The downstream of San Andreas would be an example of an individual action that involves in a nuclear power plant, meaning that the government considers of rebuilding the nuclear power plant in California. On the other hands, the upstream of the San Andreas would be if the government aims to change it to our sources were not required to use enormous power and massive capacity. For the most part, the movie shows some occasions that observe the earthquake through evidence and reason. This could have been argued for our awareness and concern for the environmental, making a change the way we do politics and states that humans are the key concept of changing the way we understand nature. Throughout this film, the post-apocalyptic disaster such as the earthquake and tsunami features our environmental disaster perspective and certainly, the movie focuses on thinking about the futures that can imply an act of imagination. The representation in this movie is mediated meaning that it offers one view of nature and society (Yusoff, 2018). Accordingly, San Andreas presents the future indexes include disasters, catastrophic events and provide us some time to think about disaster management, vulnerability and risk (Yusoff, 2018). As a result, San Andreas purports the …show more content…
Crucially, the film exaggerates the apocalyptic phenomenon, as the earthquake hits California and the tsunami destroys the whole city. My final argument on San Andreas film is to redefine a key concept of the environmental disaster by showing a prediction for our future, post-apocalypse. By all accounts, San Andreas is not a real earthquake in California and it will not happen in the future as extreme as those in the movie, however the film points out that the earthquake is likely to occur on the San Andreas or any other major faults around the world at any