Generally individuals have family members who wants to support them in seeking substance abuse recovery. An unfortunate situation can be if the client doesn’t have the support during treatment the process can then become ineffective. Although family members can be a source during intervention they can also possibly be an impediment for the client. In parallel researcher’s acknowledge the importance of family members having a positive outcome on the substance abuse client’s treatment when involvement (e.g., E. E. Epstein & McCrady, 1998; O’Farrell & Fals-Stewart, 2003). Substance abuse clients are either married or singled. A meta-analysis (Powers, Vedel, & Emmelkamp, 2008) have recognized that behavioral couples therapy (BCT) isn’t only for drug abuse client’s cohabitation, but also it can have a positive effect on alcoholism for individual based treatments client’s as well. Rather it’s a female or male client in treat counseling inclines treatment retention, while declining the use of drugs (heroin) use. In addition for the client to cope with reality they’re likely being slowly weaned off any ATOD with either an opioid detoxification, in addition to methadone, or followed up by rehabilitation maintenance. This demonstrates another form of having a reinforcement based treatment (RBT) which is individually based and the (BCT) is grouped based. As they mutually …show more content…
Which can possibly help assisting counselor when descriptive verbal responding or when descriptively documenting written communication in regards to the client. Explains why this training had to be evaluated from a high or low social skill aspect. Basically utilizing training methods from a University level to rate counselors. Enhances the social skills of numerous therapist or counselors. Although, reflective listening (RL), can be viewed as non-directive counseling. Due to a counselor reflecting on their own instincts and recollection when rewording the conversation before repeat it to the client for understanding and confirmation (Gordon, 1970, p. 50). It can also possibly demonstrate as establishing a therapeutic response when reporting or engaging with their client’s. This can be considered a therapeutic working alliance which can be insubstantial (e.g., Glauser & Bozarth, 2001). Which permits the counselor to channel actively when determining the appropriate needs and best fit for the client. During the individual’s interview, assessment, diagnosis, treatment plan, and when deciding to achieve a sustainable goal in the recovery process for a client. By reflecting on what the individual has conveyed to their therapist or counselor. However it can be misinterpreted as a method, while the counselor