Bishop Harry Jackson said in an article published by CNN that the bible supports heterosexual marriage, and “there is little need for us to go through an exhaustive definition of biblical marriage versus the types of unions allowed by law today” (Jackson) .Critics disapprove any marriage union and furthermore adoptions. Furthermore, they claim that redefining marriage will only bring negative consequences and weaken the faith and church over time (Newsroom).Conservatives imply that marriage should be considered as traditionally between the union of a woman and men.
Advocates, however, challenge religious conservatives because they also claim that divorce, cohabitation, and no marital childbearing are also sins that degenerate moral and religious views. Conservatives argue against same-sex marriage and adoptions as well as unwed women having children because the both attempts against morality values. Advocates claim that the conservative’s ideas are radical with no flexibility to change, although society is always …show more content…
However, conservatives neglect the idea of adoption for SSM couples. Besides same-sex couples, women and men often have sterile problems and using adoption can form a family. Some agencies allow LGTB individuals to adopt children but they do not allow the couples to do. They deprive one of the parent from parenthood privileges.
Same-sex marriage and adoption advocates such as the American Academy of Pediatrics’ research claim that there is no correlation or effect caused by the parent’s orientation on the child’s mental health. Furthermore, the argue that the factors that affect the children development are such as economic and social stability, their community and toxic social environments of children exposed to, such as violence (AAP). Advocates explain that children growing in same-sex marriage couples, houses are more open about their sexuality since they feel less parental pressure about