Samuel Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia

Superior Essays
Should people be forced to stay alive? Imagine having an incurable disease and having to live through all the suffering and pain from it. One could argue that ending the life would be easier and pain free. The idea of life is so immense that it can’t be subjected to a single concept. The arguments were proposed for and against euthanasia in the 19th century. The same arguments still exist on the subject, mainly on morality. Now it’s for the general public to decide where they stand on euthanasia. Euthanasia should be implemented on cases that require its necessity.
In 1870, Samuel Williams first proposed using anesthetics and morphine to intentionally end a patient's life. Over the next 35 years, debates about the ethics of euthanasia raged in the
…show more content…
Pain shows essence of a person and eventually defeats their strong will. A person at pain wishes to end it rather than face it. One might say that it would be easier to die than living in constant pain. But, such intention can’t be taken into serious consideration. For euthanasia to be considered, written petition is necessity. Such petitions might be contradicted with the arguments of sanity of the victim, whether a person is in a right state of mind to make such type of request. A Canadian woman, Sue Rodriguez, suffered from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that was denied with the grant of assisted death. She petitioned the Canadian Supreme Court for help to die if her life was intolerable, and she would be unable to kill herself without help. Her appeal was made under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but it was turned down by a narrow margin. In the end Mrs. Rodriguez did get help to commit suicide but by a good friend who was willing to risk criminal charge, and who administered the lethal injection( Warnock and Macdonald,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia: An Annotated Bibliography Keown, John. " Voluntary Euthanasia and Physicianassisted Suicide: Should the WMA Drop Its Opposition?. " World Medical Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 103-107.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alternatives to euthanasia can prevent putting too much power in other hands, and eliminate consequences in the future; therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized. Through the legalization of Euthanasia we will eventually enter a “slippery slope”. One of the biggest concerns with euthanasia is when to cross the line at who can receive euthanasia. As euthanasia progresses more laws and rules are being set to allow more people to receive euthanasia.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My opposition to euthanasia being considered a medical treatment is the understanding that the intent of the physician should never be to kill, it ought to always be healing or curing a patient. However, there are cases where neither is possible and with the legalization of euthanasia, patients have a right to not suffer unnecessary pain and elect to die. In such cases, the aim should be to relieve the patient’s suffering, to do what is in the best interest of the patient, and respects the patient’s…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I deduce from Gay-Williams that the standard arguments against euthanasia are worthless, While I cannot say that his arguments do not have some power, he does not convince me that euthanasia is altogether and inherently wrong in any and every…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although some experts argue euthanasia is legalized murder, I suggest this is not true because doctors ask permission to take the life of the individual that has been suffering for a long period of time. But the medical field keeps changing and many new cures are coming to sight. I will examine the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia has first been introduced during the time period of the Ancient Greeks and Ancient Romans. Many physicians have supported the thought of a quick and easy death instead of having the patient suffer an illness. Although physicians in this time period are supposed to follow the Hippocratic Oath,- an oath written by Hippocrates to treat the ill to the best of their ability, to give a patient their privacy, to teach their secrets of medicine to the future generations, and to forbid from giving out any type of deadly medicine to anyone even when asked- only a few physicians have tended to follow this oath while others respected the patient’s orders, and have given them the medicine that they have requested. Many countries in the past…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main argument about physician aid in dying and Euthanasia is whether or not it is ethical and whether or not it should be legal everywhere. However, the decision is the patient’s to make. The controversial topic of Physician Assisted Suicide is well known in the United States, and many people have found conflict in this practice because it breaks some religious values. The legalization of this practice, however is slowly progressing all over the world.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Dying With Dignity

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pro Dying with Dignity In the United States, we are given the ability to choose our life experiences. However, in most states we are not allowed the choice to die peacefully or painfully. In the United States, there are people who face an unbearable suffering prior to their own death. These people are forced to suffer from mental and physical pain, knowing that there is no cure to save them.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide There is one thing that you can be certain of your entire life; you are going to die. We had no choice to be born, so should we have no choice when we die? Oftentimes we do not even know when we are going to die, in instances such as car accidents or murders. Sometimes we do know, and the death process can be long and drawn out, with pain, suffering, and mountains of medical bills.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The constant debate on the legality of assisted suicide has been at large for many decades, this procedure has benefits to the patients and to the family of said patient, but with the benefits also comes the downfalls to a procedure as delicate as physician assisted suicide. Proponents of physician assisted death argue mercy killings are justified, especially for patients with terminal illnesses along with uncontrollable pain. They argue the patient has a right to permanent relief by physician assisted death. However, the opposition argues, with appropriate pain management the terminally ill patient should die naturally.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite being controversial, majority of people that choose to die assisted by physician are suffered from terminal diseases. Some supporters believe that people should have the right to choose what they want because of freewill. Others argue that it’s immoral to end people’s life in an unnatural way and it’s also bring…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays