Selectcare Case Summary

Improved Essays
This category of claims involves the hospitals obtaining authorization for one procedure at a higher level of care, but then billing for a lower level of care. SelectCare denied the claims for a purported lack of authorization. However, in these claims, the procedure performed was substantially similar to the procedure that was authorized. Accordingly, no good faith basis existed for SelectCare to have denied the medically necessary services that were provided to its members.

Section 13.5 of the Agreement requires the parties to meet and confer in goof faith to resolve disputes arising under the Agreement. I therefore request that SelectCare contact me within thirty (30) days of its receipt of this letter to schedule a conference to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ronald Vaden V

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue Presented by the Case The first issue presented in this case refers to the allegation of the breach of contract for insurance coverage provided by Steven Lucas. The second issue presented in the case is whether or not Steven Lucas is responsible for providing false information to potential clients. The third issue presented in this case refers to the accountability of Nunn and Vaden examining the policy and what the insurance program entails. Plaintiff…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 2 Assignment

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Payment was denied because the documentation did not support the medical necessity for the injection procedure. The documentation did not support the trigger points as reasonable and necessary. There was no indication of symptoms or physical findings that would support the medical necessity of the service at the level billed, in accordance with Medicare Guidelines. For the procedure code 20553 to be considered medically necessary and reasonable, an appropriate payable diagnosis needs to be billed as outlined in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) (L30155).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subject: Barnes v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center Inc. Court: In the Court of Special Appeals Justice: Woodward, Zarnoch, Kenny, James A., III Appellee/Cross-Appellant: Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Inc. Appellants/Cross-Appellees: David A Barnes & Laura A. Barnes Court the Case was appealed from: The Circuit Court for Baltimore County Facts: Mr. David Barnes went to see Dr. Allen Halle his Primary Care Physician Care Physician, on January 25 because he having weakness in his right hand grip, numbness, and tingling in his right arm. Dr. Halle advised Mr. Barnes to go the Emergency Room immediately because he was afraid that Mr. Barnes may have been having a transient ischemic attack (mini-stroke). Dr. Halle than called Mrs.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Insurance company reimbursement rates are seldom available to the public. Most patients are privy to these reimbursement rates only after their claim is processed. After reviewing the charge rates and reimbursement rates of Sutter Health, a system of not-for-profit hospitals and physician groups, disparities between hospital charges and disparities between insurance reimbursements were identified. The results revealed that a hospital charges different rates for the same procedures.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main issue for this case is whether or not Dr. Baugh and Dr. Feldman’s noncompete agreements with Colombia Heart were in fact enforceable. Originally, on the trial court level, they agreed with the doctors in their suit against Colombia Heart, stating that the noncompete provision was unenforceable, and their actions were admissable. Colombia Heart brought it up on appeals. The case was ultimately reversed in their favor, as on appeal they disagreed and found that the noncompete agreements were actually enforceable, and that the doctors were in the wrong, and that they were not able to go and practice on their own due to the agreements they had as shareholders. I find this to be really interesting actually.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The highlighted language is a broad and material exception to the operation of Section 2.6. SelectCare is prohibited from denying a medically necessary claim under circumstances where good cause existed for the lack of prior authorization. This exception prevents SelectCare from unreasonably shifting the costs of its member’s medically necessary services to the Hospitals when the Hospital is not at fault. As discussed more fully below, good cause existed for the lack of authorization on each of the claims at issue. Accordingly, SelectCare’s denial of these medically necessary claims was unreasonable and payment should be made to the Hospitals.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case of Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Sarah Bush Lincoln health center. This was a case where a patient Brenda Brandt was seen for a medical condition. While being treated for the condition the medical center she was implanted with a product that would be subsequently be recalled after her surgery. I was recall because it caused server medical complications with patients. Mrs. Brandt files a suit against the medical center and the manufacture Boston Scientific Corporation of the product which was implanted in her for a breach of warranty the Health center file a motion to have the case thrown out.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Restasis Case Studies

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A review of the records reveals the member to be an adult male with a birth date of 08/02/1950. The member has a diagnosis of bilateral keratoconjunctivitis sicca (also referred to as dry eye syndrome). The member’s treating provider, Lucian Szmyd, MD recommended treatment using the prescription medication, Restasis. The carrier has denied coverage of the prescription medication, Restasis as not medically necessary.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superintends Case Study

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rep. Perales meetings on Friday 2/17: Key points Greene County Superintends and Legislator Meeting: • Majority of superintends oppose new tests suggested in the new budget because: - In addition to the tests required by the federal and state regulations, schools have internal pre-requisite screening and tests for certain class. Students take up to 30 tests already. - Parents and students are tired and complaining about excessive testing - Tests are proven to be ineffective instead creativity, problem solving, and acquiring soft skills should be encouraged • Superintends find the top-down approach to education ineffective.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Example of an invalid claim is when a medical office list incorrect provider number of referring doctor. Dirty claim is a claim that has errors, because a medical office provides inaccurate revenue codes when filing a claim. Delete claim is a claim that is canceled or voided by Medicare fiscal intermediary an example of a delete claim is when a CMS 1500 02/12 claim is missing demographic information like a patient’s age or…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the surface, medical coding seems simple enough. Assign a specific code to a medical diagnosis, treatment, symptom, drug reaction, or procedure. But, when you start digging into the details of how medical coding works and what it can affect, the liability potential of applying the wrong medical codes becomes apparent. Mismatched Coding Can Lead to Insurance Fraud Claims…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medicare fraud occurs when healthcare providers bill the government for services or supplies that have not been provided. Such fraud is uncontrollable, costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars each year, according to some estimates. In the managed era, accusations of fraud and abuse sometimes involve what are called “kickbacks” or other types of financial arrangements that encourages to order tests, refer patients to favored laboratories or specialty services for financial and not medical reasons. These forms of fraud and abuse have caused the most definitional problems, because many of these relationships and practices are not considered fraud or abuse by those who engage in…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Necessity Analysis

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to discuss medical necessity in the current era of health information technology, we must have a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of medical necessity. Most of this article focuses on explaining medical necessity and towards the end includes some thoughts on how medical necessity relates with health information technology. The meaning of medical necessity is different for providers, physicians, courts, government/private insurers, or consumers. Medical necessity is used for managed care plans as a tool to deny or approve necessary care.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apparent authority is also called (“ostensible authority”) relates to the doctrine s of the law agency. Apparent agency is an agency, corporation or partnership which employs another person to do his or her work on person behalf and has the responsibility of the employer and act in person. Apparent authority is formed by contract between parties, but contract is not always necessary. According to Showalter describes apparent authority, as a members of the medical field who are not hospital employees, but they have contract with the hospital.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Vs Krizek Case Study

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The False Claims Act states that if an individual or group files a claim, which is knowingly falsified, then they are liable for the damages and the additional fines for the fraudulent claims. Analysis There were a few obvious mistakes that were made by both Dr. Krizek and Blanka Krizek throughout their Medicare and Medicaid claims process. Dr. Krizek administered treatments and procedures that were not medically necessarily. This was simply to gain more from the government when filing a claim. Dr. Krizek or other medical experts could have argued this.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays