Sam Sheppard Case Study

Decent Essays
1. The two fundamental constitutional rights that were in conflict with this case is Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and First Amendment (freedom of expression). Sam Sheppard had to deal with constant scruinty from media coverage throughout his trial in the murder of his wife.
2. Sheppard argued that he was entitled to be released from prison because there was a carnival atmosphere at Sheppard’s trial. Sheppard was at total disadvantage from the massive pretrial publicity. Sheppard was ordered to be released from custody unless the state tries him within a reasonable time.\
3. Sheppard argue that he did not receive a fair trial because the trial judge failed to protect him sufficiently form the massive, pervasive and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution.
4.
…show more content…
Sheppard was able to point out discrepancies in his statements to authorities. There were articles that were published that stressed his infidelities and affairs outside of his marriage as a motive for a crime. In a trial testimony there was only one who came forth not the numerous affairs newspapers suggested.
5. Politics definitely had a influence in Sheppard’s trial because the trial occurred two weeks before the November election which the chief prosecutor who was a candidate for common pleas judge and the trial judge at the time was a candidate for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first major issue that was identified by the public defender was the interrogation of Brenden Butler without his parent being present or having a lawyer present by his side during his interrogation by a detective. The…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Eddie Lloyd Wrong

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As is commonly known, a portion of today’s trials that take place are accusing the wrong person. But how long has this been a problem? There have been multiple trials in the past that have had the same thing occur, and many individuals are tried for crimes they did not commit. A large portion of those people are even found guilty and wrongfully thrown in jail. Unfortunately, Eddie Joe Lloyd was one of those people.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case R v. Keegstra, the fundamental right to freedom of expression was used as a defence by Keegstra, who was charged under the criminal code for promoting hate speech (R v. Keegstra, 1990). Although the defence used was a constitutional and fundamental right, the Supreme Court found that the violation of a fundamental right by the criminal code was justifiable. The court ruled that section 319(2) of the criminal code was constitutional as the criminal code serves legitimate social purposes and aims to protect important social values; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada sustained collective good and public order. (Jones, 2015:…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living the life of the rich and famous may not be as great as it seems. In fact, it could be deadly. For instance, the Borden family lived an extravagant life and seemed to have it all, but it all was taken away from them on August 1892. Although the case remains unsolved, evidence and research leads to a clear killer, Lizzie Borden. Andrew Borden and Lizzie’s stepmother, and Abby Borden were brutally murdered on August 4, 1892.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Gideon's Trumpet

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gideon’s Trumpet In 1961, a case appeared to the United States Supreme Court that challenged a well-accepted precedent established by the court almost 20 years prior. The case being discussed in this book is Gideon vs Wainwright, in which the defendant is a fifty-one-year-old white man in Florida. Gideon was accused of petty larceny, and eventually found guilty in court. Gideon, though, was representing himself, as he could not afford an attorney and was never provided with one.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chapter Four, Show Trial, of Amy Bach’s Ordinary Injustice depicts a case of wrongful conviction that occurred over twenty years ago. Michael Evans and Paul Terry, both ages seventeen, had been charged with raping and murdering nine-year-old Lisa Cabassa. The crime occurred the evening of January 14, 1976, when Lisa and her eleven year old brother Ricky were walking to a friend’s house and got separated. Later when Ricky returned home he and his family realized Lisa never made it home. The only witness to Lisa’s abduction was Judy Januszewski, who didn’t come forward until days later.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Politics of Negotiating Public Tragedy: Media Framing of the Matthew Shepard Murder,” authors Brian L. Ott and Eric Aoki analyze the Matthew Shepard case, discussing how the media was able to alleviate the blame from the public surrounding the case and clear the public of any guilt. Additionally, the pair address the stigmatization of the LGBTQ+ community, and how this stigmatization delays efforts to prevent similar situations. Within the article, the authors provide insight that is surprising, puzzling, useful, new, and interesting. Within the article, Ott and Aoki discuss how the narrative of the story was shifted to relieve the public of any guilt or blame and isolate the pair responsible for the murder of Matthew Shepard, Aaron…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Field Case Analysis

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case a man named Abel Fields falsely said that he worked in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had earned a purple heart which you only earn if are wounded in battle. This man never served in the military so everything he said was false. He was making these claims in a public safety meeting, he told the public that they should listen to him because of his experience.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SCOTUS cases involving the First Amendment are important to learn about about because they can and will influence how the First Amendment is applied to all citizens. The First Amendment grants everyone the freedom to express their own religious…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All across the United States and all throughout history our judicial system has been terrible. Trials that stand out are very similar, they don’t have reasonable doubt, they all have a bias against the defendant to begin with, and the judicial system doesn’t want to look bad. The witch trials are a great example and one of the oldest to happen in the colonial era, but it was still in America. The West Memphis three is another great example of the judicial system being corrupt. Even though these trials were hundreds of years apart, they are very similar.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ben Pollizi Mrs. Kimmich English 10 Advanced 15 April 2017 Sacco and Vanzetti Shortly after World War 1, the United States was soon gripped with a massive fear of communists, foreigners, and anything that wasn’t American. This fear was taken out on anyone who was in America that wasn’t American. One key example of this was the lives of Sacco and Vanzetti. These two men moved to America before World War 1 had begun. Due to the fact that Sacco and Vanzetti were both Italian immigrants, and were convicted of their crime during a time of massive hatred toward foreigners, the justice system disregarded all the reasonable doubt in their case and declared them guilty.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The O.J. Simpson Trial: How the Media and Race Influenced the Decision The legal decision of The People versus O.J. Simpson forever changed legal proceedings in our country, and is regarded as one of the most controversial court rulings in American history. The murder trial was unique due to the high profile status of the people involved, the circumstances surrounding the crime, and the media attention that the case received from the media. The crime occurred in 1994 Los Angeles, a racially charged area of the country still feeling the wounds of the Rodney King incident. Due to the conditions of the crime, as well as the personal history of many of the officials involved, a lot of the American public felt that O.J. Simpson was an African-American…

    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays