Separate Car Act Case Study

Decent Essays
Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The theory failed, and the judge found that Louisiana could enforce this law. Plessy was convicted and fined. Tourgée argued that the law required “separate but equal accommodations” was unconstitutional. When Judge John H. Ferguson ruled against him, Plessy applied for the State Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition and certiorari. Although the court upheld the state law, it granted Plessy’s petition for a writ of error that would enable him to appeal the case to the Supreme Court.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Brown v. Board of Education and Plessy v. Ferguson are two historical events that have had an outstanding impact to the United States. In the next few paragraphs I will explain a few main points about what happened during their cases. Such as what the cases are about, why they chose to create the case and how it’s affecting the society, the decision for the majority and minority’s decision on how the case will take place for the citizens, and never less, the key precedents. Furthermore, I will go on to explain about the Plessy v. Ferguson case first. Plessy v. Ferguson was an astonishing case on wanting to be “separate but equal”.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued that the fourteenth amendment was being ignored as Plessy’s rights to “equal protection” were being neglected. While reflecting the majority decision of this case, Justice Henry Billings Brown stated that the ‘separate but equal doctrine” depended on the status of equality of all races, the usage of different facilities were a matter for society itself, not the courts. Also that the “…Laws… requiring their separation.. do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race.” The United Stated Supreme Court ended up ruling the Louisiana Separate Car Law perfectly constitutional. After losing the case, Homer Plessy was charged $25 for the violation of the law of Louisiana.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Slaughterhouse Cases: The state of Louisiana made a monopoly of slaughtering operations and sold it to one specific company, eliminating all other companies against their will. The companies said that since it was not voluntary, it was considered involuntary servitude, and infringed on their equal protection rights and also burdened their access to liberty and property without due process. The first section forbids the landing or slaughtering of animals whose flesh is indented for food within certain boundaries. Another section authorizes the company to establish and erect within certain territory, one large scale slaughterhouse is to exist and the rest are not allowed business within those territories. Also, all other stock landings and slaughterhouses are to be closed as a result of this case.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case is significant by that it tests whether people of different races can marry each other. At the time, a white male and a black female getting married was unthinkable and was looked upon with contempt. There were actual state laws that prevented whites from marrying blacks. This case discusses how Virginia's law to segregate blacks and whites from marrying each other was eventually overturned by the superior court because of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protections Clause.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ferguson, is one of the most important Supreme Court decision made dealing with civil rights issues. The Court ruled on the concept of 'separate but equal ' and set back the civil rights movement and race relations in the United States. In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races (). " The law, required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for black and white passengers, with one stipulation that the cars be equal in service, the law even went further in banning whites from sitting in black railroad cars and blacks in white railroad cars. The law penalized any passenger or railway employees for violating its terms of the segregated rail road cars.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Black Codes

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ferguson was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme court that upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilitates under the doctrine of separate but equal. It stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African-American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a Jim Crow car, breaking a Louisiana law. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Court ruled that a state law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between whites and blacks did not conflict with the 13th and14th Amendments. Restrictive legislation based on race continued following the Plessy decision, its reasoning not overturned until Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka in…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction unsuccessful due to the Hayes-Tilden Compromise of the Compromise of 1877. The Compromise of 1877 refers to a acknowledged informal, unwritten deal that settled the controversial 1876 U.S. Presidential election, considered the second "corrupt bargain", and over general assembly ("Radical") Reconstruction. Through it, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over Democrat samuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would take away the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Everglade State and American state. African Americans lost their rights and have become sharecroppers due to this. Jim Crow Laws were passed to suppress the African…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, Homer Plessy was arrested when he sat in a whites only railroad car because he was only one-eight black. In 1896, the government passed the Jim Crow laws which stated the idea of “separate but equal” based in Plessy v. Ferguson. The government believed that by providing the separated facilities, it would provided “peace and order” to the community. It showed that the government wanted people to understand that they tried to solve the problem to maintain equality by separating. The actions that government made did not actually provide equality for African Americans.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A high school student in Grosse Ile Township, Michigan, filed a lawsuit Monday, after a police officer cited her for failing to undergo a breathalyzer test without a search warrant. Casey Guthrie is challenging a local ordinance and a state law that both allow officers to perform Breathalyzers on those under 21 years old if they have a reasonable cause to believe alcohol has been consumed. Under the Michigan Liquor Control Code, those who refuse to undergo the test are cited for a civil infraction and may be ordered to pay a fine of no more than $100. The lawsuit comes out of an incident in May, when Casey was a passenger in a vehicle pulled over by Sergeant Ken Pelland.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The argument for separate but equal precludes the notion that, separate but equal is not inherently connected to the American system of racially-based slavery. However, I find this claim to contradict and violate the very nature of the Thirteenth Amendment. In segregating the two races of the nation, we draw on the previous caste of bondage. We inherit the distinctions and prejudices of this previous system in our attempts to regulate race relations, to segregate the lives of Whites from those of Blacks. Our inheritance of prejudice, of supremical thought, will continue to infinitely exist if we allow for the complete segregation of these two races.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the only dissenting opinion in the ruling, Justice Johns Marshall Harlan, he agreed with Plessy that the act was in fact in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment by imposing a badge of servitude. Harlan was an individual who decried the views of the Ku Klux Klan—white supremacy. Harlan went on to note “Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CAR-T Case Study

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages

    There are many ways to help solve the problem of Leukemia. One solution is CAR-T. CAR-T is a gene therapy for leukemia. It is made from the patient's own immune system. When they tried the treatment on kids and adults it worked, really well. The only downside to this is that it is very expensive; 475,000 for the treatment.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Homer Plessy Guilt

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although some may argue that Homer plessy was a man of guilt for standing up for what he believed in, homer plessy gave a committed input. In this essay you will read of how one man standing up can change it for everyone else who is affected. There were two different sides of the story at the time and even if he wasn’t defended, Homer plessy stood up for everyone who was being stepped on. He tried for better for those who were separated from those who were treated better. He made everyone hear his spoken claim.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among the grievances were exclusion from a hotel dining room; refusal of admission to a New York City opera; segregation to lower-quality seats in a theater; and removal from a train car set aside for white women. All of these indignities were violations of rights enumerated in the 1875 legislation. The Supreme Court analyzed these cases in view of the Fourteenth Amendment and concluded the Amendment was not designed to apply to private citizens or private organizations, but only to the federal and state governments. This decision resulted in the Civil Rights Act of 1875 being invalidated, and opened the doors to blatant discrimination by businesses and individuals. John Marshall Harlan, who was a supporter of civil rights, was the lone voice of dissent on the Court, which ruled 8-1 against the petitioners.…

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision on this case affected the decision on the Plessy v. Ferguson case by saying the case did in fact contradict the Fourteenth Amendment and no one is equal if they are separated. According to “FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.” (Findlaw, caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/347/483.html), " Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected. " This means that no matter what the decision was in the Plessy v. Ferguson case that Brown v. Board of Education changed the precedent and if any one tried to go against this final decision, they could be…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays