Sam Houston Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
The author of this primary source is Sam Houston. As the governor of Texas in the year of 1860, Houston was a participant in this case as he was delivering a speech. The speech given addressed slavery in Texas and secession in the era leading to the start of the Civil War. In this speech, it is evident that Houston’s race, economic status, as well as personal background had an effect on his opinion regarding the subject at hand. Houston was a white man who was an unregretful slave owner, and with that it is important to considered upon analyzing this primary source. It is also important to consider that Houston was a war veteran, having served in the War of 1812, Creek War, Battle of Horseshoe Bend, the Texas Revolution, as well as the Battle …show more content…
He was attempting to hold together the union through his stance as he sensed an impeding civil war, as he mentioned several times. Houston displayed through this speech that he was highly opposed to the secession of Texas from the union, but that he was not against slavery. From Sam Houston’s beginning as the governor of Texas in 1859, he was campaigning against secessionists (History.com Staff). From this it is evident that he believed this was not the solution to the rising issue regarding the institution of slavery in the United States. Houston believed that secession would only cause disaster in the United States and that this would not favor the proslavery argument (McClarey). Although he opposed the idea, with the popular vote there would be no other option in place. Though it seemed a hopeless argument with most supporting the idea, Houston attempted to persuade the citizens while he still could as he did not want to see Texas lead into a civil war. Houston stated “To secede from the Union and set up another government would cause war. If you go to war with the United States, you will never conquer her, as she has the money and the men. If she does not whip you by guns, powder, and steel, she will starve you to death. It will take the flower of the country-the young men” (Houston). One can infer from various statements …show more content…
Houston, as a highly experienced war veteran, took the idea of an impending Civil War very seriously as he believed it to be precarious as a result. Not only was this evident through this source, but it was also clear that he simply did not want to see the nation divided. With Houston’s experience as a war veteran, it is important to understand that he did have a biased point of view. Houston did not want to see a nation go into disarray over such an issue, as he fought to preserve it. Sam Houston is also a biased source as a slave owner, as he was widely known to be proslavery and felt it should be maintained in the Texan way of life. These biases do limit this source marginally, but are insignificant in the larger scope of ideas displayed in this address. Houston’s position on slavery was typical of Texans in his era, but his proslavery viewpoint did not correlate with his anti-secessionist point of view. With that, upon analyzing this primary source you must consider the context of the time and understand the popular belief of Texans in this era. Overall, this was a credible primary source with relevant ideas that displayed the Texan sentiment on the issue of slavery and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commissioner of South Carolina, John Smith Preston, believes that “the South cannot exist without slavery…” (Page 72) which is why South Carolina was the first to succeed from the Union. Southerners did not want to put and end to slavery, therefore creating this uprising that influenced many factors such as states rights, the economy, and the state as a whole. With the many states succeeding in effort to dissolve the Union, politics played a big role between the North and the South. Dew realized that time and time again, in all the commissioners’ speeches and letters, slavery was always the main topic brought up along with other brief topics discussed in this book.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only was this a bold move, but also then the confederates took fire on Fort Sumter shortly after. At this point it was confusing in how this much “controversy [could have] swirled” (pg.5) for the conflict to become to this extreme. It doesn’t seem as if it could all come from one cause, which is why he then goes into depth on his experiences and others to help the audience understand the arguments in what caused of the secession and war. Dew follows many secession commissioners their experience, primary documents and speeches to create the research provided in the book to conclude the many causes of the secession. Since the secession lead quickly to many other conflicts, there was sort a domino effect of conclusions in why the uprising and conflict began.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For many Texans kid, including James E. Crisp, Sam Houston might become their childhood idol. The victory that Sam Houston bring for Texas at the Battle of San Jacinto secured the Texas’ independence from Mexico. James E. Crisp, on his book Sleuthing the Alamo is investigating Sam Houston’s speech that he made to the soldiers at the small South Texas settlement called Refugio. Crisp was not investigating Sam Houston’s speech suddenly. Instead, Crisp found out that the content of his speech is the total opposite of what he did in the real life.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moretta writes that “In short, Ballinger shared the hope of many Texas unionists that the Confederacy would be all the things the old Union was, and more. The new nation would protect individual liberties, guarantee law and stability, propagate the original American mission, and do so in harmony with slavery.” Ballinger was a small slave holder before the secessionist movement. This was perhaps based on his belief that African Americans were inferior. According to Moretta, Ballinger believed that African Americans lacked “the faculties of mind, the disposition, the character, to rise much above their present condition”.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Picture this scene. It’s April 14, 1865 at Ford’s Theatre, around 10:00 o’clock at night. The 16th president, Abraham Lincoln lies unconscious on the floor, blood and brain matter gushing out of his head. Crowds of raging, screaming people trying to force their way into the president’s box fill the theater. The play being performed onstage forgotten immediately, the actors taking part in the angry mob.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, a commissioner from Alabama, Leroy Pope Walker described that the Republican rule from the north would cost the southerners, “our property,” and “our liberties. (Dew 52) Perhaps the commissioner who most vividly described the racial fear of the secessionist was Alabama’s Stephen Hale. Hale wrote of the south “facing ‘extermination’”. When he referred to southerners being “degraded to a position of equality with free negroes,” (Dew 52)…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Randolph B. Campbell argues that Sam Houston was a great leader but with a subpar personal life for most of it. The four major moments one should pay attention to when discussing Houston’s time of leadership, are his time governing Tennessee, leading an army during the war for Texas independence, his time running Texas and lastly, his time as a member of the Senate for the state of Texas. Houston made decisions based on what he feels is the best for his people in the long run.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Was Sam Houston’s Most Heroic Decision? Making decisions that citizens of your, country or state may not appreciate, can be impenetrable. Sam Houston was an authoritative hero in Texas history. He reinforced that the Indians should be treated as friends, Texas should not enforce the Missouri Compromise, he also refused to join the Confederacy. These decisions are each very important to Texas History.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Annexation Proposal

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He noted that over many years, Texas residents have maintained their independence and affirmed ?? their desire to become part of the United States (Tyler). In the statement supporting the treaty of annexation, Calhoun et al. emphasized that safety and prosperity for the people of Texas and the United States were key arguments to support adoption. Texans should expect to enjoy the same rights, privileges and immunities of other U.S. citizens after annexation is approved (Calhoun et al. , Article…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleuthing The Alamo In the Rhetorical analysis, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp dives head long into an extensive evaluation of the events, people, and historical stories of the Alamo. As he began his research he stumbled across a speech written and given by Sam Houston. Houston is a well acknowled man in both Texas and U. S. history with a reputation for fairness, and being and all around good wholesome man with a polished set or morals. Upon reading a statement Houston made to his men Crisp felt as if something were wrong.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Slavery Movement Essay

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Proslavery Evolution Slavery was heavily relied on prior to the birth of the United States. The pro-slavery movement skyrocketed after the American Revolution considering many citizens were slavery supporters, simply because slaves were used to support the nation’s agriculture predominantly in the south. Slavery was widespread throughout Virginia and in the southern states. Americans capitalism fundamentally depended on slavery which caused a growth in the slave population. After international slave trade became illegal, the demand for slaves increased rapidly.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Annexation Of Texas Essay

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Annexation of Texas The annexation of Texas by the United States remains a controversial topic to this day. Occurring in 1845, it caused a great uproar amongst the citizens of the United States and Texas. The main question when debating the annexation of Texas is how it affected slavery. Indeed, and because the annexation of slavery served to extend the area in which slavery would be allowed, this caused a situation in which it shifted the balance of power away from the North and towards the South in relation to the question of slavery.…

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Secession

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the past century, states’ rights has become an idea more than an actual right given to the people. The Central Government has gradually gathered more power for itself and, as a consequence, leaving states wanting. In December of 1860, South Carolina tried to solve this problem by seceding from the union. While it would be unfair to say that this caused the civil war, it defiantly was a factor. But since then, the problem has only grown worse.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays