Science Vs Religion Essay

Improved Essays
I do not believe that science and religion are completely irreconcilable, though this balanced relationship may not be achieved in this lifetime or the next. This society has encouraged a competitive “us” vs. “them” world view, where your opinion is always right and anyone who disagrees is automatically wrong, removing the option to even consider or compromise with the other point of view. With that being said, in a perfect world where respect is given to both sides and compromise is common, I favor the belief that science and religion can be reconciled to complement each other, with two complementary books: “…the book of nature [science] and the book of scripture [the Bible]” (Dixon 17). There in fact are times in the past when science and religion have been at peace (Larson 21; Dixon …show more content…
I believe that the two sides (religion and science) are opposites and that opposites can in fact attract each other, but extremists, who speak the loudest and make the most drama for the media and the gossips often act as though the two sides cannot be reconciled and block out any opportunity to allow anything else to be …show more content…
Dixon states, “The conflict [whether the earth was round] was not between empirical science and authoritarian religion but rather between differing views within the Catholic Church about how to interpret nature and scripture, especially when they seem to disagree” (18). We live in such a world where religious and scientific communities seem to almost always constantly at war with each other, disrespecting the other opinion as soon as it is expressed. The extremists are convinced that the other side consists entirely of short-sighted loons or the spawn of Satan sent to misguide their poor, innocent children, all the while declaring themselves as “enlightened” and automatically disregarding anything the others have to say, even if it stands on solid

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In our modern day, science seems to (or sometimes attempts to) trump the Christian Bible in every way for some. It’s as if modern science can’t see similarities or agreements between the two, so one must choose one or the other. In John H. Walton’s “Human Origins and The Bible,” he explains that the Bible does not contain any kind of “scientific revelation” and whatever science is within the Bible would have been general knowledge for everyone. But in our present day of the 21st century, many feel that science and the Bible must work together somehow, but with all of the answers science is providing, it feels like an attack on our beliefs.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Entwistle book there were many times to where I would stop and ask “Could a person change their view on religion and science. For instance, is it possible for a person to become a true believer in science and then through Christ could they become a person who is a Theologize?”. As well as, with allies and enemies, at this point in time in the world, as the perspectives are changes and as a society we are more open on how people think and act. In the world now is religion and science allies? I know that we can’t be enemies because as our society is forever changing we are more acceptable to other views; we are more aware that there is something bigger than us.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science ultimately defeats religion in the moment Jan…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks’ video “Science versus Religion,” Rabbi Sacks talks to three different atheist scientists who are working on the frontline of scientific breakthrough. He talks to them to see if science and religion can agree on certain topics or if they will forever be in conflict. (add more) Neuroscientist, Baroness Susan Greenfield was the first person Rabbi Sacks conversed with. She is a professor at Oxford, currently researching the human conscience and (attempting) to understand how the human conciseness is generated from brain cells.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author introduces a preface about issues and controversies in relation to science and religion, some aspects and characteristics about them, and also, he shows the goals for this chapter. Through his introduction, he manifests that the relation between religion and science are two great cultural forces that build and organize every aspect of human life. In addition, he affirms that this chapter will help us to think systematically, and intelligently about the relationship between these two great cultural forces, but also, we will not solve them because the issues involved in them are many and convoluted. In fact, Stratton says that the philosophical commitments inserted into science establish a lot of unnecessary controversies of religion and…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people still struggle with trying to fit scientific discoveries of even theories with their religious beliefs. When scientists try to reason out the creation of the world and arrive at theories like the Big Bang Theory that clash with biblical stories, like the story of Genesis in this case, some people assume that Christianity and science can't possibly align. Science is not the only thing Christianity is separated from; there is a similar situation with…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the reading from week three “Religion and Science in the 1920s Collected Commentary” four primary viewpoints are defended. These are: There is no conflict between religion and modern science, there is no way to reconcile religion and modern science, science and religion can coexist in the same belief system, and science and religion support and complement each other. Each of these viewpoints was defended thoroughly by highly regarded intellectuals of their time period. The idea that there is no conflict between religion and modern science is primarily addressed by Frederick C Grant. Grant was the most prominent spokesperson for this position because he defined what it meant to have no conflict between science and modern religion.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries, religion has been a topic of great debate and interest, stemming from the validity of ideals to reasons why people believe in it in the first place. Despite all the efforts over time to thwart religion, it has managed to remain as a prominent structure. One question that seems to always be brought to the table is how religion continues to exist in light of the continual advances of science. The reason religion continues to exist today is not because the furthering of science leads to disproving religion, but rather because religion addresses questions that currently not even the advances of science can answer, giving people a sense of unity and congregation based upon two key emotions: hope and fear.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bruce does make a point to say that, while people see religion and science as conflicting opposites, religion is challenged less by specific science than by the underlying logic of sciences, as the logic causes people to look for answers and “undermines the notion of a fixed and unchanging…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason the world can be reconciled through the message of the Bible is because God accepts everyone’s mistakes and forgives us. With the proper change from us, we can find our purpose as a whole. Evolution in a Christian worldview perspective accepts change with the respect to God’s presence and guidance. The age of the Earth in a Christian’s worldview is only six thousand years old and was created in seven days. From a scientism perspective, the world cannot be reconciled through the message of the Bible because it is solely on hard facts and evidence.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, now we have historians of science who not only agree with this notion but also reject the idea that religion and science are not compatible. They have gone ahead to write volumes refuting “the conflict thesis”: the idea that religion and science are essentially in conflict (Seiler). For example, Stark; one of the most contemporary advocates for the new view, published his book For the Glory of God dedicating a chapter to the notion that the philosophical groundwork on which modern science developed was laid, by…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evolution vs Religion For hundreds of years, religion and science have not gotten along well. Each, having their own view, they try to convince or say that the others view is wrong and that should not be taught. Hundreds of years ago, famous scientists have been tried by the church due to their beliefs, only because they do not agree with the church and go against the bible. Now, science is something that many believe in because there is prof of where the scientists ideas come from but even so, religious conservatives argue the facts. Evolution is a big reoccurring conflict in both science and religion dating back to the 1800’s when Charles Darwin published his book, The Origin of Species and even earlier.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War between Science and Religion “Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus of Thor – but they have few followers now.” Sir Arthur C. Clarke In the beginning there was nothing: just darkness. Then out of nothing appeared everything.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Mastin, 2008) Despite the lack of scientific methods and factual basis, it was still deemed as scientifically friendly. Eventually, a transition occurred where analytical philosophy was based out of metaphysical schools. This development allowed for a closer connection between science and religion leading to its rise, as well as the field of philosophy of religion. (Fehige, "Contributions of Philosophy") Through the field of philosophy and religion, science could begin to appear in academic articles in conjunction with topics like creationism. Although the philosophy of religion helped lead to the development of the field, it did not lack its controversies.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays