The case would be much stronger if the student made more reference to the text instead of just stating what the character says. Sentence structure also seems repetitive. There is are three instances where "Lord Darlington" is the opening to three sentences, two of which were back to back. Moving on to the ladies of the play, the student does very well at saying what their values are and provides decent evidence to support their claim. Overall, this student does a good job at answering the prompt, but since they have some slight flaws, such as little support to defend their answer to Lord Darlington's values, and some repetitive structure, this student received a five. This student actually did receive a five, meaning my judgement of it was on
The case would be much stronger if the student made more reference to the text instead of just stating what the character says. Sentence structure also seems repetitive. There is are three instances where "Lord Darlington" is the opening to three sentences, two of which were back to back. Moving on to the ladies of the play, the student does very well at saying what their values are and provides decent evidence to support their claim. Overall, this student does a good job at answering the prompt, but since they have some slight flaws, such as little support to defend their answer to Lord Darlington's values, and some repetitive structure, this student received a five. This student actually did receive a five, meaning my judgement of it was on