School Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) incorporates three tiers of prevention in order to be effective for the entire school population: primary or universal, secondary or targeted, and tertiary or intensive. The three tier model is important so that at risk or high risk students receive additional needed supports. As the Kerr and Nelson textbook states in Chapter 2, “not all students (or staff) are going to be successful with just the universal level of intervention.” The function of each tier is to provide a positive and preventive approach to student behavior management. Our Kerr and Nelson textbook goes on to explain who is served within those three levels. Primary intervention supports all students and staff in all school settings
…show more content…
An administrator who desires to implement a SWPBIS framework should understand the commitment involved. Dr. Marcia Rock explains in her “Big D” podcast that “at least 6-12 months of planning need to take place before launching a School-Wide PBS program. Schools who try to do it more quickly often fail because they haven’t devoted enough time to thinking through all aspects of the program.” Moreover, Dr. George Sugai in a video segment of “School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Reaching All Students” said schools should “commit to [the] long term [because] organizations take 2-3 years to change”. After stressing the commitment required, there is a list of steps in Chapter 2 of the Kerr and Nelson textbook to follow in order to implement a PBIS …show more content…
In the “PBIS High School Video Overview” one teacher states, “the thing I like about PBIS structure is that you are not just going on feelings and what we think people feel like and what we think students feel like and what we think teachers want. Everything is data driven.” Internet resources reveal more testimonies from schools that have implemented these practices with successful outcomes, but School Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) is not just a theory or fad based on feelings or opinions. This approach has been studied for several years and there are evidences to support the effects. In Chapter 2 of the Kerr and Nelson textbook, evidences supporting the interventions at the primary tier include “improved student academic and social behavior”, “reductions in major and minor problem behaviors ….in preschool, elementary, middle, and high school settings”, “administrator time was saved”, and “instructional time was gained by students.” Within the secondary tier, the three interventions of social skills training, mentoring, and a CICO program were supported by empirical studies. These practices revealed promising results with it being noted that the CICO programs were not effective for some participating students. A mentoring program may be more effective for high schoolers who are less responsive to social skills training or the CICO plan. Research at the tertiary tier supports function-based interventions. Dr. Marcia Rock notes in her “Big-D” podcast, that
An administrator who desires to implement a SWPBIS framework should understand the commitment involved. Dr. Marcia Rock explains in her “Big D” podcast that “at least 6-12 months of planning need to take place before launching a School-Wide PBS program. Schools who try to do it more quickly often fail because they haven’t devoted enough time to thinking through all aspects of the program.” Moreover, Dr. George Sugai in a video segment of “School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Reaching All Students” said schools should “commit to [the] long term [because] organizations take 2-3 years to change”. After stressing the commitment required, there is a list of steps in Chapter 2 of the Kerr and Nelson textbook to follow in order to implement a PBIS …show more content…
In the “PBIS High School Video Overview” one teacher states, “the thing I like about PBIS structure is that you are not just going on feelings and what we think people feel like and what we think students feel like and what we think teachers want. Everything is data driven.” Internet resources reveal more testimonies from schools that have implemented these practices with successful outcomes, but School Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) is not just a theory or fad based on feelings or opinions. This approach has been studied for several years and there are evidences to support the effects. In Chapter 2 of the Kerr and Nelson textbook, evidences supporting the interventions at the primary tier include “improved student academic and social behavior”, “reductions in major and minor problem behaviors ….in preschool, elementary, middle, and high school settings”, “administrator time was saved”, and “instructional time was gained by students.” Within the secondary tier, the three interventions of social skills training, mentoring, and a CICO program were supported by empirical studies. These practices revealed promising results with it being noted that the CICO programs were not effective for some participating students. A mentoring program may be more effective for high schoolers who are less responsive to social skills training or the CICO plan. Research at the tertiary tier supports function-based interventions. Dr. Marcia Rock notes in her “Big-D” podcast, that