Senator Beveridge Supporting Imperialism Speech

Improved Essays
Senator Beveridge Supporting Imperialism Speech Sovereignty is not given, it is taken. Sovereignty is a power to lead one state. The Philippines was once headed by America during the Spanish American War. Back in 1900, Senator Beveridge gave a speech defending America’s right to subjugate savage peoples and foreign governments. Senator Beveridge was a senator from Indiana from March 4, 1899 through March 3, 1911. He explained that America administered the Philippines, which was stated in the Constitution. He also declared in his speech how America develops its self-government and internal development in its first 200 years. He discusses liberty or freedom, the effect of leading people or places and sovereignty as well to his audience. This speech of Senator Beveridge makes a strong appeal to logos, in that he uses inductive and deductive reasoning. He utilizes rhetorical devices such as anaphora, connotation, pathos, dialect and simile to clearly deliver the message that the …show more content…
First of all, Senator Beveridge takes the stand that Philippines is one of the America’s territory. He also mentions the performance of America in its first century and its up-and-comer status. He persuaded the audience regarding liberty, its definition and how the government needs it. He said that Filipinos were not able to handle the responsibility of leading their own country because God chose the American people to do it. Since Senator Beveridge had been given an opportunity to be one of the rulers of a country, he values this very much. With that being said, Senator Beveridge was a type of a government official who favors imperialism, but values his bread and butter really well. “He Knows which side his bread is buttered on (american idiom) meaning that Beveridge himself profits from the colonization of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Teddy Roosevelt and William Mckinley were supporters of the idea that the U.S had no choice but to annex the Philippines. In Albert J. Beveridge, “The March of the Flag” campaign speech comments that if we did not take over the Philippines, Germany, England, and Japan would have consumed them for themselves (paragraph 3). Religious reasons also played a role in validating the annexation. For instance, GOD said so (“manifest destiny”). On the contrary, the Filipinos were already a Christian group of people.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1898 there was a war with Spain which was because of how they treated the Cuban’s by the Spanish masters. The United States luckily had a lot of power around the whole world. The Filipino insurgents have always tried to attack the Spanish to have independence for many years which they wouldn’t receive it. They believed that the Americans might free them from the Spanish. Since America won the war they had three choices they had to make which was to give the Philippines independence, give the islands back to Spain, or annex the Philippines.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political leaders such as President William McKinley made accusations that after they "prayed to Almighty God for light and guidance (Doc 3)" it was revealed that the U.S must annex the Philippines in order to "educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them...by God's grace (Doc 3). " Politicians, in need to unify American…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anglo-Saxonism DBQ

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beveridge uses the perspective of sociology to support the annexation of the Philippines during a campaign speech he says, “We govern our children without their consent…. Would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, human, civilizing government of this republic to the savage, bloody (Spanish) rule”. (Doc B) this just goes to show how the Americans thought of the Filipinas, Beveridge compares them to the children of our nation in the way that they cannot take care of themselves that is why adults take care of them. Beverridges argument supporting the annexation of the Philippines was the right thing to do because during this stretch of time he, and many others believed that non white people where inferior to all whites and that we needed to step in and take care of them like our own…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states the the United States does not wish to take over foreign countries, but to simply lend a helping hand where is needed. Upon a country becoming uncivilized, America will interfere until all disputes are settled and the country can maintain itself without our assistance, also known as “police power (Document F).” The sole purpose of the help given by the United States is to ensure that foreign countries remain stable and prosperous to avoid abuse of the people and catastrophe. On the other hand, not everyone sought it fit for America to be putting so much attention on foreign affairs. These people were known as the Anti-imperialists.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He sought to justify this verdict by arguing that the Filipinos were uneducated and uncivil, and that it was America’s right and duty to “Christianise” them (Document 3). McKinley proclaimed this to a church delegation, probably occupied by a majority of white Anglo-Saxon protestant men and women, as they are most likely to support his motivation and Christian initiative (Intended Audience, Document 3). This showed the heavy emphasis American’s national identity at that time placed on Christianity. Future President Theodore Roosevelt also upheld the decision to annex the Philippines, using the reasoning that if America were not to take up leadership after Spanish rule, their government would descend into anarchy (Document 5). As well as being a strong appeal to the American ideal of democracy, the language he uses in the speech that proclaims these ideals reinforces what would later be known as his “speak softly and carry a big stick” attitude towards foreign policy.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Imperialism Dbq

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In a speech in early 1899, when debate was raging over what the United States should do with the Philippines, Congressman George Hoar made the argument that the constitution does not give the United States the right to rule people in order to “civilize them,” and doing this against that people’s own interests went against the text and the spirit of the document, and the founding principles of the United States. Hoar also argued against the claim that holding on to the Philippines was for the Filipinos’ benefit: The people there have got a government, with courts and judges, better than those of the people of Cuba, who, it was said, had a right to self-government, collecting their customs; and it is proposed to turn your guns on them, and say, “We think that our notion of government is better than the notion you have got…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism Dbq

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1890s and early 1900s, America, which had previously kept to itself, began expanding and attempting to take over smaller nations such as Hawaii, Panama, Cuba, and the Philippines. Many people supported this practice of imperialism, however, many also disagreed with it. The United States should have remained isolationist because it had internal issues to fix and imperializing contradicted democratic values. The first reason that America should not have sought to gain control of colonies is that it had its own problems to worry about.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advantages Of Overseas Expansion

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Some argued the moral position of this situation. They thought it was wrong to subjugate other nations for America’s welfare; and they were willing to apply the human rights to the people in the foreign lands. Others criticized the act of hypocrisy America was in. The United States knew what it was to fight for the liberation of its people, but still it wanted to do the same thing to less-develop countries. The anti-expansionists saw the contradiction of America’s actions.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the document, Imperialism: A Study, which was written by John A. Hobson, he opposes imperialism because he believes that it is immoral; he argues that it was not encouraged by everyone in a nation as it only provided benefits to certain people. Another person who opposed imperialism was Anna Manning Comfort who is the author of Home Burdens of Uncle Sam, in which she talks about how the United States shouldn’t interfere with other countries as there are already many things going on within its own territory. However on the opposite side Rudyard Kipling, who is the author of White Man’s Burden, argues in favor of imperialism as he encourages the United States to take up the “burden”. Lastly, Jules Ferry was the French Minister who wrote Speech…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jim Crow Imperialism

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Part One-Jim Crow The Jim Crow system was a post-Reconstruction series of legislation that established legally authorized racial segregation of the African American population of the south. The Jim Crow system ended in the 1950s with the beginning of the civil rights movement. As Hewitt and Lawson wrote, “these new statutes denied African Americans equal access to public facilities and ensured that blacks lived apart from whites.” With the 1896 Supreme Court ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson the court upheld the legality of the Jim Crow legislation.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The imperialized countries economies, such as Cuba, Philippines, and Hawaii have had a dramatic increases in income, profits, and trade; but, it was also beneficial for the U.S. because of the increase in profits, land, and military superiority. As shown in Document E, it is a picture of congressman T. Reed which past the spending bill, which the native is not happy of. Even though the native is not happy this bill was necessary to turn the Philippines into a thriving country with great economy. Plus, this was good for the U.S because it helped them have more control over the Philippines. Imperialism was a good policy for the U.S. at the turn of the 20th century because it improved their own economy, while they were strengthening the imperialized nations economy as well which gave them even more dominance and control of other countries in the world.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League”, got published by Carl Schurz in 1899 and it appeared to be a political opinion piece. The purpose of publishing this article this may have been to influence people who supported the idea of imperialism. Schurz claimed that imperialism held a lack of compatibility with the values that the American government claimed they stood for. Hence, when the United States seized control of the Philippines by force, Schurz felt compelled to write this article. The Philippines had been under a self-government and the Unites States only took control of the Philippines as a response to their rift with Spain.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism is not a good policy for the United States as it discredited our reputation as an advocate for democracy. In Mark Twain 's essay ‘To the Person Sitting in the Darkness’ he talks about how our actions in Cuba were “honorable and righteous.” But yet our actions in the Philippines had affected our reputation as a proponent for democracy. The United States actions in Cuba were honorable as we were advocating for democracy we wanted to help the unstable country prosper, while as the United States actions in the Philippines were not honorable as it was barbaric, savage-like and brutal. What is going unsaid in this essay by Mark Twain is why are we going against our ideals, are we not proponents for democracy?…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to make his argument resonate with the readers, his choice of persuasive writing tactics such as comparison, amplifications, personifications, and allusions, does the trick. Without these persuasive tactics, the connection he has made between the readers and his writing would be lost. The connections…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays