these principalities, and how he is not using Machiavelli’s teachings to their full potential.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolo Machiavelli in the early 16th century in order to once again get into favor of the ruling family of Florence: The Medici’s. Publically, the goal of The Prince was to inform a ruler (Lorenzo de’ Medici) how to maintain power and stay in good favor of the subjects they rule over. Because of the many contradictions between The Prince and The Discourses, countless scholars have been perplexed by what Machiavelli’s true intentions were. Although it seems like Machiavelli is writing a set of instructions for Lorenzo de’ Medici to become a good prince, I believe that he is trying to sabotage Leonardo in order to reinstitute a republic. Throughout his letter to Lorenzo, Machiavelli proposes many ideas that on the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not Like Father Not Like Daughter: An Analysis of Shakespeare’s “King Lear” William Shakespeare is the father of playwriting and is one of the most famous people in English Literature. He was known to break and create boundaries; such as in his other works Romeo and Juliet, he exposed the monarchy and explains that love has no bounds. One must understand the historical background of William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear”, to comprehend King Lear and Cordelia reversed roles as parent and child. Shakespeare wrote “King Lear” about a father who divided his kingdom among his three daughters based on who “loved” him the most.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The deceit from Goneril and Regan are no help to anyone, including themselves. They both turn their backs on their family and betray their father’s trust. Both are willing to hurt and/or kill anyone to get power, all with disregard to family. Their cruelty is unacceptable and it shows that they care very little for their father and only care about getting more power. Lear feels like he has no home because his two eldest daughters have exiled him from their homes.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is shown through the use of verse and hyperbole of “I love you more than word can wield the matter” where the greed for land is what drives Goneril to say nice words.. However, the irony of lear failing to differentiate authenticity or deception of love results in misjudging Cordelia for feigned love, instigating social, personal and self-conflicts for both lear, his daughters and the society. This plot drive will not only foreshadow complications but also result in the sacrifice of Cordelia and Gloucester. Shakespeare’s use of epiphany of Lear, is shown by misperceiving Goneril’s love with flattery which is portrayed through Goneril’s plosive language, contrasting the poetic language in verse present in the division of the kingdom, exemplifying Goneril’s greed for land the deceptive love expressed for Lear. This parallels with the double plot of Gloucester…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays