Triple E Senate Case Study

Brilliant Essays
Register to read the introduction… The “Triple E Senate” model will be proposed as a viable tool for Senate reform, stressing the importance of an elective, effective, and equal Senate. The history of the Senate will first be analysed to demonstrate the superfluous nature of the chamber in a twentieth-century democracy. The following paragraph will then examine the Senator appointment process, arguing in the defence of an elected senate. Following that, the effectiveness of the Senate will be criticized proving a lack of accountability within the system. To finalize argumentation, an equal Senate will be pushed for so that regions of Canada don’t face alienation from federal government …show more content…
Mohan

2035 Words
Works Cited

i. Albinski, Henry S. "The Canadian Senate: Politics and The Constitution." The American Political Science Review 57 (1973): 378-91. ii. Cody, Howard. "Australia's Senate and Senate Reform in Canada." (2006): 98-109. iii. Docherty, David C. "The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sboer Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About?" The Journal of Legaslative Studies 8 (2002): 27-48. iv. Hillis, Brandon. "An Elected Senate, Regional Representation, and the "Friendly Dictatorship"" Canadian Student Review (2007): 11-13. v. McCormick, Peter. "Could we, Should we, Reform the Senate and the Supreme Court?" Policy Options (2000): 6-11.

-----------------------
[1] Brandon Hillis, “An Elected Senate, Regional Representation, and the Friendly Dictatorship,” Canadian Student Review, (2007): 12.

[2] David C. Docherty, “The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About?,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, (2002): 27.

[3] Brandon Hillis, “An Elected Senate, Regional Representation, and the Friendly Dictatorship,” Canadian Student Review, (2007):

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The failures of Meech Lake have had vast impacts on conduct of current day politics, as well as describe the interprovincial relationships in Canada. Throughout this paper I will argue that demand for the Distinct Society clause by Quebec had an exclusionary impact on Canada’s aboriginal population due to a lack of consultation which together resulted in the failure of the Meech Lake Accord. The five main modification demanded of the accord for the Constitution by Quebec are the following: a recognition of the province of Quebec as a ‘distinct society”; a commitment to Canada’s bilingualism; increased provincial powers with respect to immigration; expansion of the…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper serves to propose three potential amendment solutions to the constitutional problem of Quebec; these include the prospective bilateral constitutional amendment, … as well as simply rethinking the…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Patronage has been an essential desideratum in the development of Canada’s political system. The evolution of responsible government in British North America is synonymous with the wresting of right to dispense patronage from the unelected governors and nobles to the elected office-bearers. (Simpson, 1988. p. 25).Given Canada’s remote distances, patronage has been instrumental in the integration among its vast geographic parts, far flung parts of the federal governments, and among sections of the state such as, women, new migrants, natives, and various ethnic and religious groups.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each category has a defined job; they work within the conjunction within the legislative process. The working system of the Canadian parliament is greatly influenced by the United Kingdom. It is the indistinguishable replica of the parliament at the Westminster (Andeweg, 2000). The differences are stemmed from the exclusive situations of Canada, which include the temporary nature of the residency of the monarch in the country and the need of the title in order to develop the upper chamber.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my empathetic response I have written from the perspective of a Roman senator who lived and served during the reign of the emperor Tiberius. The response is intended to have been an extract from the autobiography of my senator, as an impression of Tiberius from contemporary sources, though coloured by the influence of more modern findings. The identity of my senator is important in understanding his stance on the attitudes concerning Tiberius held by the general public, and to this end I have decided to present him under the name of (insert name here ). This choice reflects his obviously patrician status, with his personal name being accompanied by the name of his voting “tribe” and the familial cognomen (Bradley 1990, ).…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aucoin, P. (2012). New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk. Governance, 177-199. This article analyzes the increasing political pressures in four parliamentary systems, which include Australia, Britain, Canada and New Zealand. It looks at pressures from mass media, transparency in the government, more in depth audits, increased political competition and political restrictions in the electorate.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebick (2001) states that plurality system allows parties not chosen by the majority of Canadians to take power and dominate the parliament. The author argues that in 1988, the federal elections were based on the debate about the free trade agreement with the United States. While more than 60 percent of Canadians voted against the tories (the only political party that supported the agreement), the tories won with the majority of the seats in the parliament and passed the project of the free trade. McDonald (2013) also states that the current electoral system renforces the feeling of unrepresentation in the political system because, at that time, the tories government won the election with less than 40 percent of the votes but ruled the country as it it won 90 percent of them. McDonald (2013) calls for the adoption of the proportional represeantation system will improve the citizens’ satisfaction and their participation in the elections.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss the issue of entrenching a charter by how it violates the principles of democracy. I would like to state that sections one and thirty-three are not sufficient enough to overcome this objection. More specifically, the discussion of my argument will mainly focus on how section one guarantees those rights; however there are reasonable limits in which we citizens cannot overpass. I will also focus my argument on how section thirty-three allows governments and legislatures to overtake the rights and freedoms that are prescribed by the charter. Indeed, Canadian citizens are protected by their rights and they live in a democratic society where they are encouraged to express their needs.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many Canadians think that the Senate should be kept whereas some think that it should be abolished. In my opinion, the Senate should be abolished because it deducts money from hardworking Canadians for doing almost nothing. The money that is wasted on the Senate can be used for something more important. The people that work there could work somewhere else where they will have a more useful contribution, such as organizations related to health care and education. There are many negative affects that the Senate has on the Canadian government , which wouldn't be an issue if the Senate wasn't…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    "The right to vote is one of the great privileges of a democratic society, for after all it is you the people, who determine into whose hands the guidance of public affairs may be entrusted," said John G. Diefenbaker in June 1962. The people whom make the decisions in Canada, are voted in by the citizens. This paper will examine why voting rights is a big reason why Canada is the amazing country it is today. Some defining voting rights in Canadian history were when women, people of different ethnicities, and people of different religions were granted the right to vote. They are big parts of the history that makes Canada who we are today.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Senate serves no purpose/is outdated/no longer necessary” (Kennedy, 2015). This was the number one answer in a recent poll taken by Harris/Decima on how the general populace feels about the Senate. A component of parliament which has a constitutional responsibility to ensure the passing of proper, fair, and good legislature has for some time now not received shouts of applause but rather cries for reform. To tackle this issue, this paper will explain the origin and critically assess the lack of responsibility in the functioning of this institution, while suggesting reforms that will restore Senatorial responsibility, and how they could impact the functioning of other institutions and their possible consequences. To restore this sense of…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze and assess the arguments and normative framework posited by White in his article “The ‘Centre’ of the Democratic Deficit: Power and Influence in Canadian Political Executives”. Furthermore, the reformative solutions put forth by White will be examined and weighed to determine their viability. White’s argument is that there is no means of identifying the democratic deficit produced by the centralization of power within the top tiers of the executive branch of Canadian government. In order to evaluate White’s argument, it important to understand the definitions central to his argument. White sets out specific terminology to define issues within a democratic framework.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It does not matter what country we live; we always concern about how much power the president and the government are holding, especially in some democracy countries, such as the United States of America. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter one Separation of Powers, is American current system of government is inefficient, unaccountable, and unresponsive, and he suggests that a Parliamentary system is adopted in order to solve Pandora’s Box as government and achieve new program, which is to help the majority to achieve what they need. Does Parliamentary system function well on American government system? In my opinion, Parliamentary system is still developing. It is a good system, but it is not exactly solving most political issues in America.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays