Self-Sacrifice In Silence Within The Mission

Great Essays
The concept of self-sacrifice elicits thoughts associated with characteristics such as selflessness, courage, and utilitarianism. In a world that is black and white, free of complexity, self-sacrifice appears to be less of a challenge than in a world where the action of sacrifice may, in turn, bring upon greater conflict. Within the films Silence directed by Martin Scorsese and The Mission directed by Roland Joffe, characters must use philosophical reasoning through a consequential and deontological framework to question the intent and worth of self-sacrifice while also grappling with the ramifications of their actions within society.
Despite the plot being set in the jungles of South America and taking place a century later, The Mission bears many similarities with events in
…show more content…
Near the end of the movie are the most substantial scenes that depict the philosophical influences of the decisions of the Jesuits. The Spanish and Portuguese wanted to control the land of the Guarani and thus unleashed their military might on them. Acting from a deontological standpoint, Father Gabriel led a mass procession that involved many Guarani adults and children to march into the oncoming hail of bullets from the European powers. As a deeply devout Jesuit, Gabriel opposed all forms of violence and instead turned to the callings of his faith. He sacrifices himself, although, in the process, many others are killed. Mendoza and Fielding, operated under a consequential mindset. They want to save the Guarani from the assault of the Portuguese and Spanish and so they believe their fighting will result in a better chance for the Guarani to keep their land. Technically the actions of Fielding and Mendoza are not consequential, the Guarani are still slaughtered and their fighting did not benefit them, but their intentions do fall under the same

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers have developed concepts they consider are sufficient for defining racism. One philosopher is Tommie Shelby. Shelby presents his reasoning for why we should view racism as an ideology, or a system of beliefs that constitute social oppression. Shelby opposes Garcia who accepts that beliefs do not contribute to racism because one should be able to explain one’s beliefs; in some cases, the subjects cannot. This means that racial discrimination is not just about the individual but also society.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Enraged, he started to shoot wildly, killing two young boys, then left” (The Japanese Military). These soldiers could not be thinking straight or they knew exactly what they were doing. The innocent people of Nanking did not deserve this just because their rulers were fighting. When other races need help and “if the U.S. has the ability to prevent the systematic killing of an innocent group of civilians who are being systematically ‘cleansed’ due to their ethnicity, religion, etc., we have a moral obligation to do so” (Should the U.S.). Being able to do something to help gives people a chance of freedom instead of watching innocent people die is a resposibily.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the end, as in most Shakespearean tragedies, the death toll is immense and the conspiracy ultimately failed. The conspiracy responsible for the demise of Julius Caesar, did not succeed in their hunger for power; however, the small league did in fact kill Caesar, but endangered themselves in the action, leading to failure for all involved. Conspiracies with the intentions of killing a public leader should be confidential, yet when Cassius prompts an oath, Brutus refuses. The plot being all but spoiled, when Popilius bids them luck in the engagement, it is known that their affair is not…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    European expansion led colonists to the search for gold and the motivation to escape religious persecution. Colonists staged multiple ambushes on Native American tribes which caused tension to rise between the two groups. Wars broke out which fueled the death toll to raise and more diseases to be contradicted due to resources being minimal. The death of Native Americans did not weigh heavily on the conscience of colonists because town officials taught them that the Natives were just “a rude, barbarous, and naked people”. Officials of the Virginia Company of London believed that the Native people should be “ [killed] all at once; but civilizing them is slow and will take much more effort.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He even believes that it was his own fault that they were killed, and rightly so, because his fleeing the country to go against Macbeth was what led Macbeth to suspect Macduff and murder his family in the first place. Realizing one’s fatal flaw is also necessary to a tragic hero, and this shows that Macduff has hamartia. Despite having a flaw, it doesn’t make sympathizing with Macduff easier; on the contrary, this so-called “flaw” distances him even further from the audience, as this incredible devotion for one’s country is too alien for most people to…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This killing brought an uproar from the citizens backing Okonkwo and what he stands for, but they do nothing to stop the other four kotma from escaping. “He knew that Umuofia would not go to war. He knew because they had let the other messengers escape.” The whole act of arranging a village meeting, discussing and coming to terms with the plan of war, and then having it all distinguish by a single messenger commanding against it shows the true defeat of a nation through…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tecumseh wants peace and freedom, but “where the white people are, there is no peace for them” (Tecumseh 233). His fight for peace is also one for equality with the white man so that his people will not be viewed as savages, but as an independent nation who has a right to own and live on the land of their ancestors. Using violence against those hurting innocent people and children is acceptable for a hero, but it must be humane. When he was young, Tecumseh witnessed cruelty from both whites and natives. He once observed a white man being burned at the stake and was so horrified that he severely rebuked his fellow Indians.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Without legitimacy, insurgent groups fizzle and die out. Because of this, it is critical that no fuel be added to the flame. Murphy knows that by killing these goat herders, he not only creates a reason for more people to join the Taliban, but he also commits a war crime that would put him and his team in prison for years. No one disagrees that murderers like Ahmad Shah should be taken out, but the ends do not always justify the means. Thus, Murphy decides to let them…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, problems with selfishness and its link with morality in the first contemporary theory, mutual-advantage contractualism, led to a second contemporary theory, reasonable-agreement contractualism. The second version has been shown to have problems, especially with the rights of the weak. Despite these issues, both versions of contractualism still have followers today. It is because of this that a comparison of the two is imperative to the task of understanding whether contractualism has any merit. This essay has discussed the advantages and disadvantages of both theories – where it was shown that mutual-advantage contractualism has a more detrimental disadvantage, that morality should be self serving.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From many instances in the movie, we could see that the Jesuits indeed established a good relationship with the indians because their mission had both the Jesuits and the Gurani living in peace. In contrary, the Portuguese wanted to commit genocide by enslaving the indians, and in the process take their land and identity. The Jesuits response to this, try to oppose the Portuguese to the best of their ability and the movie ends with the Jesuits dying while fighting the Portuguese to defend their new friends, the indians. In fact, this bond between the Indians and the Jesuits really confirmed that there was no way the Jesuits could be considered to have committed cultural genocide. A scene that really shows this was the one where the Guarani leader forgives Captain Rodrigo Mendoza, the former indian slave trader.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays