Shakespeare And Branagh's Adaptation Of Henry V

Superior Essays
The representation of Henry V has been creatively re-shaped to address contemporary contexts, particularly reforming the universal concepts of leadership and war. Shakespeare’s original text constructs Henry’s persona to reflect the Elizabethan context, vitalising Henry’s suitability to the throne through his Machiavellian traits and patriotic attitude towards war. However, Branagh’s adaptation of the play following the Vietnam and Falklands War renders this character as humanised, thus pursuing an anti-war agenda. These distinct portrayals of Henry are identifiable through their emulation in both texts, as illustrated through language devices and film techniques.

Shakespeare examines the complex nature of leadership through the character
…show more content…
Shakespeare’s representation of Henry V shaped war as patriotic and courageous, attributed primarily to the previous success of England in the Hundred Years’ War. In order to emphasise the triumph of nationalism war achieves, Shakespeare shaped Henry as a rousing and inspirational character preceding the Battle of Agincourt. Henry proclaims his outlook on war as he asserts, “But he’ll remember with advantages, what feats he did that day.” The effective foreshadowing incorporated by Shakespeare enabled Henry to project the fulfilment his troops would attain through partaking in such battle, thus communicating to his audience the significance of war in gaining such pride. Shakespeare continues to emphasise the patriotic sense of war through Henry by signifying the familial relationship formed as a result. As reflected in his speech, Henry proclaims, “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.” Through the effective incorporation of emotive language and the rule of thirds, Shakespeare effectively reiterates the united brotherhood war enabled, thus persuading his troops and his audience implicitly to perceive war as an embodiment of pride and courage. These language devices utilised by Shakespeare in the St Crispin’s Day Speech portray his perception of war as patriotic, clearly an embodiment of the success granted during the Elizabethan

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With an incoming invasion of her country by Spain in 1588, Queen Elizabeth stood in the city of Tilbury and gave a final motivational speech to her troops before battle. Queen Elizabeth used this speech as a means of sparking hope and courage in her troops, motivating them to fight. At the same time she crushes any doubts to her ability to rule and reminds her troops of their duties to the country. Queen Elizabeth appealed to the emotions of her to troops,inspiring them through religious allusions and impassioned tone. Through the use of possessive pronouns, vivid imagery, first person point of view she is able to legitimize her leadership to her doubters, troops and other nations.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As one analyzes both How to Read Literature Like a Professor and the character speech from Shakespeare’s Henry VIII, a connection can be distinguished between Professor Foster’s guide in chapter 20 about seasons and the speech’s course. Throughout the speech, the seasons seem to guide our anonymous narrator -who seems to stand for Henry VIII - through a passage of time that leads him to a fall that he cannot return from- the death of his pride and reign. Throughout the speech, the seasons are able to characterize the atmosphere and tone of the time, making the speech seem more dramatic and impactful to Henry VIII’s lasting legacy. Towards the beginning of the character speech, the language Shakespeare uses guides the audience’s attention towards…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V's Speech Analysis

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry V said, “For him, today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother”. This had an impact on the men due to the fact that the people fighting along Henry’s side varied in status, but with this quote it made them feel united. It was important for Henry to enlighten his men to feel united and appreciated, therefore, they’d be more motivated during the fight. By making the men feel more motivated and bringing them together there was more enthusiasm within them making it a more relaxed and comfortable situation to be in together, making sure no one felt left…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolution Vs Rebellion

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mr. President, as we speak redcoats have taken over Boston. I was there as they invaded our homes and they murdered our friends. This is a serious matter. We must not treat it lightly. This insult to us as citizens of Britain, should anger us.…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, he try’s to show them that Britain are not as honest as they make themselves out to be. He tells them, “Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare at your feet.” He says this to show that Britain cannot be trusted. Patrick Henry explains how everything they have been doing isn’t working, and they need to try a new strategy, and the best idea for them is war. He says, “We must fight, I repeat it sir, we must fight.”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Powerful individuals represent themselves in manipulative ways, to create political situations that benefit them. King Henry IV Part 1, a history play by Shakespeare typifies this idea. Context has had an influential role in how shakespeare uses dramatic techniques to shape the characterisation of King Henry, Hal and Hotspur. The desired political situations manufactured by individuals in Henry IV Part 1 all stem from power, personal greed and pride. Those who seek power and obtain it through unjust means often develop paranoia, which leads them to manipulate political situations in order to maintain that power.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What ended up mattering most was Catherine. The goal of this paper is to elucidate these changes within Henry and those with whom he had relationships with. Concerning the war, Henry’s casual, careless attitude deteriorated throughout. In Book I, it’s apparent that he doesn’t care much about the war.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Essay Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, Hamlet (1892) is a prevailing text, which encompasses perennial concerns not only applicable to the elizabethan era, but also to our contemporary society, enabling us as a critical audience to successfully engage with Hamlet as a character. As a result of corruption, Hamlet is perceived as an afflicted character struggling to live in a world of complex appearances and paradoxical actions. Consequently, his overwhelming desire and reason for filial revenge is instigated, reflecting the intricate nature of the human condition in the undertaking of his vengeance. Moreover, these prominent concerns are cohesively resonated throughout the text, thus establishing textual integrity and further heightening the plays enduring effect.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under Henry’s leadership, England proceeds to lead a “band of brothers” to win a victory against unimaginable odds while the prince of France suffers shame and his men scatter. Henry V, portrays the theme that the most important aspect of a leader is humility. Both the way that he interacts with his inferiors and the way that he trusts God instead of himself display the extent of Henry’s humility. The Dauphine contrasts with this picture of righteous leadership by using rash judgment and puffing himself above even those that are wiser than him. Shakespeare uses the prince as foil and picture of Henry’s former self when he was still a prince and relying on his father to show responsibility.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s Ideas of Identity William Shakespeare questions identity throughout his works, but this theme is especially apparent in Henry IV, Part 1. Typically, Shakespeare will have characters question themselves and their importance to show identity; however, he expands on this in several ways in this play. This struggle relates to the society that Shakespeare was accustomed to, yet this struggle is still faced today. Identity is something that people still struggle with because of the numerous ways it can be defined. One’s identity can be linked to their appearance, name, personality, occupation, race, or political views.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The rise of Fascism and the Second World War made a profound impact upon historical films on Tudor England. This essay will show this through an analysis of the appropriate films and scholarly literature that exists. It will begin by discussing how film studios in Britain and ‘Hollywood’ begun using historical films on Tudor England to portray an anti-Nazi sentiment to a wide audience. It will become evident that some film studios during this period did not wish to cause offence, and therefore utilised historical films on Tudor England to put forward their own political agenda. This essay will then examine how these historical films on Tudor England became central to the propaganda mission.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “To Be Or Not To Be” speech in the play Hamlet displays the difficulty Hamlet has dealing with his emotions. Both Kenneth Branagh and Michael Almereyda’s interpretation of the speech capture the powerful soliloquy giving us a unique window introducing a deeper understanding of Hamlet. Both Interpretations give varying expression and emotions, however Kenneth Branagh produced a more vivid, and emotional recreation of the scene with his superior use of camera angles, body structure, music, and a more fitting setting. The scenery and overall characterization of Hamlet in Kenneth Branagh’s interpretation complements Hamlet's character and his emotional situation.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli, author of The Prince, once wrote, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are”. Machiavelli, one whose name is synonymous with manipulation and trickery, argues that an individual should do whatever he/she deems necessary to keep power. During his time, his policies shocked the world; however, upon further examination, Machiavelli simply states a trait of human nature. The idea of deceitful autocratic rule has been present in the form of hierarchies and dictatorships and is even seen in 1 Henry IV, which is set 200 years before the creation of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Through masking one’s self, one exploits and deceives though at the cost of one’s morals and virtues.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Hal makes his promise to his father that he will end the rebellion, William Shakespeare tells his audiences that the prince starts his transformation to become an ideal king in Henry IV, Part 1. These lines illustrated Hal’s plan to become an ideal king with some concrete steps, such as meeting Hotspur on the battlefield and washing his shame with the blood on his face. It is hard to believe that a prince who spends all his time with highwaymen can come up with a serious plan and quickly identify a chance to express it to the king. Moreover, Hal is given a variety of options to start his transformation to become an ideal king, but his response indicates that he will only achieve this goal by regaining his “honor” on the battlefield. What are the factors contribute to Hal’s decision to make this promise and how do they reflect the “honor” that Hal is trying to obtain?…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays