Same-Sex Marriage In The Case Of Obergefell V. Hodges

Superior Essays
Same-sex marriage is an important issue that have been a central point in modern society. Certainly, the importance of this issues should be decided on the foundation of civil freedom and civil rights. The recognition of the legitimate rights of same-sex married couples should be acknowledged and protected under the law. Thus, rejecting same-sex couples, the legal rights to get married is the despicable indecency denying human rights to lively freely. “Gay marriage is really a matter of respect and human rights Across the world, gays are subjected to violence simply because they are gay, and the United Nations Human Rights Council has recently condemned this violence. But it is not just violence that violates the human rights of gays; a similar …show more content…
One of these evident and most significant same-sex marriage cases is Obergefell v. Hodges. On June 26, 2015, the triumph of the Obergefell v. Hodges finally recognized same-sex couples the right to legally marry in the all 50 states. In the long era battle of the gay movement, this is defiantly one of the dynamic victory for the gay community. The case of Obergefell v. Hodges was brought to the United States Supreme Court, in which states refusal to legally recognize same-sex marriage. In fact, the United States Court claims the state’s bans on same-sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriage performed in other states did not violate the couples’ Fourteenth Amendment rights to Equal protection and Due process. (Oyez) Therefore, violated equal rights, and violations of Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. As the plaintiffs Obergefell, sued the State of Ohio for not acknowledging his marriage to his partner Arthur, who passed away due to ALS. Ultimately, the decision of the outcome of the case was 5-4 decision, resulting in favor of the plaintiffs that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, the United States Courts accepted the recognition of same-sex

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cornell University. ] The case was first granted by the Supreme Court on January 16, 2015; Argued starting April 28,anything else. 2015; and decided June 26, 2015. The decision fell in favour for Obergefell with a 5 to 4 decision by the Supreme Court. In the article cited, it is stated that, “Because there are no differences between a same-sex union and an opposite-sex union with respect to these principles [building a home and raising children] the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” [ Obergefell…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social/Policy Implications: The Obergefell v. Hodges case is one of the most controversial. As is the case with all issues, there are at least two sides. This is no different as the Supreme Court received praise and applause for breaking a social barrier. They also received criticism for straying from tradition and supporting an undesirable group of people.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The big, broadly stated issue is: Does the Constitution (and/or its Amendments) require States to treat same sex marriages on the same terms and conditions as marriages between persons of opposite sex? Facts of the case. His case concerned three fact scenarios with three different couples consolidated to answer the same legal issues. The first couple was a same sex male couple from Ohio who were together over 20 years. After one developed a debilitating disease, they decided to marry in Maryland,…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has gained a tremendous amount of power since the states first approved of the rights and limitations set forth for it in Article III during the Constitutional ratification process. Some of this accumulated power, such as the ability to analyze the constitutionality of Congressional legislation, appears to be justifiable in most cases. However, there have been several instances, especially the recent Obergefell v. Hodges case, where the Court has seemed to overstep its boundaries by a considerable margin. The problem is that the extent of the Court’s power depends on the interpretation of its authority as stated in the Constitution, and the Court itself has been granted the primary right to Constitutional interpretation. As…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-Sex Marriage in New York "Who would give a law to lovers? Love is unto itself a higher law" ("Boethius"), a quote stated by a Roman philosopher Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius in 524 (Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius - Biography). Obviously, laws have nothing to do to interfere the love in theory; however, as the discrimination that homosexual people receive for a long period, people in New York has to fight for their equal right to have the law and live under the protection of it. Just like Boethius states, it is ironic that love have to be approved. No body could judge love; ridiculously, almost everybody gives discrimination to unusual love.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision can count as a satisfactory point in which the law to discuss became into being. While the history goes back much farther in this case, prior to 1991, the final decision by the court begins in 1993, where they found it unconstitutional for the state of Hawaii to deny same-sex couples the right to marry (Baehr v. Lewin, 1993). In this instance, the Hawaii Supreme Court relied on a perspective of equal protection, rather than due process, to justify their decision in this matter. Shortly thereafter, the case is remanded to the trial court, to allow the state time and an opportunity to establish its reasons as to why they can deny same-sex couples marriage licenses, which the state delayed until 1996…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The defendants, in one final bid for the outlawing of gay marriage, stated that allowing homosexual marriage would “sever the connection between natural procreation and marriages” (Obergefell v. Hodges 26). By saying this, the defendants are distinctly stating that marriage is only for procreation and those who ultimately end up getting married, homosexual or heterosexual, are only doing it to have children and procreate. The same defendants also argued that legalizing same-sex marriage would harm marriage by leading to fewer heterosexual marriages (Obergefell v. Hodges 26). These anti-gay rights defendants had no statistical fact off of which this statement was based. After careful evaluation of both the plaintiff’s and defendant 's’ arguments, five out of nine supreme court justices voted in favor of the plaintiff, giving him the majority vote (“Facts of the Case”).…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court practiced the use of the supremacy clause by over riding states laws and establishing a law for all the land of gay marriage being legal. No matter what laws states had prior to this regarding marriage became irrelevant because of this new law from the Supreme Court. Gay marriage has always been extremely controversial in the United States. Everyone seems to have a view on it that stems from their religion or personal…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination. Works Cited Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the past few years the acceptance of same sex marriage has been experiencing vast amounts of growth. Individuals nowadays are more accepting of same sex couples being given the right to marriage than they ever have been before. On June 26 of 2015 the Supreme Court declared that states’ banning of same sex marriage was unconstitutional. In the case Obergefell V. Hodges, the 14th Amendment was challenged by fourteen same sex couples. The couples claimed that the 14th Amendment required all states to accept legitimacy of marriages performed in other states and by not doing so, their rights were being infringed upon.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays