The San Joaquin River Restoration Project is a yes, restoration of the river! The article “River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkling of Hope” is an article written by Daniel Weintraub supporting this restoration for the river. This article was featured in The Sacramento Bee newspaper. It was published April 26th, 2009. Sacramento's people are known for being big with politics and business. Weintraub is a writer for multiple pages and has had fifteen years of experience. The restoration for this river should be seen as a positive outlook as Weintraub sees it. Biologists stating information, giving hope for this river, and professional facts on why this river will be useful are all reasons on why the restoration should take place.
A positive outlook on this project can consist of many things. A biologist by the name Monty Schmitt states facts also supporting the River Rights Project. “ ‘When we're done, we'll have a river that can safely convey the flows necessary to restore salmon and other native fish to the river’ ” says Monty (Weintraub 3). With this example of ethos, the use of credibility, the author is showing how he is credible by stating a fact that a scientist has made. He is also showing the reader he is not the only …show more content…
The restoration was a multi-billion dollar project to bring back the salmon. This program met the goal of doing the project, but spent way more than expected. As so, the project came up as a disappointment. After the research I took the time to look upon, my argument has changed about this restoration. It was a complete waste of time and money. In early 2015, it was found that the San Joaquin River is coming into to a drought. This river left communities vulnerable, and in face of many more droughts. Eventually it was spoken that this water would hit the pacific ocean, leaving all that was worked for with
A positive outlook on this project can consist of many things. A biologist by the name Monty Schmitt states facts also supporting the River Rights Project. “ ‘When we're done, we'll have a river that can safely convey the flows necessary to restore salmon and other native fish to the river’ ” says Monty (Weintraub 3). With this example of ethos, the use of credibility, the author is showing how he is credible by stating a fact that a scientist has made. He is also showing the reader he is not the only …show more content…
The restoration was a multi-billion dollar project to bring back the salmon. This program met the goal of doing the project, but spent way more than expected. As so, the project came up as a disappointment. After the research I took the time to look upon, my argument has changed about this restoration. It was a complete waste of time and money. In early 2015, it was found that the San Joaquin River is coming into to a drought. This river left communities vulnerable, and in face of many more droughts. Eventually it was spoken that this water would hit the pacific ocean, leaving all that was worked for with