Essay On Science Vs Religion

Improved Essays
I learned that a person’s belief can affect all they do in science and it matters to me because it is fascinating how many people feel as though science and personal beliefs should never collide. Science begins with curiosity. Without curiosity, where does one start to formulate an idea? Despite any personal beliefs, everyone has a question to ask, even if they might think they know all the answers. Before class began, I often wondered how science and a person’s personal belief can affect the things they research and the experiments they perform. In high school, on the very first day of school, I remember my chemistry teacher giving us a series of survey questions. Some of the questions on that survey was whether or not we believe that scientists can be religious, and if all scientists were open minded. As a part of the curriculum, we were also required to learn about …show more content…
What I also ponder about is why there are religion vs. science debates. Why can’t they be one? What most atheists or agnostic do not understand is the idea of faith. They seem to think that it is a crazy notation to believe anything the bible says. What they fail to understand is that faith is something that is felt. There are times when a person turn to their faith when all has failed. Miracles do happen and it often cannot be explained. Can science result in a miracle? To me, miracles happen as a result of faith. I had a discussion with a student in my class. He is an agnostic. In his own words, “we were either made by something so powerful or created out of nothing”. This really had me thinking. What is it that people struggle with in pertaining to science and religion? Do they not feel that God can be science too? I am a believer in God and I believe that he is the creator of all things. Therefore, I do believe that something so powerful could create everything. Does being religious mean that I should not experiment and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hope Jahren’s memoir, Lab Girl, tells of her courageous journey to becoming an award-winning scientist. Throughout her book, she tells personal accounts of her trials and struggles she had to conquer to become as successful as she is. She discusses her battles with depression and bipolar disorders, along with the harsh comments because she is a female becoming a prosperous scientist. Through all her trials, she speaks of always knowing she belongs in a lab. Science and any form of spirituality usually do not go hand in hand.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Science is not a body of facts. Science is a state of mind” (Angier 490). Both essays, “The Canon” by Natalie Angier and “Scientific Literacy and the Habit of Discourse” by Thomas W. Martin, discuss that science is not a set of facts to be learned, but is best practiced through actions. These two articles approach the topic differently by using different rhetorical modes and styles. Even though the article’s main points have similarities, the essays contain many differences through their rhetorical modes, approaches, and writing styles.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Analysis of & critical response to Alvin Plantiga’s EAAN In the book Science and Religion: are they compatible? Plantiga seeks to establish the idea that theism is perfectly compatible with modern science, which he does rather successfully in his argument against Daniel Dennet. He accomplishes this by addressing one of the most controversial subjects in the Science-Religion relationship, evolution.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Delgado’s essay, “The Culture of Denial,” (2015), claims that mistrust in the scientific world is due to people’s beliefs, their ignorance and their personal agendas. Delgado demonstrates this with scientist discoveries, statistics, and explanations of people distrust in scientist conclusions, their religious beliefs and businesses apparent agendas. Delgado examines the mistrust, ignorance and the personal agendas of society in order to inform this culture to educate themselves and be open to new scientific findings. The intended audience for this essay is the general public, who is interested in the future of the scientific arena. I can relate to Christopher Delgado’s suggestion that this culture need to understand, educate,…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When scientists questioned against that theory, devoted followers of the Catholic Church criticized them saying that they believe that science is more important than God. In…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Entwistle with further reader of his book he breaks down the type of people there are when it comes two these two topics. You have those who are opposed to religion all together, you have people who are neutral to both of religion and science; to where they believe in both but don’t see how they correlate with each other, and then you have those are based everything on the word of God he calls these people theologizes; and everything else cannot be. As he breaks down the people in world he also goes into sub categorizing the three type of people in the world. He breaks this down to include that they are people in the world who believe in science but still have accounts of miracles that can happen, naturalist who believe that there is a correlation between science and religion due to the fact that science cannot answer all the questions that the world has and the Bible can, and those who base everything on God and his works and believes that God has given us the ability to have science through Him. Mr. Entwistle also go into, how the perspectives of others and their mentality of thinking and experiences can have an effect on how we think and react to religion and…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science ultimately defeats religion in the moment Jan…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miracles are of the supernatural. If you believe in God, you will ultimately believe in…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of religion versus science has been a long ongoing debate that seem to have no end in sight. This is the major theme that runs through the essay “God, Science and Imagination,” written by Wendell Berry as it explores the different realms of the religious scholars and scientific scholars in their support of the stand that they take in regards to the existence of God, explaining the inherent faith of Christians in a supernatural being and mere imagination. Jane Goodall, “In the Forest of Gombe,” whereby she delves into the relationship between science and religion. The association between the fundamentalist view and religious scholars view on the existence of God and faith has been hampered by the fundamentalist’s…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author introduces a preface about issues and controversies in relation to science and religion, some aspects and characteristics about them, and also, he shows the goals for this chapter. Through his introduction, he manifests that the relation between religion and science are two great cultural forces that build and organize every aspect of human life. In addition, he affirms that this chapter will help us to think systematically, and intelligently about the relationship between these two great cultural forces, but also, we will not solve them because the issues involved in them are many and convoluted. In fact, Stratton says that the philosophical commitments inserted into science establish a lot of unnecessary controversies of religion and…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The only reason to study science before then, was out of curiosity or religious devotion. Christians and the Church had believed God created the universe and it’s laws of nature. To study and learn of this universe and it’s laws was to study and learn about the work of God. This caused more people to become scientists as they had a passion for their religion.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, most of the astronomers and scientists who contribute to these findings were religious men who certainly had no intention to attack the underlying theology. For example, Galileo was a God-fearing Catholic and when the pope threatened to excommunicate him, he recanted his statements which evoked belief in the heliocentric Copernican model. Moreover, many philosophers and scientists have gone to great lengths trying to accommodate their scientific findings with their personal theology; Protestantism or Catholicism. Religionists have therefore been seeking to reconcile science and religion. Moreover, the new breed of scholars asserts that religion, especially Christianity is the actual cause of science’s existence (Seiler).…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that science does not come from the roots of science and its theories. Science, in general, can give a full explanation to one thing, but does not fully fulfill the other. For instance, one can have a headache and there can be so many reasons as to why; one doctor can tell you “maybe you 're not drinking enough water,” but another can explicitly tell you what is precisely going on in your body. Therefore, if science is knowledge, then how come, two different doctors don’t agree upon an explanation? The issue is that science has diverse theories, many people decide to believe, however, there are some parts of science constrain the person’s beliefs.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion answered these questions with make-believe stories of gods and goddesses and other ‘supernatural forces’ beyond human understanding. Science is able to explain these ‘supernatural forces’ with proof and evidence. Science and religion have always been at war. Science is based on observation and what we can explain using formulae and theorem. Religious arguments on the other hand, are questionable in nature and require faith.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics