Servant Leader Vs Servant Leadership

Finally, a servant leader has the tendency to serve others by mentoring. A servant leader finds a way to enhance a talented individual’s skills and help motivate the individual by applying strength and knowledge. According to Peter Senge (2004), one-third of the fortune 500 companies have disappeared and the average lifetime for the largest enterprises is less than 40 years. Many have wondered why these fortune 500 companies disappeared. The answer to the dilemma is the companies that survive have somewhat succeeded in creating a “learning organization” where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire (Senge, 2004). Those companies that focus on staying with the traditional approach and lack any innovation tend to disintegrate in time because their competitors were able to emulate the process and improve the traditional business concepts. Furthermore, a lack of additional training …show more content…
According to John Maxwell (2007), raising leadership ability without increasing dedication can increase original effectiveness by six hundred percent (p.1). A servant leader is effective in the sense that it reinforces the nature of the individual profession and calls upon its noble instincts. Furthermore, a servant leader celebrates individual success with team-based rewards that encourage team cooperation. The differences between a manager and a leader is that a manager manages the quality of the process where performance is based on the effectiveness of the productivity. In contrast, a leader focuses on the success of the individual, especially the servant leader. A servant leader values the individual performance and based the individual effectiveness on extensive discussions from the employee’s feedback. Furthermore, a servant leader takes the time to discuss the employee’s career development and assist them in advancing their