Would you rather eat school lunches or home lunches? Well in my opinion you should bring lunches from home. The question “Why?” might be asked. First school lunches are way to expensive, and kids don’t eat them. Parents rights also get taken away of packing their child's lunches. Furthermore the kids buying school lunches don’t have enough time to eat. I think there should be NO more school lunches.
First school lunches are way to expensive plus kids don’t eat them. One thing that Bradley Brown said in the text Chicago school bans home lunches Ok or Outrageous? is “I couldn’t afford spending $5 a day on lunches for two kids.” One final thing that Bradly Brown said was”I don’t need them eating junk or throwing away food i was forced to pay a lot because they do not like it.” This shows that parents are getting upset that they are forced to pay so much money and their kids don’t even like …show more content…
One thing that a parent said was “Parent’s should have the right to sed their own lunches even if they are not healthy, are they going to come into your house and see what you eat for dinner too.” Another thing that Bradley Brown said was” the purpose of school is to educate my kids not make their nutritional food choices for them.” Also I think parents have the right to pake their kids food because they may have allergies and they can pake stuff that they are not allergic to. This proves schools are taking away PARENT RIGHTS.
Moreover, kids buying school lunches don’t have enough time to get through the lunch line and still have time to eat. Usually the school lunch period is 20-25 minutes. Something that the text Chicago bans home lunches Ok or Outrageous? Is “ That is not enough time for ALL the kids to get their lunchs sit down and eat it.” In my opion their should be 2 or 3 lunch lines so that all kids will get their lunchs and have time to eat it. Now do you see kids DON’T have enough time to
First school lunches are way to expensive plus kids don’t eat them. One thing that Bradley Brown said in the text Chicago school bans home lunches Ok or Outrageous? is “I couldn’t afford spending $5 a day on lunches for two kids.” One final thing that Bradly Brown said was”I don’t need them eating junk or throwing away food i was forced to pay a lot because they do not like it.” This shows that parents are getting upset that they are forced to pay so much money and their kids don’t even like …show more content…
One thing that a parent said was “Parent’s should have the right to sed their own lunches even if they are not healthy, are they going to come into your house and see what you eat for dinner too.” Another thing that Bradley Brown said was” the purpose of school is to educate my kids not make their nutritional food choices for them.” Also I think parents have the right to pake their kids food because they may have allergies and they can pake stuff that they are not allergic to. This proves schools are taking away PARENT RIGHTS.
Moreover, kids buying school lunches don’t have enough time to get through the lunch line and still have time to eat. Usually the school lunch period is 20-25 minutes. Something that the text Chicago bans home lunches Ok or Outrageous? Is “ That is not enough time for ALL the kids to get their lunchs sit down and eat it.” In my opion their should be 2 or 3 lunch lines so that all kids will get their lunchs and have time to eat it. Now do you see kids DON’T have enough time to