In his article, “Serve or Fail,” Dave Eggers, a well-known editor and author, tries to resolve a perplexing social dilemma: Under what circumstances is it acceptable for students to dedicate the entirety of their 4 years of college experience completing and excelling in their school work without a proposed break of some sort to help replenish their minds, bodies, and souls? In addition, he suggests that we should not only minimize the school year by a year, but incorporate community service into the school system. His view towards this situation are justified throughout this composition by his use of effective logos, ethos, and pathos. Eggers has a valid proposal towards his audience, but he fails to elaborate on more solutions to further
…show more content…
He states that school is entirely too lengthy and that there are many “hours in need of killing—as opposed to thinking about giving a few hours of these hours to our communities one way or another—colleges should consider instituting a service requirement for graduation” (Eggers 180). Egger’s evidence for this claim is an incident from his studies upon this topic. He conveys that this will be very beneficial to students, organizations, and schools because . Appealing to reader’s emotions, Eggers. He ask,. “Do they deserve time off? Well, yes and no” in favor of students (Eggers 180). According to Egger’s logic, substantially, students would need to acquire more time towards sleeping and relaxing, rather than devoting all ones time towards studying and class work. This inquiry is a very effective judgment which may, perhaps, be a very logical, ethos, that he has issued thoroughly in the …show more content…
Although he has a valid claim, he failed within his logos. Eggers is not consistent with his idea. In this article, he verifies that, students no longer need to have an academic year of four years instead, three, with community service. Prior to that, he notifies his audience that community service withholds power towards being accounted for a class. Therefore, he saves his logos by justifying that it is not necessarily a factor that students have to have. It is optional. Complimenting this claim, he further suggests that even if only half of students, world-wide, become involved in community service, that is still enough people to carry this out as an official quota in the school systems ( Eggers
He states that school is entirely too lengthy and that there are many “hours in need of killing—as opposed to thinking about giving a few hours of these hours to our communities one way or another—colleges should consider instituting a service requirement for graduation” (Eggers 180). Egger’s evidence for this claim is an incident from his studies upon this topic. He conveys that this will be very beneficial to students, organizations, and schools because . Appealing to reader’s emotions, Eggers. He ask,. “Do they deserve time off? Well, yes and no” in favor of students (Eggers 180). According to Egger’s logic, substantially, students would need to acquire more time towards sleeping and relaxing, rather than devoting all ones time towards studying and class work. This inquiry is a very effective judgment which may, perhaps, be a very logical, ethos, that he has issued thoroughly in the …show more content…
Although he has a valid claim, he failed within his logos. Eggers is not consistent with his idea. In this article, he verifies that, students no longer need to have an academic year of four years instead, three, with community service. Prior to that, he notifies his audience that community service withholds power towards being accounted for a class. Therefore, he saves his logos by justifying that it is not necessarily a factor that students have to have. It is optional. Complimenting this claim, he further suggests that even if only half of students, world-wide, become involved in community service, that is still enough people to carry this out as an official quota in the school systems ( Eggers