Elements Of Scots Law

Improved Essays
In 1707 the Acts of Union were approved by the Westminster Parliament and by the Parliament of Scotland. With the Acts of Union, England and Scotland were declared united ‘by the Name of Great Britain’.
Scots law is a legal system which includes elements of civil law and common law. Scots law is based on several sources of law: the legislation or statute law, a written enactment of legal rules passed by the Parliament; the common law: judicial precedent, institutional writings and custom.
Legislation is the primary source of Scots law and it is decided and approved by the parliamentary will. There are three sources of legislation binding in Scots law:
- European legislation
- UK legislation
- Scottish legislation
The law-making power of the
…show more content…
Regulations are directly applicable to EU Member States by giving rights to citizens. Directives instruct Member States to take action in their national legislatures. Treaties deal with broad objectives of EU law, such as freedoms or personal rights.
Another source of Scots law is the common law derived from the decisions of courts, known as judicial precedent. Judicial precedent refers to rules produced by the courts without the legislation. The main feature of judicial precedent is the so called ‘stare decisis’ which means that a subordinate court must be bound to a higher court decision.
The two main conditions that make a judicial precedent binding
…show more content…
An example of a case of a binding judicial precedent is the case “Donoghue v Stevenson”: it was stated that the manufacturer is responsible for the product sold.
The institutional writings and the custom are other two sources of Scots law. Institutional writings are written by jurists about various areas of Scots law. The main topics covered by them are: early decision of the courts, Scottish customary practices and the laws of other jurisdictions.
One of the most important institutional writer was James Dalrymple who wrote ‘Institutions of Scots Law’ in 1681. It covered obligations, property and succession. Another important institutional writer was Baron D. Hume who wrote ‘Commentaries on the law of Scotland respecting Crimes (1797).
Although custom is a source of Scots law, today many customary practices have been blended into the law. However, in theory the custom can still be considered a source of law but the custom should be:
- recognised and practiced
- well-defined and certain
-recognise principles of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What is the Current Scottish Legal Aid Policy? Legal aid in Scotland is the responsibility of the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB), an institutional body created by the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 (Scottish Legal Aid Board, 2016). The actions of SLAB are consistent and stable but the Scottish government decides the aims of legal aid policy and the Scottish Parliament can implement legislative changes to the policy (Edinburgh & Scottish Legal Aid Board, 2016). The Scottish Legal Aid Board regulates the distribution of financial aid for those who are engaged or need to engage in legal proceedings but have financial constraints. This includes the review of legal aid applications, fraud investigation, and distribution of aid (Edinburgh & Scottish…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How legislations become a statutory law??? To begin with a Bill must be made it can be defined as a document, which holds a draft application for a new law, or an amending proposal for a modification to an existing law. It must obtain the backing of each House before it can become legislation. First Reading- Parliament begins its formal deliberation of a Bill with the First Reading.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Definition The common law was originally developed in historical England and is the result of judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom, and precedent (Satterlee, 2014, p. 86). Summary The article “Oregon Occupiers Call for Common Law Grand Jury” written by Steve Almasy and Sara Weisfeldt, CNN states that Ammon Bundy, the man leading a group of armed protesters who have taken over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, called for a common law grand jury to examine what he called violations of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In attempting to make the mechanisms by which discrete individual action becomes legal and institutional, and vice versa. A cultural analysis of law, or Ewick and Silbey’s Constitutive theory, suggest that the law is a product of the reciprocal nature of meaning-making: people create meaning as they engage in society. Ewick and Silbey start this inquiry not through a textual analysis of philosophy, statue, or constitutional law, but rather by…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This concept came about when cases or decisions became common knowledge. For example, in the English legal community, judges who had heard of similar cases may have treated cases alike or even establish some standard of offences. This is known as unwritten laws. Comparative to today 's judges and lawyers referring to earlier decisions to influence or gauge judges when reaching a verdict. Trial lawyers spend a large portion of their time presenting similar or identical cases in hopes of persuading the judge to reach a similar decision.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminal laws are punishable, with determination of guilt. Actions taken against criminals can also be looked at as a deterrent for others to not partake in similar or the same actions. The four primary sources of law are the U.S. Constitution, statutes passed by Congress and/or state legislations,…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Delegated legislation (also known as secondary legislation) have many benefits with regards to passing Laws. Due to the sheer volume of Laws that need passing in England, leaving The Houses of Parliament unable to meet with the demands, thus the allowance of a second party to pass an Act (through the parenting/enabling act), both the House of Commons and the House of Lords can continue with their ever-changing workload. Made up of two separate houses, The Houses of Parliament consist of; the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. 650 majoritarian elected individuals known as ‘Members of Parliament’ (or MPs for short), make up the House of Commons, and each MP represents a constituency, such as Conservative party member Karen Bradley who represents Leek.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stare decisis means the use of precedents when making legal decisions. This is found in common law system but not in civil and Islamic law systems (Opolot, 1980). Stare decisis allows judges to look back at past cases and make their judgment based on the outcome of the past case (Darbyshire, 2001). Stare decicis forms a precedent that is to be used from that moment forward (Opolot, 1980). In civil law system judges are not to look back at past cases to render their decisions.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Acts of parliament often provide a general instruction on the law but not how it would work in theory. It is therefore up to judges to examine specific facts for each case, interpret legislation and administer the law in line with their findings. Common law is consistent yet flexible in that it is a constantly evolving whilst maintaining its system of precedent. It allows the courts to create rules of law based on individual and new cases which can be used in future cases to offer guidance. With equity as a characteristic of this system built on precedent, a common set of principle are applied to all people regardless of their status and procedure have been set to provide equality and fairness to all.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judiciary is the section of government which is tasked with interpreting laws passed by parliament. In the USA the constitution established the Supreme Court under article 3 of the constitution. It is the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment. In the UK, a supreme court was established in 2009 to provide greater clarity in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. In the UK, under the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty, it is parliament which makes the laws but it is the courts who are tasked with interpreting them.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays