Many people are debating on the idea of censorship on the internet. I think the best way to handle this argument would be to use selective censorship. This would allow children’s parents to determine what the children can look at based on their maturity or how responsible they are. This would prevent many children from looking up or being on what they are not supposed to be, and this option gives the parents more control over their kids. But when the kids get mature or responsible the parents can allow their children more freedom on the internet.
Having selective censorship can teach responsibility and maturity. If a child has privileges to do whatever he wants to on the internet and is caught doing something he's …show more content…
With this option of selective censorship parents can individually select websites and games that their kids can look at and play on. And as your children become more responsible or mature you can allow them to play on or look at more websites and gradually increase their privileges on the internet. If you do not have the selective censorship, children are free to look at whatever they and kids do not always make the best decisions. And like I said, with it you can limit your children to what you want them to look at.
During school hours many classrooms have adopted the way of using technology on an everyday basis. With anywhere from twenty to thirty students in a classroom there is no way for the teacher to see what every single kid is doing at once. Without the censorship teachers are constantly having to walk around the classroom and look at what each individual student is looking at. With selective censorship the teacher can select what he or she knows they are going to using in class that day. This way the teachers know that the students are on one of the websites that he or she