Sacks Science Vs Religion Summary

Improved Essays
In Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks’ video “Science versus Religion,” Rabbi Sacks talks to three different atheist scientists who are working on the frontline of scientific breakthrough. He talks to them to see if science and religion can agree on certain topics or if they will forever be in conflict. (add more) Neuroscientist, Baroness Susan Greenfield was the first person Rabbi Sacks conversed with. She is a professor at Oxford, currently researching the human conscience and (attempting) to understand how the human conciseness is generated from brain cells. This is a major unanswered question in the field of neuroscience. Scientists, however, are unable to explain the phenomenon of human conciseness because they do not know what they are looking for and are therefore incapable of determining how the human conscience is generated. Religion, on the other …show more content…
They discussed the importance of asking questions and challenging everything. A quote at the heart of science is, “take no ones word for it” is also an important part of Judaism, unlike many other religions. Judaism teaches its children to ask questions and challenge conventional assumptions. It does not want people to have blind or unquestioning faith. Even God wants people to challenge him and ask questions. The difference between science and religion on the (agreed) topic of (asking) questions and challenging everything is the evidence used to answer those questions. Science responds to a question with evidence that has been scientifically proven as actual fact. Religion, and more specifically, the religions of the Bible, also responds to question with evidence but consider the Bible to be a historical text that represents actual events. These events may not have happened as fact but (something) happened and the stories are based on the lesson of what actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People tend to lean to one side or the other. In the field where spirituality and science does not coexist, Jahren creates a way to study and respect both for the greater good of all people. Jahren realizes she is a part of something much bigger. She uses that knowledge to drive her studies and prepare a way for future generations of scientists and even just people who enjoy the aspects nature. Jahren writes about her humbling, bold…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay One Throughout the course of human history science and its’ discoveries have been constantly changing and advancing, you could even say it has been evolving. From the Ancient Greeks to modern day science and the understanding of nature it provides has grown as views have changed over time. One of the most significant changes is how scientific views changed between 1600 and 1871. Scientific views changed between 1600 and 1871 as they started to become less influenced by religion, scientists having different views and methods, and the impact of exploration on science.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By Palmer asking this question, it shows Ellie that science and faith cannot work alone. To elaborate, without faith, new discoveries and scientific theories…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning scientific theories supported christians and their beliefs. Science was in parallel with God being the creator of the world and his everlasting effect in how it rotates today. This allowed there to be an alliance with science, nonetheless, when the new Darwin theory came out everything changed. Unlike Newton theory, Darwin believed that there was a naturalist creation. This theory conflicts in several ways that christians have known to grow up with.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern day, science seems to (or sometimes attempts to) trump the Christian Bible in every way for some. It’s as if modern science can’t see similarities or agreements between the two, so one must choose one or the other. In John H. Walton’s “Human Origins and The Bible,” he explains that the Bible does not contain any kind of “scientific revelation” and whatever science is within the Bible would have been general knowledge for everyone. But in our present day of the 21st century, many feel that science and the Bible must work together somehow, but with all of the answers science is providing, it feels like an attack on our beliefs.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Entwistle book there were many times to where I would stop and ask “Could a person change their view on religion and science. For instance, is it possible for a person to become a true believer in science and then through Christ could they become a person who is a Theologize?”. As well as, with allies and enemies, at this point in time in the world, as the perspectives are changes and as a society we are more open on how people think and act. In the world now is religion and science allies? I know that we can’t be enemies because as our society is forever changing we are more acceptable to other views; we are more aware that there is something bigger than us.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While these scientists remain stuck with only the thoughts of just dealing with science and not allowing any further hurdles, including religion these scientists can commit crazy feats by just doing their job and that allows us to grow but still has limitations. Some limitations of science are beyond the edges and other things that just feel like they cannot be described by numbers and scientific theory. Goodall refers to some of these things while she is exploring the forests of Gombe. Looking at the world from the lenses of science can allow people to start to understand the world around us from a cold and calculated view. The scientific view of the world allows people to understand more phenomenon, for example we can now understand…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people still struggle with trying to fit scientific discoveries of even theories with their religious beliefs. When scientists try to reason out the creation of the world and arrive at theories like the Big Bang Theory that clash with biblical stories, like the story of Genesis in this case, some people assume that Christianity and science can't possibly align. Science is not the only thing Christianity is separated from; there is a similar situation with…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ruse say science is defined by a collection of laws. The major laws are explanation, prediction, testability, confirmation, and falsifiability. These laws help us disseminate between science and non-science. Religion does not follow the natural laws of science, since religious beliefs violate the “law” with the notion of miracles. Miracles are believed to be true events that happened, with no explanation for the phenomenon.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bruce does make a point to say that, while people see religion and science as conflicting opposites, religion is challenged less by specific science than by the underlying logic of sciences, as the logic causes people to look for answers and “undermines the notion of a fixed and unchanging…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, now we have historians of science who not only agree with this notion but also reject the idea that religion and science are not compatible. They have gone ahead to write volumes refuting “the conflict thesis”: the idea that religion and science are essentially in conflict (Seiler). For example, Stark; one of the most contemporary advocates for the new view, published his book For the Glory of God dedicating a chapter to the notion that the philosophical groundwork on which modern science developed was laid, by…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Christianity does embraces scientific reasoning because we live in a world that science has helped to improve humankind, life style, however, when science takes the place of God’s authority in the earth, man will only be subjective to his thoughts and not God the creator of all creations. Consequently, science is completely different from Christianity. Christians center their attention on values, morals, faith, and truth. They believe in the principle of the Bible, and that the Bible reveals the mind of God to those who have accepted him as their Savior. In addition, Christianity embraces the Bible as being the infallible word of God, and without it acceptance, man will be lost in their sins.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War between Science and Religion “Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus of Thor – but they have few followers now.” Sir Arthur C. Clarke In the beginning there was nothing: just darkness. Then out of nothing appeared everything.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and religion are two words that are assumed to oppose each other due to the factual, logical basis of science and the faith in the unknown presented in religion. Yet these two disciplines share many commonalities and interactions that lead to the development of a field of study. Alfred White Northhead, a Protestant theologian, exceptionally expressed that God and nature work as one, indicating any change in the science nature, should lead to an alteration with how society comprehends God. (Olsen, 2) Throughout this paper it will be clear that science and religion are a field due to the commonalities the disciplines share, the overlap of knowledge seen in both topics and importantly the dispersion of the work among academics.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays