Section 203 Bcra

Improved Essays
According to section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), government law forbids enterprises and unions from utilizing their general treasury trusts to make autonomous uses for discourse that is an "electioneering correspondence" or for discourse that explicitly advocates the decision or thrashing of a candidate. “An electioneering communication is any broadcast, cable, or satellite communication” that refers to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office” and is made within 30 days of a primary election, and that is publicly distributed,”…” (The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. ). In January 2008, appellant (plaintiff) Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) …show more content…
Segments 201 and 311 require the revelation of givers to such correspondence, and a disclaimer when the correspondence is not approved by the applicant it plans on backing. Citizens United contended that, Section 203 abuses the First Amendment all over when connected to The Movie and its connected ads, and that Sections 201 and 203 are additionally unconstitutional when it’s addressing these …show more content…
The final decision was five votes for Citizens United and four votes against them. This five to four vote was bases among ideological lines, the majority held that under the First Amendment corporate subsidizing of autonomous political telecasts in applicant decisions can't be restricted (The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. ). John G. Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, and Samuel A. Alito, were the people who voted in favor of Citizens United, whereas Justice Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor voted against Citizens

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The US First Amendment protects much of media in what it can replicate in likeliness or sound. If the purpose is "informative or cultural" the use is immune; "if it serves no such function but merely exploits the individual portrayed, immunity will not be granted.” Felcher and Rubin, "Privacy, Publicity and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media," 88 Yale L.J. 1577, 1596. The Court of Appeals looked at Motschenbacher v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (9th Cir.1974) for precedent. Ford, like R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., used an imitation of Midler’s voice in their commercial to give the views an impression that Midler was singing for them.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moines In 1965, a group of students including John and Mary Tinker decided to wear black armbands to school in protest of America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. When the principals in the school district heard about their plan, fearing disruption due to the protest, they made a new rule prohibiting armbands at all the schools in the district. This caused some of the kids to change their minds about wearing the armbands, but not John and Mary.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Saturday, December 9th, the US Supreme Court voted 5-4 to abandon the hand recounts in the counties and set a new hearing for December 11th. This hearing lasted for two solid days, and on December 12th, the US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Bush v Gore and reversed the verdict made by the Florida Supreme Court. The court ruled that: not all ballots were being treated equally and thus a violation of the Constitution 's 14th amendment equal protection clause, the Florida Supreme Court would be required to set up new voting practices and standards to follow in the recount. However, the justices were split 5-4 over how to solve the problem at hand. Five of the justices expressed that the initial date already set for the recounted votes should infact…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section 504 Case Study

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Background Information Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was passed during the Civil Rights movement. The section served as an amendment to a document created by the Chicago Office of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The Vocational Rehabilitation and Other Rehabilitation Services, Section 794 provides individuals with disabilities, protection from discrimination within any organization or program that receives federal financial assistance. Before the Act, individuals were expected to deal with physical and mental disabilities without accommodations and received minimal assistance from society. Americans with disabilities, faced discrimination in schools, the job force, and living arrangements before the act was passed.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holder court case the justices ruled that Section four is unconstitutional and that the methods used can no longer be used to give preclearance. The majority decision, given by Chief Justice John G. Roberts points to the past skepticism about needing to update the Voting Rights Act.4 First he states the act developed have an expiration date, and that time is well passed according to the majority decision. He also discusses the tenth amendment, giving powers to the states that are not specifically given to the federal government, was part of the main argument for the majority opinion because the justices thought that this removes authority from the states, who constitutionally should be treated equally.4 Second the chief justice points multiple times to the fact that times have changed since the historic 1965 case fifty years ago.4 He describes that in 1965 this part of the Voting Rights Act made sense and had a real purpose, but section four was developed with an expiration date for the quickly changing United States. Since the United States was changing it was necessary for Congress to completely change the Voting Rights Act, but failed to change section four. Lastly the decisions leaves Congress the obligation to change section five, based on the newly developed United States and modern times which may now consist of a growing Latino population.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The twenty six amendment say that the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state an account of age . This amendment is Important because it gave 18 year olds and people older than 18 the right to vote because if they didn’t have the right there wouldn’t be enough people to vote in elections and other voting rights that would affect the way we live today. This amendment was made in 1971 by President Richard M. Nixon the states ratified that amendment in July of that year. This amendment is still affecting the way we live today because without it the way we live would be different.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Griswold's arguments were totally against Connecticut. He proved Connecticut that the law which he proposed was totally against the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...nor deny any person the equal protection of the laws,". His arguments mainly focused on that married couples have the right and freedom to do whatever they like to do. There can be no one as hindrance to stop them from doing what they want to.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The company understood the legal practices and procedures leading to a ruling of a First Amendment violation (Epstein, 2011). By releasing their film through a private industry, Citizens United established their freedom to withhold donor information from government bodies so long as they were following established laws (Epstein, 2011). The only exceptions to the First Amendment are criminal provisions, none of which were performed by Citizens United (Epstein, 2011). Epstein makes the argument that for governing bodies, it becomes more difficult to justify additional unprecedented restrictions in the presence of a multitude of additional restrictions (Epstein, 2011). With so many restrictive laws in place against corporations, it would be unconstitutional to infringe upon the company’s right to express their support of an independent body such as a super PAC (Epstein, 2011).…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separate but equal, Jim Crow and Plessy v. Ferguson By Paula Diaz, The New York Times NEW ORLEANS, LA— On June 7, 1982, Mr. Homer Plessy challenged the constitutionality of “separate but equal”. He boarded a train in New Orleans that was intended only for whites and allowed himself to be arrested. Though he had the appearance of a white man, because he was one-eighth African American, He was not allowed to ride in the whites-only car.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pewresearch.com took a survey on Republicans, Democrats, and Independents on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they are meant today or as they were originally written. Most Republicans said that the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they were originally written (69% to 29%). On the other hand, Democrats (70% to 26%) and Independents (48% to 47%) said that the court rulings today should be based on what the U.S. Constitution means in current times. In total 49% of the people that were surveyed, said that the Supreme Court should base rulings on today’s meaning of it. 46% of people surveyed said that they should rule court cases by how the U.S. Constitution was originally written.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Colorado Civil Rights Commission, I am ruling in favor of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Both sides presented very good arguments, and for the majority of the case, I struggled to make a decision. In the end, my final decision was made based on what the effects of allowing Phillips to abuse this law would be. If Phillips were allowed to discriminate based on his religious beliefs, it would make it possible for more people to do so, to the point where the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act would be rendered useless. Both sides had their rights violated, but initially it was only Charlie and David that did.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s current age of media sharing and politics, having a view that is unpopular to another person’s view can create great personal or financial harm. We are daily hearing stories about how a person’s personal views were expressed, often times privately, and then somehow that information was accessed and disseminated to the public. Then the public outcry begins to boycott a company because of one person’s personal views. There are many cases, large and small, where a business has suffered or failed simply because one person or owner had a political or religious view that was unpopular or disliked by a specific group of…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays