What Is The Relationship Between Science And Religion?

Good Essays
Science and religion are two words that are assumed to oppose each other due to the factual, logical basis of science and the faith in the unknown presented in religion. Yet these two disciplines share many commonalities and interactions that lead to the development of a field of study. Alfred White Northhead, a Protestant theologian, exceptionally expressed that God and nature work as one, indicating any change in the science nature, should lead to an alteration with how society comprehends God. (Olsen, 2) Throughout this paper it will be clear that science and religion are a field due to the commonalities the disciplines share, the overlap of knowledge seen in both topics and importantly the dispersion of the work among academics. This …show more content…
To begin, the rise of the field of science and religion was heavily influenced by the public figures that had made advancements in the understanding and application of the field. Church Fathers were a number of these individuals who took the extrinsic value of science to use in combination with the teachings of the church. One example was St. Augustine of Hippo. He was educated in pagan philosophy and in his adulthood found Christianity. (Adam, "When does the history of science begin") He claimed that to truly understand biblical references, one must have some knowledge of nature to understand references in scripture. An example was that when snakes shed their skin they become stronger, which can play an important role when referenced in scripture. (Adam, "When does the history of science begin") He is clear that one should never connect the specific stories from the bible to theories of nature as falsification of the theory can destroy the power of the scripture. St. Augustine 's views have been constantly referenced for centuries throughout the field of science and religion as it has continued to grow and develop. (Adam, "When does the history of science …show more content…
(Mastin, 2008) Despite the lack of scientific methods and factual basis, it was still deemed as scientifically friendly. Eventually, a transition occurred where analytical philosophy was based out of metaphysical schools. This development allowed for a closer connection between science and religion leading to its rise, as well as the field of philosophy of religion. (Fehige, "Contributions of Philosophy") Through the field of philosophy and religion, science could begin to appear in academic articles in conjunction with topics like creationism. Although the philosophy of religion helped lead to the development of the field, it did not lack its controversies. Devoted catholic philosophers voice their opinions with John Schellenberg stating that it was basically theology due to the fact it was governed by Christians. He believes that science needs to be incorporated into the field for a much need renewl. Hilary Putman voiced the opposite opinion, stating that it involved too much metaphysics. She stated that this transition was a mistake as religion should not need science to understand the scriptures. (Fehige, "Contributions of Philosophy") This was not the only event in philosophy that lead to the merge, but it was a substantial event despite a lack of backing from many analytical philosophers. (Fehige, "Contributions of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    POPPER, KUHN AND LATOUR'S EVALUATION OF THE ARGUMENTS Popper's philosophy is based on falsifiability, thus he would side with Lennox. There are a lot of gaps in the science when it comes to evolution and the origin of life. There are also a lot of phenomenons that Dawkins cannot explain by using pure science, because he believes that the specific explanations have not been discovered yet. Lennox uses falsifiability as his main argument in many situations to counter Dawkins' theories. Lennox uses God to explain all of these phenomenons and because God cannot be falsified by using science, Popper would side with Lennox rather than Dawkins.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cognitive science of religion provides a venue for a dialogue between science and religion because its conclusions may present fresh interpretations of previously complex theological ideas. Dr. Barret gives two examples of how cognitive science of religion may impact Christian theology in the future. The first, revelation, describes cognitive science of religion’s interpretation of general revelation, God revealing Himself in nature. Dr. Barret theorizes moral codes and mythologies may be part of God’s general revelation. I think it is a common view among Christians that God created an innate moral code within us.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Science Vs Religion Essay

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The science versus religion controversy is one in which I believe will continue on until the end of time. Dr. Charlie Townes, a Christian man and renowned scientist, considers the parallels of the two demonstrate they are fated to eventually unite (Townes, 1966). Many view science and religion as two completely separate realms, which are fundamentally different and pursue truth in distinctively unlike ways. On the religious front, many hold firm to their faith and historical beliefs; whereas, science intends to demystify the religious aspect and search for concrete answers. The difference between the two are the absolute qualities.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Science And Religion

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin with, religion and science are not mutually exclusive, many religious dominations accept evolution. For example, institutions such as catholic schools teach science and religion as requirement. Also, religious institutions support scientific research endeavors. This shows that faith in a higher being and science can work together to help educate and expand people’s minds. As opposed to choosing one from another.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This, at first, greatly hindered scientific advancement. The church – because of it’s own prideful blindness – spent too much time opposing the new theories, instead of engaging them and really considering them. They could not have considered that the new findings could bring them closer to an understanding of God and His creation. We must not fall into the same trap. We should not let our own dogma get in the way of scientific advancement.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion And Science Is Complement Each Other Introduction Science and religion are two entities that occupy an important position in the philosophy of science. The position of both branches of the discipline to give each other positive value in addressing the problems of life and humanity. It is caused by human nature as thinking beings who always want rationality. Humans are also experienced and witnessed to the problems associated with the dimensions of the mysteries in life that can not be solved except by reference to religion, so the existence of religions-which besides a belief system that requires the truth, as well as practical action against the application of trust (faith) who have recognized the truth through science methodology…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In religion, “where truths cannot be demonstrated, we accept them as a matter of faith” (Mead 173). When something could not be answered in science, it is left unsolved and not accepted until further attempt. With religion, however, when something can’t be explained, it is accepted by faith even if there is no explanation to prove it. Religion and science both provide something that the other doesn’t. For instance, religion provides us with hope.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Albert Einstein Religion

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Society tells us that when you become part of a certain religion, you adopt the full belief system of that Religion. Which is why, today, we have the argument between say, evolutionists and creationists. There is the notion that if you believe in the theories that the Bible may be telling you, then how can you believe in evolution or more simply: science. This barrier, therefore, is most importantly placed upon the two by society. It is a reason for much tension between religion and science, most notably on the topics of whether or not God is real, evolution and creation, physics, and even the argument on where microbes and viruses come from.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The issue of religion versus science has been a long ongoing debate that seem to have no end in sight.This is the major theme that runs through the essay “God, Science and Imagination,” written by Wendell Berry as it explores the different realms of the religious scholars and scientific scholars in their support of the stand that they take in regards to the existence of God, explaining the inherent faith of Christians in a supernatural being and mere imagination. Jane Goodall, “In the Forest of Gombe,” whereby she delves into the relationship between science and religion. The association between the fundamentalist view and religious scholars view on the existence of God and faith has been hampered by the fundamentalist’s…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both science and religion are aimed at providing us with the truth, yet they just utilize different ways of thinking to go about it. While science exists with a goal to explain how the world works, religion involves a desire to understand why things are the way they are. Science and religion both serve as sources of truth, and everything that is true comes from God. Therefore, a reasonable…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays