Science Vs Religion Essay

Improved Essays
I do not believe that science and religion are completely irreconcilable, though this balanced relationship may not be achieved in this lifetime or the next. This society has encouraged a competitive “us” vs. “them” world view, where your opinion is always right and anyone who disagrees is automatically wrong, removing the option to even consider or compromise with the other point of view. With that being said, in a perfect world where respect is given to both sides and compromise is common, I favor the belief that science and religion can be reconciled to complement each other, with two complementary books: “…the book of nature [science] and the book of scripture [the Bible]” (Dixon 17). There in fact are times in the past when science and religion have been at peace (Larson 21; Dixon …show more content…
I believe that the two sides (religion and science) are opposites and that opposites can in fact attract each other, but extremists, who speak the loudest and make the most drama for the media and the gossips often act as though the two sides cannot be reconciled and block out any opportunity to allow anything else to be …show more content…
Dixon states, “The conflict [whether the earth was round] was not between empirical science and authoritarian religion but rather between differing views within the Catholic Church about how to interpret nature and scripture, especially when they seem to disagree” (18). We live in such a world where religious and scientific communities seem to almost always constantly at war with each other, disrespecting the other opinion as soon as it is expressed. The extremists are convinced that the other side consists entirely of short-sighted loons or the spawn of Satan sent to misguide their poor, innocent children, all the while declaring themselves as “enlightened” and automatically disregarding anything the others have to say, even if it stands on solid

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For centuries, religion has been a topic of great debate and interest, stemming from the validity of ideals to reasons why people believe in it in the first place. Despite all the efforts over time to thwart religion, it has managed to remain as a prominent structure. One question that seems to always be brought to the table is how religion continues to exist in light of the continual advances of science. The reason religion continues to exist today is not because the furthering of science leads to disproving religion, but rather because religion addresses questions that currently not even the advances of science can answer, giving people a sense of unity and congregation based upon two key emotions: hope and fear.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, there were some people that had opinions that science was the method that disputed God and/or faith all together. This can be seen in a writing by David Hume in 1748, Hume was a philosopher from Scotland and was writing to disprove miracles. One of his very ideas of the essay was disproving the real presence. Hume says that “were the doctrine of the real presence ever so clearly revealed in scripture, it were directly contrary to the rules of just reasoning to give our assent to it.”…

    • 1373 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Science and religion have gone centuries not seeing eye to eye on anything. This has been a big topic of debate for as long as both of these ideas have created conflict between believers in the differing ideas. These ideas will continue to be argued for centuries to come, seeing already that some believe that they act as complete polar opposites of each other. It goes hand in hand with believers of Evolution and scientology versus the believers in the book of Genesis and creationism. Evolution can definitely show one view of how the world was created.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks’ video “Science versus Religion,” Rabbi Sacks talks to three different atheist scientists who are working on the frontline of scientific breakthrough. He talks to them to see if science and religion can agree on certain topics or if they will forever be in conflict. (add more) Neuroscientist, Baroness Susan Greenfield was the first person Rabbi Sacks conversed with. She is a professor at Oxford, currently researching the human conscience and (attempting) to understand how the human conciseness is generated from brain cells.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, now we have historians of science who not only agree with this notion but also reject the idea that religion and science are not compatible. They have gone ahead to write volumes refuting “the conflict thesis”: the idea that religion and science are essentially in conflict (Seiler). For example, Stark; one of the most contemporary advocates for the new view, published his book For the Glory of God dedicating a chapter to the notion that the philosophical groundwork on which modern science developed was laid, by…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate between science and religion has been a subject of discussion for years, whether they correspond with one another or they contradict each other’s view. Nonetheless one of the things science and religion, both have in common is the impact they have made throughout history. Science and religion have blossomed great thinkers and a broader knowledge of not only the world but also one's self. The religious authority couldn’t be threatened without amazing thinkers that put forth against theory. A few names that included those thinkers are men like Kepler, Galileo and Bacon whose philosophies pushed the barrier and let humans have more earthly views.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science Vs. Christianity

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people see science and religion as enemies, at war battling each other, however, others see science and religion as completely separate and unrelated facets of life. Many early scientific leaders were devout Christians, as are some scientific leaders today. Science can also enhance the spiritual life of believers. Christians rejoice in scientific discoveries that reveal the glory of God the creator. Famous scientist Galileo proves a scientific belief about the Earth orbiting around the Sun.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bible is another piece of evidence that proves religion and science truly can work together in peace, despite the reputation that it cannot. The most convincing answer to the question of whether the Bible conflicts with science is the idea that comparing the Bible to science is like a surgeon using a cookbook to guide him through a surgery. This is convincing to me because I believe many people fall into the idea that since the Bible and science say two different things that automatically means they contradict each other. In reality science is used to explain the natural world and religion is used to answer philosophical questions and let people get to know their creator. As you can see, those two purposes are so completely different that it does not make sense to compare the two on the same level.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So why is there a disparity between the two? Initially Natural Sciences and Religion were very intertwined with each other, while today they are thought to be polar-opposites. The emergence of Religion can be viewed as intelligent progression in human-societal evolution(cite). It is not known with certainty how the first religions evolved or their precise origin, but it seems that many modern day religions “evolved” or developed from more archaic and pantheist faiths. There is evidence of hunter-gathering societies performing rituals, signifying some sort of belief-system(cite).…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Faith And Science

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Are Science and Biblical Faith Compatible? The response to this question will vary largely depending on who is providing the answer or what aspect of life and/or world view is being considered. Many people believe that biblical faith and science are mutually exclusive or total enemies, if you may. However, very few understand that modern science is a product of Christian world view and that it cannot be taken away from biblical faith.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Just as science and religion do not completely mix together, they coexist. Although many believe that the two cannot be put together peacefully, there are many philosophers…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evolution vs Religion For hundreds of years, religion and science have not gotten along well. Each, having their own view, they try to convince or say that the others view is wrong and that should not be taught. Hundreds of years ago, famous scientists have been tried by the church due to their beliefs, only because they do not agree with the church and go against the bible. Now, science is something that many believe in because there is prof of where the scientists ideas come from but even so, religious conservatives argue the facts. Evolution is a big reoccurring conflict in both science and religion dating back to the 1800’s when Charles Darwin published his book, The Origin of Species and even earlier.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe the relationship between science and religion should be seen as a dialogue. According to Hough, “The premise that the relationship between science and religion is one of dialogue implies that the two disciplines overlap with each other and have parallels” (p. 40). I believe examination of the parallels between science and religion leads to progress in both areas. I am excited to read the ideas presented by Jeeves and Brown about the relationship between science and religion.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Mastin, 2008) Despite the lack of scientific methods and factual basis, it was still deemed as scientifically friendly. Eventually, a transition occurred where analytical philosophy was based out of metaphysical schools. This development allowed for a closer connection between science and religion leading to its rise, as well as the field of philosophy of religion. (Fehige, "Contributions of Philosophy") Through the field of philosophy and religion, science could begin to appear in academic articles in conjunction with topics like creationism. Although the philosophy of religion helped lead to the development of the field, it did not lack its controversies.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays