Web. 14 Feb. 2017 Yang, Geoff. “The Case For Censorship In The New Social Age.” TechCrunch.…
The informative article titled “Blogs and Democratization” by John Vivian discussed blogs and how they have influenced mainstream media and gave a sense of credibility to blogs and the people the that read them. The first topic would be blogs gave people the power to influence decisions of political figures or to even ruin their reputation. Josh Marshall, looked into a speech gave by trent Lott at a segragationalist’s 100th birthday party. To him he was just being nice to the 100th year old, but to other viewers he was supporting the politicians views. Marshall took to his blog and an uproar ensued, four days Lott publicly apologized and about a week later the senate voted him out.…
In this story, “Blogs and Democratization”, by John Vivian believe it's a relation between blogs and democratizing. Blogs democratize mass communication with easy access for people, but nobody is monitoring the activities. The U.S Senate, Trent Lott was fired because Joshua Marshall thought Lott’s speech was racist. Marshall put a blog on his website and talked about him everyday. Other people began to join in and a few days later; the story was on the news then Lott was voted out.…
The authorities delete my sentences. When they find that I’m writing too much, they shut off my IP” (Ai Weiwei, " Ai Weiwei on Censorship in China-Creative Time…
Another feature of Qianlong Emperor’s governance was not only to ban books and burn them, but also to persecute and attack any pro-Manchu citizens that may oppose his point of view. This is part of the “literary inquisition” of literary censorship that intimated, beheaded, or imprisoned any opponents to Qianlong Emperor policies regarding Ming Dynasty literature. In this capacity, individuals that were perceived to be an enemy of Qing Dynasty literature became a target for government officials that sought to enforce Qianlong Emperor’s policies through trials and court hearings on literary ideology: Despite these displays of Chinese virtues, the Qianlong Emperor was not fully confident that the Chinese supported his rule, and he was quick to act on any…
A complicated word isn't it, ‘censorship’. It comes from the Latin word ‘censere’ which means to give as one's opinion, something nonexistent in an Anthem society. Like many things, a world without censorship can be scary, but a world with too much of it, is a world with no meaning. Look at Anthem, the people who live in that society have no meaning, no life, no importance. Although many people can't imagine comparing the United States to an Anthem society, I believe the United States is an Anthem society because America has huge amounts of censorship when it comes to the press.…
A new age of public expression has emerged with the invention of social media and web blogs. This transformation of the manner in which people are able to openly speak with others across the world either publically or privately. Allowing individuals to give their perspective on certain issues occurring in the world are important to educated the public with a different perception. Positive change for the future of the world occurs through discussion, even online. However, there is a downside to allowing people to write and publish anything they want online or in newspapers.…
Book banning, censorships, and challenges have been a significant issue in the United States since the early 19th century. A book challenge is an attempt to have printed work be removed or restrained by the objections of a group or person. Whereas a book ban is an actual removal of the written work from a curriculum, or library (Edwards 2). The practice of book banning is a kind of censorship that restricts and prohibits the mass by law to have any access to banned materials. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech during this period of time to all citizens, residents, and populations that live in the Unites States of America.…
Censorship has long been a part of American culture, shaping the overall morals of the people. This is a point made in the excerpt from The Atlantic Monthly as the writer states that some will disagree with something being allowed to be shown in front of children while others believe it should be allowed. This issue is still present to this day and many people maintain very ambiguous opinions on the topic. These ambiguous opinions are capitalized on in the article as being between moralists and artists; those who believe these artworks being shown is evil and then those who only see the beauty in the works. The writer sums this up well, claiming that “Moralists will justify it for one set of reasons; artists will acede to it for another.”.…
Self-censorship is the act of editing and suppressing one’s beliefs or creations in any sort of medium as a response to a real or perceived fear. This phenomenon is globally prevalent, making it critical to investigate the implications of a variety of aspects that shape a country, including its predominant religion, political regime, and social norms to determine how each affects the existence and magnitude of self-censorship. My analysis on self-censorship in this essay will be in the context of the artistic works produced by both “western” countries including Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and “eastern” countries such as Turkey, Morocco, Singapore, and China. One significant complication that arises when analyzing self-censorship…
Sound of Silence Censorship in the most unlikely of places, where the freedom of expression is guaranteed in our inalienable and Consultation rights. Censorship is still able to shine through the cracks of democracy. The topic of censorship can be seen as a necessary precaution from the immoralities of life while others see the government as exceedingly dominating in its attempt to establish judgement upon what is right or acceptable for society. While censorship is often seen as an action relative for the greater good, throughout history, it has actually been one of the fundamental tools by which governments have maintained their control. While many would think new rising technology would further eliminate the constraints of censorship Philip…
This is the question Bryan Thompson author of “Free Speech vs. Censorship: You decide” (Recorder 1994) is asking. Thompson examines the ever changing levels of censorship from one generation to the next. One could argue that censorship usually occurs during a time in which the nation has experienced the most rapid and dislocating changes. When this takes place not only does censorship contradict the tradition of free speech, it also gets in the way of understanding the process in which our society is changing. We are an insecure nation, with a cultural identity problem.…
Censorship in today’s society can limit everything we say or do in our everyday lives. One of our rights in the First Amendment is the freedom of speech. There are famous court cases that have made it to the supreme court about what has been done and said in certain places. The First Amendment can also be censored in almost all of its components. Censorship in today’s society has many good factors and also many bad factors that can limit what information people are provided.…
Ever since people have communicated, people have wanted to encourage some ideas, while suppressing others. This idea eventually became known as censorship, and was applied by groups of even minimal power all over the world. The merit of censorship has been argued from many different sides, for many different reasons. Much of what censorship is, in our modern world, is a strong group of people depriving others of knowledge, to further the first group 's goals. Although some censorship may be beneficial when it comes to taking maturity into consideration, it is a dangerous thing to contemplate.…
Political Correctness is against the notion of free speech, whether it be in video games, movies and television, clothing, even the language you use even disagreeing with them. By the very nature of PC it is self-censorship that in itself should be self-evident, although that’s not the issue at hand. People have the right to self-censor by their own will, but when they are extending this to others, that when the problem occurs. Twitter has recently appoint a council to “ensure that people feel safe expressing themselves on twitter”, but although this may seem to be for a good cause, the context of this situation is terrible (cartes, par. 3).…