The question, questions the idea of safety by using a piece of history that hits many lives in a negative way. It brings to the table, a situation where both freedom and safety were absent. A known fact being that slaves had no freedom but desired to be free. An unrecognized fact that comes to question is were the slaves safe in return for no freedom? An answer to that based on the evidence presented in many historical readings and such is no. Slaves in general were treated very poorly. Reasons being they were forced to labor under an iron foot of their owners. There was unethical as well as unmoral treatments towards slaves, whether it was 1820 in America or it was the 302 BC in the Roman Empire. No matter the location or time period, a worldwide common knowledge was the poor treatment towards slaves. Their freedom being stripped away did not promise safety in
The question, questions the idea of safety by using a piece of history that hits many lives in a negative way. It brings to the table, a situation where both freedom and safety were absent. A known fact being that slaves had no freedom but desired to be free. An unrecognized fact that comes to question is were the slaves safe in return for no freedom? An answer to that based on the evidence presented in many historical readings and such is no. Slaves in general were treated very poorly. Reasons being they were forced to labor under an iron foot of their owners. There was unethical as well as unmoral treatments towards slaves, whether it was 1820 in America or it was the 302 BC in the Roman Empire. No matter the location or time period, a worldwide common knowledge was the poor treatment towards slaves. Their freedom being stripped away did not promise safety in