Salinas V. Texas Case Study

Improved Essays
The legal community was surprised and divided by the Court's opinion on Salinas v. Texas case (Colb, 2013). However, most of the legal perceptions were that the case blurred the lines of the Fifth Amendment rights (Donovan, 2014) and (Davis, 2017). In other words, it made many Americans wonder if they had the right to remain silent. As far as the implications go, the most “…important aspect of the case is the diminished protection against self-incrimination for accused criminals." (Davis, 2017). Another serious consequence of this ruling is that it is “…sure to create some confusion.” which can have serious repercussions (Davis, 2017). As a result, the interpretation is subject to a court's opinion.
In my view, I think both the lower court

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    [We] have aptly summarized this quest, based on [the Court of Appeals’] past decisions, as one that requires an examination of the statutory text in context, a review of legislative history to confirm conclusions or resolve questions from that examination, and a consideration of the consequences of alternative readings. “Text is the plain language of the relevant provision, typically given its ordinary meaning, viewed in context, considered in light of the whole statute, and generally evaluated for ambiguity. Legislative purpose, either apparent from the text or gathered from external sources, often informs, if not controls, our reading of the statute. An examination of interpretive consequences, either as a comparison of the results of each proffered construction, or as a principle of avoidance of an absurd or unreasonable reading, grounds the court’s interpretation in reality.” Town of Oxford v. Koste, 204 Md. App. 578, 585–86, 42 A.3d 637 (2012), aff'd, 431 Md. 14, 63 A.3d 582 (2013) (citations…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In case one, State of California vs Turner, Brock Turner, 20-year-old Caucasian male and was a resident in California was charged with rape of three out of five counts in 2015, penal code PC261 (a)(3), PC261 (a)(4), PC220 (a)(1), PC289 (e), PC289 (d) (Official California Legislative Information , 1993). Turner was found guilty in March of three felony charges: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person PC220 (a)(1), penetration of an intoxicated person PC289 (e), and penetration of an unconscious person penal codes PC289 (d) (Court Motions/Orders Instructions/Minutes Chronolocial Order, 2015). None of the codes that he was charged did not include the intent “rape,” which may have led to the lower sentence then the max. So, Turner was sentenced with 6 months in jail instead of the max. The district attorney felt the punishment does not fit the crime (Fantz, 2016).…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    QUESTION PRESENTED 

 Whether Kaleigh Cyprus committed transfer intent with respect to Jack pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-203(B)(1) and State v. Ramirez . The phone was thrown towards another person involve, identified as Helena. In result it ended up hitting Jack BRIEF ANSWER 

 Yes, Kaleigh did commit assault because her intention was to throw the phone to Helena and with respect to Jack, she was not intentionally throwing the phone at him. Since Jack ended up sitting in that location and turning his head it resulted in the phone hitting him.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To: Supervising Attorney From: Heather Wells, Student Date: January 31, 2016 Case: Arturo Garcia v Mary Chavez Re: Child support modification Statement of Assignment: I have been asked to prepare a memorandum for you regarding the following questions a. “Was it permissible for Ms. Chavez to unilaterally reduce support when the oldest child reached the age of majority?” b. “What is the likelihood of the court granting a modification of child support due to Ms. Chavez’s change of occupation? Issue: Under Statutory Laws: a. “NMSA § 28-6-1 (Repl.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CASE BRIEF Case Name – Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 12 (2013) Facts – Genovevo Salinas, the petitioner, who was not in custody or read Miranda warnings, agreed to go to the police station to answer questions regarding involvement in a murder. When petitioner was asked if ballistic testing would match ammunition casings found at the scene, he remained silent. Petitioner contended that the prosecutors’ use of his silence to indicate guilt violated his Fifth Amendment rights. Procedural History – The petitioner was charged in Texas state court with murder.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore Vs Texas Case Study

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Bandy 2A In a recent article on The Washington Post, the Supreme Court is said to be gauging the death penalty in cases of a person who is intellectually disabled. A specific case, Moore v. Texas, has a particular inmate challenging the death penalty system named Bobby Moore. He, who is guilty of killing a man in an armed robbery in 1980, is challenging exactly how they choose who is eligible for the death penalty based on intellectual disability. This case has taken many turns since 1980, enough turns to make it to a Supreme Court topic of interest.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas has had a unique history with regards to the number of constitutions the state has governed under. The sixth and final constitution was framed by the Constitutional Convention of 1875. In 1876, it was adopted and remains the backbone for governing Texas today. Starting with Texas’ independence from Mexico in 1836 and leading up to the Constitution of 1876, Texas went through a range of political beliefs.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kristin Paull Professor Jennifer Ritchey Texas Government 2306 September 7, 2015 The Texas Constitution The state of Texas has gone through many constitutional revisions since the first was introduced. It differs in many ways from the federal constitution and has some provisions that are unique to it. The current constitution is continually growing and being revised as times change, to become more modern for our industrialized state.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does it make sense for people to follow laws that were established more than a hundred years ago? The Texas Constitution of 1876, which is currently in use (Maxwell et al. 60), states in Article 4, section 23 that “the comptroller of public accounts, commissioner of the General Land Office, attorney general, and any statutory state officer who is elected statewide to reside at the state capital during their terms of office” (). In 2015 there was an amendment up for voting, Senate Joint Resolution 52 or proposition 3 by Senator Donna Campbell, which would repeal the fact that statewide elected officers have to live in the state capital (). The proposition was passed on November 3, 2015, with 66 percent of the votes for it.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arizona, which ruled that the inculpatory and exculpatory evidence brought against a defendant at trial is only admissible if the defendant has been informed of his right against self-incrimination as well as his right to consult with an attorney. This Supreme Court decision was brought about by the conviction of Ernesto Miranda, who provided a confession to police without being informed of his right to counsel and his right to remain silent. The Arizona State Supreme Court upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that because he had not been informed of his rights, his rights had not been properly upheld. The key to this decision is the distinction between an informed waiving of those rights, and an uninformed waiving of those rights. If a person is convicted based on self-incrimination, the prosecution must be able to prove that they were explicitly aware of and subsequently waived their rights.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States has given us a set of rules and rights that protect and serve the people of its country. The citizens of the United States are born with rights that some of us may or may not know, but the government and police are sworn to protect these rights with the upmost respect. The 1966 Miranda v. Arizona court case was one, if not, the most influential verdicts in this country. Our Fifth Amendment, which protects citizens from self-incrimination in the courts, supports the Miranda decision. In this paper, I will explain what the Miranda Warnings are and how they work.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays