In any case, he apprehends the acclaim as being directed towards him. In the instance of such acclaim, the Other is recognizing him as the source of inspiration insofar as their acclaim is a result of being moved by the achievements of the modest man. They will say ‘your art moves me’, or they will tell the modest man ‘you have outdone yourself’, or ‘you ought to consider yourself a hero’. But nevertheless, the modest man tells the person offering their praise that ‘it was nothing’, it ‘could have been any other person’, that he was ‘in the right place at the right time’, or he was ‘just doing what he was supposed to do’; what is the modest man doing in this reply? In what ways is he attempting to escape from the anguish of his inalienable freedom? In what ways is this demonstrative of bad faith? These questions will guide my following
In any case, he apprehends the acclaim as being directed towards him. In the instance of such acclaim, the Other is recognizing him as the source of inspiration insofar as their acclaim is a result of being moved by the achievements of the modest man. They will say ‘your art moves me’, or they will tell the modest man ‘you have outdone yourself’, or ‘you ought to consider yourself a hero’. But nevertheless, the modest man tells the person offering their praise that ‘it was nothing’, it ‘could have been any other person’, that he was ‘in the right place at the right time’, or he was ‘just doing what he was supposed to do’; what is the modest man doing in this reply? In what ways is he attempting to escape from the anguish of his inalienable freedom? In what ways is this demonstrative of bad faith? These questions will guide my following