First let us dissect Nietzsche view of the will to power. As with Schopenhauer Nietzsche sees all things are based off of our primal will. Everything that is, is caused by this will. There are some key difference between Schopenhauer’s view of the will and Nietzsche’s view of the will. The topic is quite large and deserves its own thesis but the basics are that Schopenhauer’s view of will lead him to believe that the best way to exist is to give up, that your existence is solely suffering. Nietzsche in his later writings goes against this thought by having the opinion that we should all live with a will to power that affirms our existence. And in this affirmation of the will there will be actions that are representative of a healthy will to
…show more content…
Pedophiles that have romantic sexual desires for children tend to have been the victim of abuse themselves. (1) The thought is that the traumatic moment affected them so much that it permanently affected their ability to understand sex in the normal …show more content…
(1) Now by the understanding of the blocking of the healthy expression of will we can see that this event in the pedophiles childhood likely caused a block to their healthy natural sexual expression of their will. Since the normal pathway was “abused” out of them we can conclude that with sexual desires still present he will revert to the unhealthy pathway which was perpetrated against himself. This represents the theory that if there is some event or life situation that causes a block or disruption to the healthy expression of will that it is likely that an unhealthy pathway can form. Now if we apply this to the noble vs slave model you can see that the entire existence of the slave is based on the impedance to their expression of will. Their entire existence then forms up a new moral code that has grown to accept this new expression of unhealthy will as the proper morality. The slave class then will identify good with what is considered bad to the noble and what is bad to the slave is considered good for the noble. If a group of people all view morality a certain way it likely that their religious thoughts will be representative of said view of morality. This is what brings us to the slave religious of Judaism and its evolution into
Pedophiles that have romantic sexual desires for children tend to have been the victim of abuse themselves. (1) The thought is that the traumatic moment affected them so much that it permanently affected their ability to understand sex in the normal …show more content…
(1) Now by the understanding of the blocking of the healthy expression of will we can see that this event in the pedophiles childhood likely caused a block to their healthy natural sexual expression of their will. Since the normal pathway was “abused” out of them we can conclude that with sexual desires still present he will revert to the unhealthy pathway which was perpetrated against himself. This represents the theory that if there is some event or life situation that causes a block or disruption to the healthy expression of will that it is likely that an unhealthy pathway can form. Now if we apply this to the noble vs slave model you can see that the entire existence of the slave is based on the impedance to their expression of will. Their entire existence then forms up a new moral code that has grown to accept this new expression of unhealthy will as the proper morality. The slave class then will identify good with what is considered bad to the noble and what is bad to the slave is considered good for the noble. If a group of people all view morality a certain way it likely that their religious thoughts will be representative of said view of morality. This is what brings us to the slave religious of Judaism and its evolution into