Self-Interest In Naked Economics

Improved Essays
In Naked Economics, on page 44, the “prisoner’s dilemma” illustrates the idea of self-interest sometimes leads to very poor outcomes. Two people are arrested on the suspicion of murder. They are separated so they can be interrogated without communication. The case isn’t strong, but the police want a confession. If neither confesses, they both receive a 5-year sentence. If they both confess they both receive a 25-year sentence. Lastly, if one rats the other out, then the rat gets a 3-year sentence and the other gets a life sentence. Both people are best off collectively keeping their mouth shut. Neither of them decides to keep their mouths shut and begin to think. Prisoner A figure that if his partner keeps his mouth shut, then he can rat and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Naked Economics Quiz

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. 1.Specialization is very important it allows the workers to have an advantage and focus on where they are good. 2.workers who specialize are more likely to price more at a faster pace in a good quality. Allow economic agents to take advantage of economies of scales. 2.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the stories of “The Devil and Tom Walker”, “The Black Cat”, and “Fences”, this remains true. Humans find themselves often caught in situations where they must choose between being honest or selfish. Many times people want more and more, regardless of the fact they might already have just enough. Whether it’s power, money, or love, people constantly want it all. The importance is understanding that when it comes to greed, it is easy to fall deep into the gallows of…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Greed

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction.” Greed is society's worst enemy. We need to be more thankful for what we have, but today in society commercialism and advertising makes it harder than ever to avoid the bottomless pit. We need to try extremely hard not to want what we can’t have. As humans, we thrive on the idea of what could be, not what is.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freakonomics is a book about the exploration of prominent issues in society and going against the conventional thinking in regards to these issues. The book declares connections between two topics that are normally not related to each other. For example, comparisons between sumo wrestlers and teachers are made that eventually connect back to economics, in this case incentives. Questions that are usually not asked are examined in the book using evidence; the questions talk about issues seemingly unimportant to the average person, like drug dealers living with their parents. Also, it uses substantial data to proclaim common knowledge as untruthful, like whether nurturing significantly helps a child or not.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being put in a situation that has a negative outcome no matter what an individual does can be relatively difficult. The reason for this is because that person will typically have to make an important and tough decision. The way one decides what to do demonstrates his or her personality and character. If the decision the person makes benefits themself, but negatively impacts the other person, it can be assumed that they’re uncivil and essentially self-centered. However, if the individual makes the choice that would benefit another person but doesn’t benefit themself, it can be concluded that they are caring and altruistic.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Its harder to decide because they don't know what the other is thinking because they are in separate rooms. So they go with not the best idea for the both of them but the best idea for themselves. Which reduces the cost which is jail time and increases the benefits which is no jail time at all. In the past scenario the prisoners believed that their best choice was to rat on the other and hope that the other person would clam up.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Human Morality articles, we closely study the themes of support and survival. One of the articles mentions how being a good Samaritan comes second to keeping your own self safe, citing the Princess Diana incident in France. This further proves the point that feasibility must come before the intention of benefitting others, as it must be viable for one (in this case the United States Federal Government),…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fracking Dilemma

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The prisoner’s dilemma reminds me the fracking dilemma. I will be using the fracking dilemma to present my argument and example. Natural gas from shale has been a very active subject in the western region. Many residents are complaining that the fracking can affect the underground water and cause earthquakes. The energy companies and government agencies are giving the people an option to have either cheaper gas or clean water.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nalisha Baldeo Paper #3 The Virtue of Selfishness Ayn Rand thought that there was something wrong with how American/Western culture and its moral thinking was using the term “selfish” and maybe it need some re-evaluation. According to Rand selfishness is that each individual man should be the only intended beneficiary of his own thought and action.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If neither confesses, each prisoner will be sent to prison for one year. If one confesses and the other stays silent, the prisoner who confessed is set free and the other is sent to jail for three years. If both confess, then they are both sent to prison for two years. The dilemma in this situation is that from either perspective it is always advantageous to confess to the crime. However, if both prisoners confess, they are serving the greatest possible number of years in prison.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public goods are benefits that the government provides for everyone. Examples of public goods include National Security, Rule of Law, street lamps, and roads. Collective action refers to action taken by people with shared interests assembled into groups, called factions, to achieve a common objective, e.g. to encourage a new ideal for their community. It is often difficult to organize collective action to achieve public goods because people are self­interested.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When I decided to attend college three and a half hours away from home, one of the hardest decisions my mom and I had to make was about how I would go back home for visits. We found ourselves in a prisoner’s dilemma when my brother brought up the idea of my mom buying me a car for college. In a prisoner’s dilemma, both parties have incentives to defect, or not to cooperate. In this case, my mom had incentives to defect from buying me a car and I had an incentive to defect from driving home all the time. Before reaching a mutual decision, my brother had asked my mom if she was willing to buy me a car and told her he would then ask me separately if I was willing to drive.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the critique “Egoism and Altruism,” Louis P. Pojman strongly rejects the idea of Ayn Rand that everyone should have and egoist morality by explaining the “false dilemma” created between egoism and altruism. He explains that her idea of egoism stating that she believes “selfishness is a virtue and altruism is a vice.” He argues that while some egoist traits are morally necessary, such as self-love and self-interest, they should not be brought about or acted upon at the cost of someone else’s happiness. The idea that one ought to “love thy neighbor as yourself” means to treat everyone with the same respect and dignity that you treat yourself with, not to harm a stranger for your own happiness or joy. He argues against Rand’s theory by stating…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When faced with a choice, one must contend with their moral compass. The people one loves could be harmed if the person only cares about his or her own wants. Although sometimes one makes decisions for their family for their own good, taking it too far can end up with someone being killed. This is shown in the short story Button, Button through the conflict devices man vs. man, man vs. self, and man vs. technology. A person being selfish hurts the people they love.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays