“There is at least a prospect that offenders, given treatment within the community and appropriate supervision, can carry on productive lives without endangering people around them (Nico Savidge).” This is important because some people feel like when a sex offender receives treatment and therapy then he can live a normal life without endangering anyone else. This statement really helps me prove my argument about sex offender laws about where they live and work. If they receive treatment and it helps then they should be able to live a regular life after. “This article talks about how a church let a sex offender work with children, driving them to unsupervised events (Nico Savidge).” This statement is important because, a church is giving a registered sex offender leadway and end up regretting their decision. This proves my argument that the laws about sex offenders are fair. They should not be able to work close with children. “Two other men have also pleaded guilty of sexual assault charges (Nico Savidge).” This is important for my argument because, this is illegal since these men are registered sex offenders, they are in violation of the law that states that they can’t work around children. This doesn’t prove my argument to be true. This statement makes it look like laws about sex offenders are not fair, and they should be able to work around children. Therefore sex offender laws about …show more content…
Therefore mental hospitalization is the best choice for a sex offender to go, instead of being imprisoned. Sex Offender Laws should be more stringent. Therefore sex offender laws about where they work should be more stringent and enforced more among communities. Do you think keeping a sex offender under strict surveillance and treatment in a mental hospital the best choice for