The author of the article I read , she structured her argument very well basically got her point across. In the article it says “Some kids don't get enough to eat” With school being out and parents having to work all day. In the article “ School's out for summer” the author says “With so many households in which both parents are working , Summer is a scramble” No matter what people want to tell themselves. During the rest of the year fifteen million students get free or cut rate lunches and breakfast too , But only three million children are getting lunches through federal. Anna got across the point of kids not being able to get the meals they need due to parents working or not being able to afford it.
The author of the article I read , she structured her argument very well basically got her point across. In the article it says “Some kids don't get enough to eat” With school being out and parents having to work all day. In the article “ School's out for summer” the author says “With so many households in which both parents are working , Summer is a scramble” No matter what people want to tell themselves. During the rest of the year fifteen million students get free or cut rate lunches and breakfast too , But only three million children are getting lunches through federal. Anna got across the point of kids not being able to get the meals they need due to parents working or not being able to afford it.