I know individuals who have experienced the type of harassment described by persons in a position of power over them. The mistreatment experienced was disguised through the misuse of legitimate policies and procedures that corresponded to work-related tasks. Additional behaviors exhibited by these ‘persons of power’ included excessive scrutiny of work, public degradation of character, and inaccurate documentation of work performance. In many cases, these circumstances made the harassment difficult for others to recognize, led to unsuccessful attempts in speaking out to stop the harassment, and the futile outcome of those efforts often increased the sabotage attempts against the individual. The perpetrator’s actions “negatively influenced group dynamics, perceptions and behaviors”, and ultimately, the issue was only “resolved” by silencing the victim through fear, intimidation, stigmatization, or exhaustion (Hutchinson et al., 2010, p.
I know individuals who have experienced the type of harassment described by persons in a position of power over them. The mistreatment experienced was disguised through the misuse of legitimate policies and procedures that corresponded to work-related tasks. Additional behaviors exhibited by these ‘persons of power’ included excessive scrutiny of work, public degradation of character, and inaccurate documentation of work performance. In many cases, these circumstances made the harassment difficult for others to recognize, led to unsuccessful attempts in speaking out to stop the harassment, and the futile outcome of those efforts often increased the sabotage attempts against the individual. The perpetrator’s actions “negatively influenced group dynamics, perceptions and behaviors”, and ultimately, the issue was only “resolved” by silencing the victim through fear, intimidation, stigmatization, or exhaustion (Hutchinson et al., 2010, p.