Scalia's Concise Analysis

Improved Essays
The major points are the nature of sports and government interference. Justices began their objections by rejecting a false evidence of the majority. Meaning, now here is it written in the PGA Tour policy that golf must be classic or essential golf. Another important factor is why the PGA Tour cannot; promote a new game, with individual rules, like the American League that promotes a game of baseball, which the pitcher’s turn at the plate can be given to a designated hitter? Furthermore their main focus of the rule of law and the importance of creating clear legal rules is the difference of some of the more flexible methods other justices favored. According to Coursehero, even in Scalia’s concise explanation of the private activity of sports

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lopez (1975) Justice Powell commented, “As it is difficult to think of any less consequential infringement than suspension of a junior high school student for a single day, it is equally difficult to perceive any principled limit to the new reach of procedural due process.” Schools and athletic administrators would be wise to consider this comment and recognize that it is a still-developing area of law, with consequences that are not always predictable. Therefore, it is prudent for them to develop rigorous policies and procedures to protect themselves and coaches, in the event that a property or liberty interest is…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California Cyrobank case is one of the strangest cases I have ever heard. To me, it shows how important the role of sports in society is that some people would be willing to pay the outrageous money so that their kid could be “tall and coordinated”, let’s say. As CEO Gary Weinhouse says, “ Parents don’t want their child to be picked on, they want him or her to make the team and not have to sit on the bench”. 3.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most famous court case to arise and question the constitutionality of the internment camps were the trial of Korematsu v. United States. Korematsu defying the evacuation order to stay with his Italian girlfriend was arrested as a felon. He challenged his arrest by appealing the case to the Supreme Court argued that the Executive Order 9066 was a violation of the fourteenth amendment, guarantee of equal protection, and the fifth amendment, the right of due process. However, it was ruled constitutional due to military necessity, that government even has the right to discriminate for the nation’s security. Keep in mind the context that the Brown v. The Board of Education was non-existent and segregation was deeply a part of the American culture,…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scalia, on the other hand, is inclined to avoid using the tools of purpose and consequence because he believes they create subjectivity. Scalia also makes the argument that the meaning of the Constitution is not supposed to change generation to generation and that the open language of the Constitution is there for the legislative branch to create law, not for SCOTUS justices to make up their own laws based on the text. In the interview, Scalia argues against the Developmentalist approach. He even goes so far as to criticize it by comparing the Constitution to an empty bottle where each generation pours the liquid of its choice into it. Basically, Scalia’s argument centers around his belief that the Developmentalist approach results in judges reflecting their own morals their decision instead of remaining objective and sticking to what the text says.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sonia Sotomayor's Analysis

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In her memoir, Sonia Sotomayor expresses the emotional and commemorate events from her childhood through adult life that helped her become the persevered and intelligent woman she is today. At the age of eight, she was diagnosed with type one diabetes, which implicated that she had to learn over her childhood how to apply her insulin shots on her own. The parents were always arguing because the father was an unreliable alcoholic, and the mother a nurse who worked long hours. To avoid conflict between the parents, Sonia did the insulin shots by herself. At first, she didn’t understand the extremities and precautions of the disease and the reason why the family was so worried about her.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brandon Henderson Professor Dr. Edoh Agbehonou Pols 1101 17 April 2015 The decision between Marbury v. Madison was made under judicial review and is considerably the most important decision in the history of the United States, judicial review is when the doctrine of legislative and executive actions are under review. This case gave the supreme says “The government of the united states is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written” (5 U.S 137). Court the power to limit congressional power.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many court cases are beginning to arise due to former players realizing the NCAA unfair rules and guidelines, and it needs to be changed drastically. Two students on the Northwestern football team created a petition to be able to unionize and be compensated for their play, however, the National Labor Relation Board declined to give jurisdiction in the athletes’ case (Strauss) (this is another work from the same author). Although the board denied compensation for athletes, their reasoning was that college athletes are students first. They avoided the main point of the case which was William Goud, a former labor board chairman, thinks the student athletes have a good case by stating "The principle reason for that is their work -- they have…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When justices on the bench of the United States Supreme Court make their respective decisions on a case, they are faced with two outcomes. The first is that they can decide to overturn a decision from a lower court, deem a federal law unconstitutional, or nullify other federal or state statute. When the Supreme Court changes previous statute or overturns a previous court decision, it is judicial activism. But when the Supreme Court decides to uphold precedent, upholding laws passed by Congress or state legislatures, or strictly adhering to the original text of the Constitution, it is judicial restraint. Although the aforementioned terms do not have any overlap in their definitions, it can often be seen that both of these judicial practices can be implemented in a single Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In terms of internal reforms, the NCAA now allows universities to offer unlimited meals and snacks to their athletes, and also provide additional benefits to scholarship athletes (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015, p. 133). There have also been proposals to allow multiyear scholarships, and to also support athletes who want to further their education after their eligibility expires (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015, p. 133). Regarding lawsuits, the authors discuss the O’Bannon v. NCAA case, the collective bargaining case by Northwestern University athletes, and the collection of similar cases that seek to attack the ceiling on grant-in-aid (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015, p. 134). To conclude the article, Sanderson and Siegfried express their expectation regarding what will happen to collegiate athletics. They state that they expect an evolution in the labor market that will reduce, and even potentially eliminate the monopsony power of the NCAA, collegiate sports teams, and conferences (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015,…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays