Scotland Act 1998 Case Study

Improved Essays
The Scotland Act 1998 was responsible for the devolution of significant areas of civil law such as family law, planning law and bankruptcy law to Holyrood. The administrative workings of the Scottish legal systems are far removed from that from the rest of the UK. This includes the structures of the courts, court procedures and the funding of legal aid. (Scottish Parliament Information Centre, 2014). In Scotland, there are 3 main types of civil courts, namely, the Sheriff Courts, Court of Session and since 2009 the UK Supreme Court.

By far the most important and most widely used court in Scotland is the Sheriff Court. Since 1975, Scotland has been divided into 6 sheriffdoms with 142 sheriffs in post, there are currently 39 Sheriff Courts
…show more content…
The creation of the UK Supreme Court under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c 4) meant that the most senior judges were now separated from the Parliamentary process. (Legislation.gov.uk, 2005). The 2005 Constitutional reform also removed role of the Lord Chancellor, who’s role was previously seen to be undemocratic due to an overlap of this duties within the three branches of government in the appointment of justices. This role was removed in favour of the Independent Appointments Committee (JAC) which was set up to appoint justices to the supreme court making the entire appointment process clearer and more accountable. (Walker,1992). The Supreme Court is currently presiding over by 12 Justices, who are tasked with maintaining the high standards set by the Appellate Committee. (Supremecourt.uk, 2009). A recent example of an contact case appeal submitted to the Supreme court comes in the form of Carlyle (Appellant) v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc UKSC 13. The fcats were that the cases concerned a dispute between a property developer and a bank over the provision and purpose of a loan. Mr Carlyle met with the bank and made it clear that the money would be used to build a house as well as buy land, the bank approved this. However, at a later date the bank disagreed with the building element of the loan and raised action against Mr Carlyle for £1,449,660. The court decided that the bank entered into a legally binding contract with Mr Carlyle, which included the building of a house and must respected the contract and allowed Mr Carlyle’s appeal. As well as being the chief appeals court in the land, the Supreme court is also concerned with the law relating to the devolution of powers. These are cases about if the devolved governments have acted within their respective powers or if they have failed to comply with any duties imposed on them. (McLaren and Bisacre, 2016).

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mighty Judgement Summary

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Mighty Judgement, Philip Slayton talks about the Supreme Court of Canada as a government institution which needs reform on the premises that Supreme Court of Canada is powerful, paternalistic, competent, undemocratic, and secretive. Slayton begins with the question of whether judges make or interpret the law and whether they should be doing only one of those things. Also, he describes the historical past of the Supreme Court, and how the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms affected the cases which reach the Supreme Court. Slayton also analyzed the Supreme Court of Canada and came up with possible overdue reforms based on his experience as a lawyer, academic, and a previous Supreme Court clerk.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch is made up of court systems and judicial administrations. It is arranged in many layers, overlapping jurisdictions, and is hierarchy in structure of courts. Texas has divided the courts system into two sections: criminal and civil. At the top of the chain are the Texas Supreme Courts for the civil cases and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal that hears criminal cases. At the bottom are numerous local courts.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the Current Scottish Legal Aid Policy? Legal aid in Scotland is the responsibility of the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB), an institutional body created by the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 (Scottish Legal Aid Board, 2016). The actions of SLAB are consistent and stable but the Scottish government decides the aims of legal aid policy and the Scottish Parliament can implement legislative changes to the policy (Edinburgh & Scottish Legal Aid Board, 2016). The Scottish Legal Aid Board regulates the distribution of financial aid for those who are engaged or need to engage in legal proceedings but have financial constraints. This includes the review of legal aid applications, fraud investigation, and distribution of aid (Edinburgh & Scottish…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chief Justice John Roberts The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. The modern Supreme court is As envisioned in Article 3 of the constitution by the framers still the same, one of the 3 branches of government. It does play a more prominent role in our everyday lives than what the framers envisioned it.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather than simply deciding which level of government ought to have jurisdiction over a particular public policy, the judiciary has now been invited to hold legislative decisions up to scrutiny against a higher constitutional standard, and perhaps decide that no level of government can legislate in a given area. Section 525 of the Charter gives the courts of Canada their authority to declare legislation inoperative, but it is section 16 that prescribes their mandate, guaranteeing as it does the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Charter "subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." Thus the rights set out are not absolute rights, but require that the judiciary…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts had a vital role in this case as the final outcome would not have been reached if it were not for the court hierarchy. The charge against Eades of “inciting a person under 16 to commit an act of indecency towards him” is a table two indictable offence, meaning that it is to be dealt with summarily (in the Local Court), unless the prosecution nominates that it should be heard in the District Court. The case was first heard in the local court where Eades was acquitted.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The three tier system of the courts is still used, but the court system is much more effective and centralized thanks to the changes by these…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the following paper you will see the correlations between the three major components of the Canadian criminal justice system. First we must examine each of the components of the criminal justice system alone before we get to understand how they overlap together. First of all, there is the police, the courts and the corrections. The police are the law enforcers and maintainers of order throughout Canada. There are three levels of policing in Canada; municipal, provincial and federal, there are some circumstances that they work together to accomplish a common goal.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles Of Judicial Judges

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The role of the judiciary is to administer justice to all citizens and it comprises of courts that take decisions on a very large number of cases. Judicial independence is the keystone of Canadian judiciary. That is the reason, the judiciary is an independent from other branches of government, the executive and legislative. The main role of a judge is to interpret laws. Judicial independence means that, the other organs of the government must not restrain the functioning and should not interfere with its decision of the judiciary in such a way that is unable to do justice.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Police Conviction

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To start the procedure the target is arrested, this is the followed by the policemen telling their name their rank as an officer and the station they also tell them why they are being detained. After the subject in hand cuffed and calm they pat search them down to assure there is no danger towards them. They are then put into the back of the police car and transported to the station, when they get back to the station the offender is stripped of all things that can be used to harm themselves. They remain in a shirt and shorts, any short string, bras, shoes, shoelaces and jewellery. Before getting put into a cell, their finger and palm prints are taken and their photos are also taken.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Equity in New Zealand, its relationship with common law, and the ‘fusion’ debate The equitable jurisdiction was defined in 1932 as “that body of rules administered by our English courts of justice which, were it not for the operation of the Judicature Acts, would be administered only by those courts which would be known as courts of Equity”. The New Zealand legal system is based on English common law and therefore the principles of Equity as they stand today are rooted in English history. However, following the implementation of the Judicature Act 1908 (NZ) and subsequent legal developments, the views of the New Zealand courts with respect to the intermingling of equitable and common law remedies can be observed to now be markedly…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, in a move towards a more formal separation of powers, the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act proposed a number of changes to the role, which essentially removed the legislative and judicial functions of the incumbent. The Lord Chancellor is no longer head of the judiciary. A role subsequently performed by the Lord Chief Justice. Furthermore, the act established a Supreme Court separate from Parliament and Government for the first time in history, with an independent committee to recommend judicial appointments, known as the Judicial Appointments Commission.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays