Science Vs Religion

Improved Essays
Do science and religion overlap in any form when considering the topic of evolution? Fundamentally science and religion strive to answer different questions. Science focusing on the how, whereas religion focuses on the why. However, where both of these entities share common ground is in their most basic purpose; to discover the truth. The sorts of questions that religion is concerned with verses the purpose of science are both key factors of the similarities and differences that arise between science and religion on the topic of evolution. These help to expand the information available for describing the common ground that they both share, and how they can reconcile when it comes to evolution.

Science as a whole acts as a collective whose
…show more content…
The majority of these questions are concerned with mainly the ‘why’, and less on ‘how’. An example of one of these questions is why are we here? There is no logical way for science to currently answer this question; as it is an ethical question, unable to be proved by empirical science. This question is best answered by the Bible. According to Chapter 1 of Genesis, we see the phrase “God saw that it was good”. It also says that God created man is his own image, this however still doesn’t explain why we are here. Further on in the bible we read and find that he spoke well of the male and female and showed this pride he entrusted us with his creation, and gave us stewardship over the earth and its other life. Therefore, this question is directly linked to the topic of evolution. If we were created in God’s image, as the bible states, then there is no logical reason for evolution to have occurred for us to get to this level of complexity. This where the main debates concerning religion and science originate. This huge difference in reasoning allows for some common ground to be demonstrated between the …show more content…
This principle is one of the main elements that is shared as common ground between the two mediums. The ultimate issue between the measure of common ground is that both sides have been known to overstretch their side’s perspectives. A religious view that denies all scientific knowledge will ultimately fail due to irrelevancy. On the other hand, a purely scientific without a larger philosophical will also be doomed. Neither sides can hold all the answers, but together they can strengthen the other side. Therefore, the common ground between science and religion, specifically on the topic of evolution, is minimal but important. They overlap at the origin of evolution. In one form, science would never have strived towards discovering evolution if it weren’t for the religious views of Victorian Europe pushing Charles Darwin to construct his book ‘The Origin of Species’. Another form of the overlap is a commonly believed theory, involving evolution being God’s tool. This theory states that evolution has occurred but was somewhat instigated by God himself; this is often linked to the belief that God also caused The Big

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    “Evolution as Fact and Theory” by Stephan Jay Gould outlines the constant taxing debate over evolution among creationists and evolutionists. He outlines the major issues that fuel the dispute and provides the logical and scientific approach to evolution for a clear argument against the claims of creationists. He firstly, provides a thorough explanation of the misconceptions of the definitions; “theory” and “Fact’. In the common vernacular a fact may be perceived as undeniable information with absolute certainty. (gould)…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Analysis of & critical response to Alvin Plantiga’s EAAN In the book Science and Religion: are they compatible? Plantiga seeks to establish the idea that theism is perfectly compatible with modern science, which he does rather successfully in his argument against Daniel Dennet. He accomplishes this by addressing one of the most controversial subjects in the Science-Religion relationship, evolution.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning scientific theories supported christians and their beliefs. Science was in parallel with God being the creator of the world and his everlasting effect in how it rotates today. This allowed there to be an alliance with science, nonetheless, when the new Darwin theory came out everything changed. Unlike Newton theory, Darwin believed that there was a naturalist creation. This theory conflicts in several ways that christians have known to grow up with.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of evolution is not compatible with religion, or Christianity. Though there are many Christians who believe that God used evolution in the creation of the world, this is not a valid biblical view. Genesis states that the origin of life and all organisms were created individually by one creator. The theory of evolution is vary contradictable to religion.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The foundation of the theory of evolution was not to attack religion but to seek reason to the world around us, as all scientific discoveries do. It is up to society to look past our moral biases to truly understand data of scientific discoveries to…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Theory Evolution a simple four syllable word. A word that not only changed the way we view animals and ourselves but also sparked debates. Unfortunately this paper is not based on the 1960’s classic Inherit the wind by Stanley Kramer. Which was about whether or not evolution should be taught in schools. No, in fact, that word has created yet another fire.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a separation from science and religion when they should go hand in hand. Evolutionist, however understand that the conflict between evolution and creation is there but they look for the concrete evidence of why. Darwinism and Christianity are the two sides of the argument and those that have accepted Darwinism have made them no longer believe in creation. This new way of thinking impacted Christianity and their morals within society.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    231 If Darwin thinks that species are weeded out through the process of natural selection, this would appear to negate what Paley believes, which is an intelligent Creator. Darwin preserves the ideologies put forth by Paley, in which a successor will not possess qualities, which are harmful to its creator or “possessor” as Darwin calls it. The possibility for Darwin’s theory to preserve any of Paley’s argument, involves seeing natural selection as part of a perfect design, with a creator who understands the designs, wherein some species are weaker than others, but not with the intention to do harm to other species.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: People should consider Biblical Creation as a competing explanation when answering the questions of the origins of life because both Biblical Creation and evolution takes faith, and even a logical thinker can be convinced that Biblical Creation is a worthy explanation. Society should realize that Evolution, not just Biblical Creation, takes faith. Opponents to Biblical Creation believe it is not a valid argument because they consider the Bible as religious dogma that is the result of ‘faith’, not scientific fact. However, many ignore that evolution is not fact either, but a lens in which information is interpreted.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Evolution as Fact and Theory,” Stephen Gould defenses Charles Darwin’s theory of Evolution over the beliefs of creationist on God creating all organisms in the world. To further his support, he states his three arguments which are observational evidence, the imperfection of nature, and transitions found in fossil records to demonstrate that even though evolution is just a theory, there are plentiful evidence of facts that supports it. The essay was not just about justifying the theory of evolution to the creationist but also to reject the ideas of blindfolded views on scientific creationism. Throughout the essay, Gould acknowledges many of the major perspectives of the scientific world to support the theory of evolution that…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion continues to argue against Darwin’s theories so throughout the history of time Darwin’s theories and Religious theories have been on opposite sides of a…

    • 1297 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion answered these questions with make-believe stories of gods and goddesses and other ‘supernatural forces’ beyond human understanding. Science is able to explain these ‘supernatural forces’ with proof and evidence. Science and religion have always been at war. Science is based on observation and what we can explain using formulae and theorem. Religious arguments on the other hand, are questionable in nature and require faith.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is creationism science, pseudoscience, or non-science? Support your argument with an analysis of the distinction between science, pseudoscience, and non-science. Mainstream society is very familiar with the word “science” and that without a doubt science plays a detrimental role in our lives. However for many people there seems to be a discrepancy about the correct distinguishiment between science, pseudo-science and non-science. The aims of this essay are to establish the differences between science, pseudo-science and non-science, before then examining the appropriate categorization of “creationism science”.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This, at first, greatly hindered scientific advancement. The church – because of it’s own prideful blindness – spent too much time opposing the new theories, instead of engaging them and really considering them. They could not have considered that the new findings could bring them closer to an understanding of God and His creation. We must not fall into the same trap. We should not let our own dogma get in the way of scientific advancement.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays