Sam Houston's Heroic Decisions

Improved Essays
“A hero is someone who has given his or her life to something bigger than oneself.” In the thirty years Sam Houston lived in texas he had to make many decisions that would affect him in many ways. Houston often had to make many unpopular decisions. What was Sam Houston’s most heroic decision. Houston's most heroic decision was the trying to convince General Smith to retreat his army from the Alamo.

In 1836 Houston was at the Alamo with his troops. Houston had good judgement and he knew the Mexican would have many more troops compared to the Texas army. He sent a letter to General Smith stating that the Alamo should be demolished and the troops must leave. General Smith said no and he said he would stay and fight. Houston showed his good judgement by telling the general that the Mexican Army would have to many troops and the Texan Army wouldn’t be able to fight back, but he also showed concern for others because he cared about the troops and he wanted to keep them safe. It was heroic of him to care for the troops and his good judgement about the Mexican Army would have been helpful if the General Smith had listened to him, but it was also heroic that he at least tried to convince Smith. This why this is Sam’s
…show more content…
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 revoked the Missouri Compromise and gave people in western territories the ability to adopt slavery. The choice of adopting slavery was very popular. Sam was one of only two senators who voted against slavery. He warned that is would lead to warn and one would have a victory and the other go down in a sea of blood and smoking ruin. Lawyer the Texas Senators voted to condemn Houston’s position. Houston integrity because although everyone thought that slavery was a good choice, Houston knew it wasn’t right. He also showed his concern for others because he didn’t want the slaves to be forced to work and not have the freedom or equal

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Alamo Battle Analysis

    • 2598 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Battle of the Alamo was a significant turning point in the war for Texas Independence. This battlefield analysis will briefly explore the reasons behind why the battle took place, the strategic significance of the Alamo, who the participants were on both sides, what actions took place, and the failures that occurred both strategic and tactically. We will present an alternate outcome of this battle and explore what may have happened if the Texan defenders would have won the battle. The failure of the Texans to defend the Alamo concentrated around their lack of accurate and timely intelligence collection, the non-reporting of actionable intelligence as it pertained to the enemy’s composition and courses of action, and failure of higher command to supply the outpost with proper logistic support.…

    • 2598 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, Stephen Douglas offered popular sovereignty, making people decide whether to have their territory slave free or not. This act terminated the Missouri Compromise. In addition, to this in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act repealed the Missouri Compromise as Senator Steven Douglas stated in the act that popular sovereignty would determine if slavery should or should not exist in these territories, while the Missouri Compromise stated that there shall be no slavery passed the 36°30’ line. There were numerous political and social effects this act had on the nation. A major effect would be the increased infuriation of the North from the repeal of the once thought “long-standing” Missouri Compromise. This infuriation led the North to distrust the South and also opened their eyes to what they believed was a Southern obsession with the expansion of slavery. The North would become less lenient to the idea of slavery.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was devised as a compromise over slavery in 1854, as the nation was beginning to be torn apart in the decade before the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Randolph B. Campbell argues that Sam Houston was a great leader but with a subpar personal life for most of it. The four major moments one should pay attention to when discussing Houston’s time of leadership, are his time governing Tennessee, leading an army during the war for Texas independence, his time running Texas and lastly, his time as a member of the Senate for the state of Texas. Houston made decisions based on what he feels is the best for his people in the long run.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Civil war was a battle fought between the United and Confederate states of America, launching in 1861. The Civil war initiated, due to the country not being able to come to a compromise on the issue of slavery, and politics. The Civil war is one of the most unique wars in the history of America. Some historians believe the war could be prevented while others believe it was bound to happen. However, I feel that in many cases the Civil war could have been avoided, but the ways things were being handled in the country it was destined to happen.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American soldier William Barret Travis instructs in his letter “Commandancy of the Alamo” that Texans – and all Americans – should fight for their independence from Mexicans to…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others believed that the Mexican government was to blame for viewing the people of Texas as of little importance. In fact there were a number of factors that led to the revolution. Probably the greatest cause of the Texas…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleuthing The Alamo In the Rhetorical analysis, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp dives head long into an extensive evaluation of the events, people, and historical stories of the Alamo. As he began his research he stumbled across a speech written and given by Sam Houston. Houston is a well acknowled man in both Texas and U. S. history with a reputation for fairness, and being and all around good wholesome man with a polished set or morals. Upon reading a statement Houston made to his men Crisp felt as if something were wrong.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays