1. Sam’s conclusion it seems to be valid. In other words, Sam’s response is based on his own critical thinking. Sam’s claims that the new Islamic generations do not do crazy things like the old generations used to do.
2. William claims that, that a peaceful religion does not kill people. On the other hand, Sam states that what William says its foster hate. William claims that he doesn’t hate Muslims; he just says that Muslim religion teaches people to do bad things. William’s and Sam’s reasoning about religion are different opinions. Sam is defending Muslim religion by being peaceful. At the same time, William is opposite about being a peaceful religion as Christianity is.
3. What happened in Taliban in 213 it is heartbreaking.