Section 28a Of The Criminal Procedure Code

Decent Essays
Besides, Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution explains that:‘Where a person is arrested he shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of his arrest and shall be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice’.This clause shall be read together with sections 28 and 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code to the effect that firstly, a person who is arrested without a warrant shall be brought before a Magistrate for further instruction either to further detain the person or otherwise which shall not exceed 24 hours from the time of his arrest according to Section 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Secondly, an arrested person must be informed as soon as possible of the grounds of the arrest and has the right to consult and be defended by a lawyer of his choice according to Section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code. …show more content…
This means police does not empowered to arrest for the sole purpose of questioning or for evidence. The grounds must already exist at the time when the person was arrested. The ground to arrest the arrestee must be communicate such as quick and reasonable. However there are deprivation under authority of Emergency Laws such as Public Order of Prevention of Crime Ordinance 1969 requires the arresting officers reasons to believed the are grounds. It does not require the grounds to be informed to the arrested person. Meanwhile, the second limb is about the rights of arrestee to have legal councel. The right of legal representation have two stages which are after arrest and at trial or judicial proceedings. To show the breach of this article, detainee must show that the police has bad faith in terms of obstructed a detainee from exercising his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Article two gives the exceptions for an arrest without a search warrant. An officer can make an arrest without a warrant if a crime was committed by an offender in front of an officer. Additionally, an officer can make an arrest if the offender is trying to escape…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a stuffy overcrowded police station of the once quiet town of Littleton, Colorado. A place that was never host to any real commotion until the day of April 20,1999 where two shooters opened fire in the local high school. The press rushing Captain Stephens with questions of how Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold got their firearms. NBC News Reporter, to the captain: Captain Stephens! Captain!…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Style of Cause and Citation: R. v. Paterson,(2017) SCC 15 Court: “Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Court of Appeal of British Columbia (British Columbia’s Court of Appeal) Facts of the case: Following an agreement with the appellant to affect a “no case” seizure if he surrenders three marihuana roaches. The police make a warrantless search and entry by police into the home of the appellant. Once inside, the police found a bulletproof vest, a firearm and drugs (R. v. Paterson, (2017)). They arrested the appellant and then obtained a tele-warrant to search his apartment, which led to the discovery of other firearms and drugs.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summarize. Include background information and the court’s decision. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was accused of sexual assault against a woman in Phoenix. After interrogation and confessing to the crimes, Miranda was convicted for 20-30 years per count.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Consent to Search In R v. Wills (1992) the court found the following criteria necessary for a valid consent search: 1. There was consent, expressed or implied; 2. The giver of the consent had the authority to give the consent; 3. The consent was voluntary (not police coerced); 4. The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lawful arrest Lawful arrest does not require a search warrant when arresting someone. The officer can search the person and any area surrounding the person. The police search the surrounding are for evidence that could be throw or destroyed within the suspect wingspan. The lawful arrest is also helps when searching a vehicle, when the suspect is arrested. The Supreme Court can let a police officer search a vehicle if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the vehicle has weapons or drugs that belongs to the suspects.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment Essay

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment authorizes that warrants be given by neutral magistrates based on facts given under oath or affirmation. The Judge has to review the affidavits and decide whether the facts determine probable cause to issue the warrant. Also, the judge needs to know why the facts in the affidavit is trustworthy. Search warrants have to be established on hard facts. Locations that are searched must be described in a lot of detail so law enforcement will not needlessly invade privacy.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Probable Cause Exists

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After proving that probable cause exists the law enforcement officer must then wait to receive approval from the judge who then has to assess the existence of probable…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, this only applies when the suspect is in custody. According to GetLegal.com, if both elements are not present, the police are not required to give Miranda warnings. Many landmark cases have addressed and debated over what the true meaning of "custody" and "interrogation," however the main definition to go by is that custody means to be arrested. Therefore, the standard a court will apply is objective as they give a fair choice, where they will ask whether the average person is aware of the circumstances and of their rights but would have felt free to leave the scene and remain silent. If the answer is no, the suspect is put in…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental Illness In Jails

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In that case, with the obstacles the police faces when dealing with mental illness situations, there are two serious issues appears from the current state of criminalization with someone having a mental illness and injury or death as a result of their contact with the police. As noted, officers are in the position to be first responders to serious mental health emergencies; police intervention accounts for a significant amount of referrals into care estimates of 15-40% of the mentally disordered is currently in jails and prisons (Adelman, 2003). Majority of arrest of mentally ill people are for non-serious crimes such as minor theft, noise or disruptions complaints, failure to appear in court following other charges that was either directly or indirectly related to their illness. A study by Rogers, suggest that lack of advance knowledge of mental illness was a contributing factor to arrest (1990). As a result, an arrest was often the only step available for officers in situation where individuals were not sufficiently disturbed too be accepted by hospitals but were too public in their deviance to be ignored.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Officer discretion is the ability of officers to use logic and common sense. And, for those seeking assistance from the criminal justice system (CJS), mandatory arrest subordinates their rights and needs to that of the CJS. Advocates claim, with effectiveness that the criminal justice system has factual ignored the context, circumstances and various desires and needs of victims. Majority of states have accepted arrest policies that require police to either arrest one or both parties at the scene, or to just write a report justifying why an arrest is not made. Mandatory arrest policies are normally safer for the victim because if the abuser isn’t arrested, he or she will make the attack worse against the victim as a beating for contacting the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays